Lsrcr Forum

-1 sorry.

Immortall2 wrote:

Sorry but, this is one of the worst suggestions I've ever seen in a while by now. The suggestion itself doesn't have a sense. -1

EDIT: And actually newcomers will break this rule because they're always doing that. That's why I've said that above...

If someone suggested a rule that would forbbid DM-ing you'd still say people would just break it over and over?

/rules

EDIT: So the immortal's logic is that the server shouldn't contain rules because people would break them. It's also pretty hard to script the newcome rule in the /rules command.
Nice logic indeed.

Skillzz wrote:

-1 sorry.

nc expl

Skillzz wrote:

-1 sorry.

Gorm wrote:

Hello guys,

I've been reading through several suggestion topics recently, and I've seen a lot of replies saying either "Positive", "Negative" or "Neutral", just like in SWAT/ARMY applications. While it's appreciated that you guys take part in these discussions, I would like to kindly ask you to avoid making such short posts, because they don't tell us anything. We want to know what you think, what your opinion on the matter is. When replying to a suggestion topic, please raid your mind and try to express the positives and negatives about that suggestion, and what led to your final decision.

Thanks!

I'm going with -1 honestly. Chases get interrupted in real life a good majority of the time, if someone wants to intervene then ether put a wanted level on them and /ar them (if your in cop skin) or shoot them (if you're a criminal) cops arrest people in RL for interrupting police business and criminals usually kill them so it'd be roleplayish and as far as I know wouldn't be breaking any rules.

Indognito wrote:

I'm going with -1 honestly. Chases get interrupted in real life a good majority of the time, if someone wants to intervene then ether put a wanted level on them and /ar them (if your in cop skin) or shoot them (if you're a criminal) cops arrest people in RL for interrupting police business and criminals usually kill them so it'd be roleplayish and as far as I know wouldn't be breaking any rules.

Lsrcr is FAR from real life and should not be treated that way

Mastro wrote:

You are literally limiting our freedom to zero (like seriously, we can't carjack someone etc just because he's getting chased/chasing someone?)

So if I suggested a rule that would state: "DM isn't allowed", you'd say:"(like seriously, we can't dm someone for fun etc just because he's getting chased/chasing someone?)

Mastro wrote:

and new players will break this rule again and again. You can't have 'fair fights' in a CnR server, get that. You will get rammed, carjacked, arrested, robbed, raped during a fight/chase from random players.

So if I suggested a rule that would state: "DM isn't allowed", you'd say:"and new players will break this rule again and again. You can't have 'fair fights' in a CnR server, get that. You will get DM-ed, carparked during a fight/chase.
And also Mastro, you aren't thinking AT ALL when making the list:rammed, carjacked, arrested, robbed, raped.
Ramming, carjacking by INNOCENTS during the fight shouldn't be allowed, but arrests, robbs, rapes, kidnaps are COMPLETELY DIFFERENT. Ramming by innocents shouldn't be allowed because they're IRRELEVANT, while arrests can be done because you're simply wanted, so that may be done, and robberies and rapes are something that is REGULARLY ALLOWED.
Ramming and carjacking by innocents should NOT be REGULARLY ALLOWED when you're performing some LSRCR NATURE fights: hitted/hitman, crim/LEO etc. You're COMPLETELY misunderstanding EVERYTHING, Mastro.

Mastro wrote:

I feel that you got mad because of what happened (got carjacked while trying to escape from a SWAT member), so you decided to go on the forums and make a suggestion you didn't really think about.

Couldn't be more irrelevant.

Mastro wrote:

And no, if an innocent carjacks you, and then you get arrested, it doesn't necessarily mean he tried to help that cop.

What the fuck ?
Innocent carjacks you and because of an irrelevant innocent you get arrested.
"it doesn't necessarily mean he tried to help that cop." - Mastro 2016
Meant he to help that cop or not, he is ruining the gameplay, because again, for the 1000000th time, AN IRRELEVANT INNOCENT IS GIVING AN ADVANTAGE TO A RELEVANT SIDE OF A FIGHT OF THE LSRCR NATURE.
COMPLETELY LOGICALLY unfair.

Razer531 wrote:

Indognito wrote:

I'm going with -1 honestly. Chases get interrupted in real life a good majority of the time, if someone wants to intervene then ether put a wanted level on them and /ar them (if your in cop skin) or shoot them (if you're a criminal) cops arrest people in RL for interrupting police business and criminals usually kill them so it'd be roleplayish and as far as I know wouldn't be breaking any rules.

Lsrcr is FAR from real life and should not be treated that way

Not really. Cali is getting shot up and robbed almost all the time and it happens more often in the cities gangs declare war over drug spots and cartels are usually doing there best to sell there product. Same stuff you see in Lsrcr so it's more realistic then you would think.

Why do you argue? The rule itself is pointless and the suggestion sub-forum is full with useless suggestions made by you. Like seriously?

EDIT: You should actually respect the votes, not argue on every single vote.

Immortall2 wrote:

Why do you argue? The rule itself is pointless and the suggestion sub-forum is full with useless suggestions made by you. Like seriously?

EDIT: You should actually respect the votes, not argue on every single vote.

i'm not arguing. im discussing about arguments given by both sides.

EDIT:

Immortall2 wrote:

You should actually respect the votes, not argue on every single vote.

*scrolls up a little bit*

Immortall2 wrote:

suggestion sub-forum is full with useless suggestions made by you.

wow