Re: Seasparrow rule
Posted: September 26, 2014, 8:44 am
+1
GrumpyCat wrote:+1
Page 2 of 4
Re: Seasparrow rule
Posted: October 14, 2014, 10:56 am
Re: Seasparrow rule
Posted: October 14, 2014, 2:13 pm
Faraon78910 wrote:ShaYaN wrote:I agree with this suggestion. +1
Re: Seasparrow rule
Posted: October 15, 2014, 4:38 pm
I agree, I'm supporting this sugguestion.
+1
+1
Re: Seasparrow rule
Posted: October 15, 2014, 4:52 pm
I dont think you can actually hit the person on the bike.
The M4 on the heli is automatically aiming at the vehicle, and a bike can only be destroyed with an explosion.
Correct me if im wrong tho.
The M4 on the heli is automatically aiming at the vehicle, and a bike can only be destroyed with an explosion.
Correct me if im wrong tho.
Re: Seasparrow rule
Posted: October 15, 2014, 5:37 pm
Game_Over wrote:I dont think you can actually hit the person on the bike.well, as you say it. You might be correct. We should test it :3
The M4 on the heli is automatically aiming at the vehicle, and a bike can only be destroyed with an explosion.
Correct me if im wrong tho.
Re: Seasparrow rule
Posted: October 15, 2014, 6:19 pm
[Lsrcr]PiPo wrote:Believe it or not, bikes have the same amount of HP like cars (1000). So if you damage it enough it SHOULD disappear in theory, you have to test it though - not sure if the M4 affects the HP but if fall damage does then M4 should too!Game_Over wrote:I dont think you can actually hit the person on the bike.well, as you say it. You might be correct. We should test it :3
The M4 on the heli is automatically aiming at the vehicle, and a bike can only be destroyed with an explosion.
Correct me if im wrong tho.
Re: Seasparrow rule
Posted: October 16, 2014, 7:42 am
Oh,Seriously ?
Why did you just suggest it for bikes ? *_*
If they allow us to use it on suspects who are using a BMX then why not on Red ones driving a car - nrg- etc...?
And also, Seasparrow is just useless atm. Same rule as hunter ? Then we would prefer hunter for using. It has a better speed - better handling - And a minifuckinggun
Why did you just suggest it for bikes ? *_*
If they allow us to use it on suspects who are using a BMX then why not on Red ones driving a car - nrg- etc...?
And also, Seasparrow is just useless atm. Same rule as hunter ? Then we would prefer hunter for using. It has a better speed - better handling - And a minifuckinggun
Re: Seasparrow rule
Posted: October 16, 2014, 12:55 pm
HunTeR1 wrote:Oh,Seriously ?because we can pop tires and blew up nrg and car, bike not
Why did you just suggest it for bikes ? *_*
If they allow us to use it on suspects who are using a BMX then why not on Red ones driving a car - nrg- etc...
And also, Seasparrow is just useless atm. Same rule as hunter ? Then we would prefer hunter for using. It has a better speed - better handling - And a minifuckinggun
fgts on bike taking drugs and jumping walls its hard to folow them with car or bike and kill them
Re: Seasparrow rule
Posted: October 17, 2014, 4:56 pm
Faraon78910 wrote:Think twice about what I wrote. I said, when we can use it on suspects on BMX then why not bike for example ? It makes sense that way, Otherwise the way it is now is fine lol...HunTeR1 wrote:Oh,Seriously ?because we can pop tires and blew up nrg and car, bike not
Why did you just suggest it for bikes ? *_*
If they allow us to use it on suspects who are using a BMX then why not on Red ones driving a car - nrg- etc...
And also, Seasparrow is just useless atm. Same rule as hunter ? Then we would prefer hunter for using. It has a better speed - better handling - And a minifuckinggun
fgts on bike taking drugs and jumping walls its hard to folow them with car or bike and kill them