Lsrcr Forum

hop4syrialose

killdahobo99 wrote:

Reda wrote:

You've heard it all over the news, Syria used gas against their own people thats disgusting!
Now the world especially USA is making a plan to put down their president Assad, but with that they can only use their
army and rockets but also Syria can attack those countries too who attacks Syria.. Guys what do you think about this?

is it confirmed that Syria is the one using chemical weapons on its people? I'm reading everywhere that the US is supplying the rebels and is actually the one to use these weapons.

Either way, this whole thing is another taliban situation that Russia/US had with I think it was Afghanistan....The CIA created the Taliban and in the same way they are feeding the rebels in Syria. Politicians with personal agendas are killing thousands of people.

are you literally stupid? how can you deny it? there are 500 proofs that chemical weapons has been used in syria and if you haven't read any article about it don't post bs

[Lsrcr]CresP wrote:

USA have to attack Syria... Because this country has a lot of oil resources. According to the Oil and Gas Journal, Syria had 2,500,000,000 barrels (400,000,000 m3) of petroleum reserves as of 1 January 2010.

another imbecile...USA has picked over 50 targets which contains military bases airports and weapons arsenals and did not target any single oil or gas or any bullshit you bring up here constantly

JohnCarer wrote:

Funny how no other country interferes in any other country relations than USA. Has to be in everything and has to conquer everything.
And it's also funny how you easily believe the news... I've seen so much American bullshit few months ago when I followed Yahoo.com news.

funny how only USA cares about the syrian citizens that get fired with chemical weapons each day and wishes to warn their leader in order to stop him from going on the same dangerous road if you don't believe the news please turn off your internet and i believe it will help you much

All ate the lie? Basically USA isn't going to fight Syria, it's just a shot to make them stop using chemicals against citizen,
anyway, do you know that USA is the main head of Arabic revolutions?

killdahobo99 wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tJSn3udW-M&lc=qIDg8ASOkLQj7ZVgqEhp3ieCzkWvSBLD5jKn81ejV2M

Here one of those anonymous videos on the issue

Date added: 2012, lol.

David Ickes facebook^

Hiccup wrote:

All ate the lie? Basically USA isn't going to fight Syria, it's just a shot to make them stop using chemicals against citizen,
anyway, do you know that USA is the main head of Arabic revolutions?

nope, you can keep dreaming USA controls the world as hobo our main paranoid but your people wanted the chaos and to drop the government and you made it, now enjoy the situation...plus USA delivers like 7 billions each year to egypt which means they have no interests to do it

dizzy50 wrote:

killdahobo99 wrote:

Reda wrote:

You've heard it all over the news, Syria used gas against their own people thats disgusting!
Now the world especially USA is making a plan to put down their president Assad, but with that they can only use their
army and rockets but also Syria can attack those countries too who attacks Syria.. Guys what do you think about this?

is it confirmed that Syria is the one using chemical weapons on its people? I'm reading everywhere that the US is supplying the rebels and is actually the one to use these weapons.

Either way, this whole thing is another taliban situation that Russia/US had with I think it was Afghanistan....The CIA created the Taliban and in the same way they are feeding the rebels in Syria. Politicians with personal agendas are killing thousands of people.

are you literally stupid? how can you deny it? there are 500 proofs that chemical weapons has been used in syria and if you haven't read any article about it don't post bs

Wow? is it that time of the month again ? Why'd you just randomly snap like a little bitch without even reading what I had actually wrote? You have no idea what your saying but criticize what I write? Grow the fuck up. As far as I have read, no one could 100 percent confirm who used chemical weapons (In terms of if it was the rebels/Assads regime). For the United States to justify moving in, they need to prove to lawmakers that Assad is using chemical weapons. That is all I said and it flew right over your head.

dizzy50 wrote:

[Lsrcr]CresP wrote:

USA have to attack Syria... Because this country has a lot of oil resources. According to the Oil and Gas Journal, Syria had 2,500,000,000 barrels (400,000,000 m3) of petroleum reserves as of 1 January 2010.

another imbecile...USA has picked over 50 targets which contains military bases airports and weapons arsenals and did not target any single oil or gas or any bullshit you bring up here constantly

Another idiotic post made by the one and only Dizzy.