Talis wrote:After reading Fantastic's post, I have to agree that Luxury houses are better off being non-rentable.If we disable access to all the benefits for the original owner, would that help?
Robin wrote:If it means only the tenant is able to use the benefits, then I'd say it would be a much better choice.Talis wrote:After reading Fantastic's post, I have to agree that Luxury houses are better off being non-rentable.If we disable access to all the benefits for the original owner, would that help?
Rally3 wrote:Keeping houses in general in mind (including the future rented ones) - what is the purpose of owning a house? Currently, it’s as follows (in my eyes):I do agree we should perhaps find some ways to make houses more worth it.
Advantages of owning/renting a house:
> A fixed spawn that you choose
> An interior/location to chill/rp in.
Disadvantages:
> Can get a fixed spawn by some skins/classes, or by being a group member for “free”
> Spawns above provide access to vehicles (and sometimes drugs/weapons/items too) without the player spending a dime
> You are more likely to chill and have fun in your groups base than in your own house since more people can be involved (although maybe in your house you can have more control of who is there)
> You’re limited to one undonated house, whereas you can be in as many groups as you’re accepted in
Simply in my eyes there’s a clear conclusion: houses were a big aspect when groups weren’t what they are right now, so you have to think of ways to make owning a house worth it. If you make houses worth it, you’re inherently giving a purpose to renting a house for those that can’t afford the benefits of having a house for themselves.
I’ll expand more a bit on #discussion since here it will be glanced over or just not replied at with effort, but that’s my “summarized” opinion above. Make owning (and therefore renting) a house worth it.