Lsrcr Forum

xDeadlyKiller wrote:

Akeel wrote:

Rumblehorn wrote:

I guess so, no? I mean there is a difference between a criminal faction and mafias, I think that govt is well aware of them (one specific mafia that is well equipped of guns and does tons of crimes)

What is the difference of criminal and mafias for you then? Both does the same acts and mafias are known as criminal lol.

Name a mafia that is as known as SWAT or Army. His point is that the SWAT team and army and known worldwide whilst there isn't really any criminal organisation that is. In lsrcr's case, Pragati was created to fit that spot

Yeah, but lets talk about the topic, I still think it's good the way it is now, no criminal faction is needed as long we have a group system.

+1 i think good idea if possible..

xDeadlyKiller wrote:

Akeel wrote:

Rumblehorn wrote:

I guess so, no? I mean there is a difference between a criminal faction and mafias, I think that govt is well aware of them (one specific mafia that is well equipped of guns and does tons of crimes)

What is the difference of criminal and mafias for you then? Both does the same acts and mafias are known as criminal lol.

Name a mafia that is as known as SWAT or Army. His point is that the SWAT team and army and known worldwide whilst there isn't really any criminal organisation that is. In lsrcr's case, Pragati was created to fit that spot

Thats it

Not particularly a criminal faction.
I'd suggest some groups to tie up and the base will be more bigger and there will be more fun too. This may affect criminal activity.

Ducati. wrote:

Not particularly a criminal faction.
I'd suggest some groups to tie up and the base will be more bigger and there will be more fun too. This may affect criminal activity.

this^

MichL1337 wrote:

Ducati. wrote:

Not particularly a criminal faction.
I'd suggest some groups to tie up and the base will be more bigger and there will be more fun too. This may affect criminal activity.

this^

Diplomatic. wrote:

Edit: I mean, we gather all groups' stuff in a basic one and make it a faction and leaders become testers or each leader hires one tester

yeah, indeed. that is what i actually said when i edited the topic after few minutes from suggesting it

Ducati. wrote:

Not particularly a criminal faction.
I'd suggest some groups to tie up and the base will be more bigger and there will be more fun too. This may affect criminal activity.

As Ducati said if seniors allow us to tie up 2 or 3 groups it will of more fun and better interest.
But for criminal frction -1, as diplo said it will help to get more players in sikn. Well it wont be possible besause factions are hader tonbe a part of.

-1 cop hunting needs to be discouraged completely. Cop hunting is half the reason we have these stupid crutch users in the first place. LSRCR being a CnR server should try to be more CnR than this TDM bullshit.

PG being a hitman based mafiaish RP faction which would already count as a criminal faction. Just not in the ways of cop hunting. (Just being a hitman is considered illegal so in terms of RP you already are a criminal.)

It's literally a good suggestion. Cops have their own faction for their weapons, vehicles etc. . . Why not criminals too? It'd make the game more active. Players would like to have their own faction too. They'd take their weapons and vehicles to cop hunt as cops do to criminals. I think, criminals would like it.

//EDIT: They have Army and S.W.A.T with them. Army have some vehicles who criminals doesn't have such as a Hydra or Hunter.

+1

Instead of official factions we should work on the group system. If we were to add a criminal faction it would completely make most official groups useless. This idea has been on the senior table for months and this was the crucial argument why we simply cannot add it. If we were to add turfs (viewtopic.php?f=620&t=100499) to promote competitive gameplay between official groups we could arrange sections for most active groups just below army/swat/pagati making them semi-official for extended period of time.