Moiz Nouman wrote:Aahh, now I get you, so basically first you fail to respond on inactivity check = warning and Second time = kick.Yeah unless they notify us about their inactivity.
+1
Moiz Nouman wrote:Aahh, now I get you, so basically first you fail to respond on inactivity check = warning and Second time = kick.
+1
122policeofficer wrote:I am reading all this comments,and I don't understand......we wanna to have some good Army officers but accepting them and after some time kicking don't sounds so good....I'm happy to see someone clearly shares my point of view
Why you people have so much hate or what ever is ? There is some people who lost interest to play and get back after few months and play constantly again,I don't see reasons to kick someone for that....I mean why we need to be so politicans and act like that...If someone become Army officer it should stay forever no matter is he active or not...I don't see the point...Is unactive player brake some rules f he not play,is he insulting someone....IDK but for me that's not good idea....Look fir example that Army have like 15 officers and 14 of them are inactive for some time,so they got be kicked and Army dissapear just like that....That's something what I want to say.....I think we should make our team biggest not force players to leave or kiciking them except they rule braking......If someone is army officer and don't want to be anymore he can leave team when he want but after that I will give players like that just one more chance to be in our team again not more....Not like this one mounth army second swat third army....
Don't someone understand me in wrong way......I want to say answering to inacivity check is not so bad and not so hard,also we have in-activity topic where we can report us if wanna be inactive.....that's all fine,but kicking someone because he is not active and you knowing what that player need to do to become that what is,I think that can bring some player lost for interest to ever again apply for our team!
Reagrds
Moiz Nouman wrote:Aahh, now I get you, so basically first you fail to respond on inactivity check = warning and Second time = kick.
+1
JohnCarer wrote:Than explain this to me,122policeofficer wrote:I am reading all this comments,and I don't understand......we wanna to have some good Army officers but accepting them and after some time kicking don't sounds so good....I'm happy to see someone clearly shares my point of view
Why you people have so much hate or what ever is ? There is some people who lost interest to play and get back after few months and play constantly again,I don't see reasons to kick someone for that....I mean why we need to be so politicans and act like that...If someone become Army officer it should stay forever no matter is he active or not...I don't see the point...Is unactive player brake some rules f he not play,is he insulting someone....IDK but for me that's not good idea....Look fir example that Army have like 15 officers and 14 of them are inactive for some time,so they got be kicked and Army dissapear just like that....That's something what I want to say.....I think we should make our team biggest not force players to leave or kiciking them except they rule braking......If someone is army officer and don't want to be anymore he can leave team when he want but after that I will give players like that just one more chance to be in our team again not more....Not like this one mounth army second swat third army....
Don't someone understand me in wrong way......I want to say answering to inacivity check is not so bad and not so hard,also we have in-activity topic where we can report us if wanna be inactive.....that's all fine,but kicking someone because he is not active and you knowing what that player need to do to become that what is,I think that can bring some player lost for interest to ever again apply for our team!
Reagrds