
Moderators: Suggestions helpers, Developers
iFanta wrote:Robin wrote:-1, it's a valid /rp reason.this plus i love doing it on those who keep escaping from me and refusing to freeze n disarm and they take that star from lsa :tearofjoy:
GalaxyGeri wrote:As long as /rp is legit then any officer can do it.
-1
SWAT wrote:You got Red flag from me.Guys, have you actually read all of Car's posts in this thread? Don't you get it? When a player fails to rob/rape/dkidnap, he gets auto-/rped by the server. Then a LEO comes, cuffs him, and /rp-s him FOR THE SAME REASON. That way the guy will get orange and be sent to jail. Isn't that /rp abusing?
-1
GalaxyGeri wrote:As long as /rp is legit then any officer can do it.I already stated why what you claim to be legit makes no sense whatsoever, Jaker nicely quoted your and some of others quotes who thought the same way and with bolded, huge, underlined, capital letters, I hope you'll see what's going on when you decide to read it and you'll hopefully spot the issue.
-1
122policeofficer wrote:NeutralYes but I don't like it when it's abused, in the way I explain people technically abuse it and my solution is just an anti-abuse system.
It's not so bad idea,but however I still belive police officers have to use their /rp command because it's part of their duty,no matter of what server automatically do.
Razer531 wrote:Server is good already, we don't need this one. All we need is re-add anti dm and update a new anti cheat for hackers. Thats the most important, am I clear now? -Ended-P.A wrote:Still noWhy or else don't post.
You see, I have nothing against you, but what's the point of you writing anything here when you don't even want to disscuss about the suggestion and say WHY it's a bad suggestion.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest