Lsrcr Forum

I will agree with some.of your points.
But I'm sure Admins have enough proofs with them..

[Lsrcr]Jobin wrote:

I will agree with some.of your points.
But I'm sure Admins have enough proofs with them..

That's what I'm asking that they can't even provide to me, so that I can defend myself. But instead, Kissane gave me the clue.

Hunter just give him a chance and try out that big hulk skin.

see you mate

Autodesk wrote:

Every tagged member should be respectful, not just for the staffs or friends but for the newbies as well. I know some tag members that aren't so respectful for the newbies or some players. Seriously? Why does they had the tag? I am not inserting this topic because I got denied for 3 times getting the tag, I don't care, I can still respect, or help other players including newbies without the tag. But its kinda shameful that a tag player not respecting most of the players.

Tagged members should be respectful towards other players.
A player plays a game.
Someone who is banned permanently is no longer a player because he has not access to the game.
Thus the rest is self-explainatory.

Mason wrote:

Autodesk wrote:

Every tagged member should be respectful, not just for the staffs or friends but for the newbies as well. I know some tag members that aren't so respectful for the newbies or some players. Seriously? Why does they had the tag? I am not inserting this topic because I got denied for 3 times getting the tag, I don't care, I can still respect, or help other players including newbies without the tag. But its kinda shameful that a tag player not respecting most of the players.

Tagged members should be respectful towards other players.
A player plays a game.
Someone who is banned permanently is no longer a player because he has not access to the game.
Thus the rest is self-explainatory.

You're not nice towards me, and towards others as well.

Autodesk wrote:

Mason wrote:

Autodesk wrote:

Every tagged member should be respectful, not just for the staffs or friends but for the newbies as well. I know some tag members that aren't so respectful for the newbies or some players. Seriously? Why does they had the tag? I am not inserting this topic because I got denied for 3 times getting the tag, I don't care, I can still respect, or help other players including newbies without the tag. But its kinda shameful that a tag player not respecting most of the players.

Tagged members should be respectful towards other players.
A player plays a game.
Someone who is banned permanently is no longer a player because he has not access to the game.
Thus the rest is self-explainatory.

You're not nice towards me, and towards others as well.

In all seriousness, I have nothing against you nor anyone else. Well, against some people, like ISIS 'n shit.
You get the idea, I think you were unfair, and that you lowered the quality of the game by /q abusing so damn much.
Of course, if you, hypothetically speaking, were banned by a mistake, or something like that. Then I hope nothing else
than that you get unbanned ASAP. But Hunter, tbh, after all the shit I've caused him
(god knows how many hours of alca I've forced upon him and his teamboys apex and apaoepeoaepopeoeea), has been a pretty fair admin to me. so ya

Mason wrote:

Autodesk wrote:

You're not nice towards me, and towards others as well.

In all seriousness, I have nothing against you nor anyone else. Well, against some people, like ISIS 'n shit.
You get the idea, I think you were unfair, and that you lowered the quality of the game by /q abusing so damn much.
Of course, if you, hypothetically speaking, were banned by a mistake, or something like that. Then I hope nothing else
than that you get unbanned ASAP. But Hunter, tbh, after all the shit I've caused him
(god knows how many hours of alca I've forced upon him and his teamboys apex and apaoepeoaepopeoeea), has been a pretty fair admin to me. so ya

Not much really far of abusing such /cuffs.

Autodesk wrote:

Mason wrote:

Autodesk wrote:

You're not nice towards me, and towards others as well.

In all seriousness, I have nothing against you nor anyone else. Well, against some people, like ISIS 'n shit.
You get the idea, I think you were unfair, and that you lowered the quality of the game by /q abusing so damn much.
Of course, if you, hypothetically speaking, were banned by a mistake, or something like that. Then I hope nothing else
than that you get unbanned ASAP. But Hunter, tbh, after all the shit I've caused him
(god knows how many hours of alca I've forced upon him and his teamboys apex and apaoepeoaepopeoeea), has been a pretty fair admin to me. so ya

Not much really far of abusing such /cuffs.

I think Energ intended cops to cuff people when he wrote LS-RCR.
I can not come to any other conclusion than that. Several developers have taken
strict measures against /q abusing though. But it is not possible to prevent it fully as
the server does not have a human understanding of it's surroundings.

Mason wrote:

I think Energ intended cops to cuff people when he wrote LS-RCR.
I can not come to any other conclusion than that. Several developers have taken
strict measures against /q abusing though. But it is not possible to prevent it fully as
the server does not have a human understanding of it's surroundings.

/q Abuse is not punishable at the moment, and it is implemented as well, same as /cuff Abuse is not punishable at the moment so all you can do is /cry instead of hating others.