Lsrcr Forum

Ty$on wrote:

We can't handle Mods/Admins job, they are useless then.
It would be like: Friends will joke with each other by reporting one three times.

did u read the Why should it be accepted??

Only supporters who can do it and supporters are not retards and they are helpers of the admins like administrators right hand,Supporters are more active so they can help,Also admins got real life problems,job,work etc..... so some times there isnt admins in-game and hackers come and we cant play fairly and have fun,And about absuing this like a joke it cant be abused cause supporters are tagged members and admins give tag to experienced and who they trust that he deserve the tag and even if 3supporters abuse it they ll get ban+tag removal and i am sure no supporter will abuse this cause who is accepting/denying supporters application knows evry one b4 they accept him.

I'm guessing that some of you clearly do not see the whole picture here so let me explain.

Supporters as said before, are people who had gained some trust from the staff, and are given the position, because staff trusts them to do their jobs fairly, therefore it is out of the question that this is something which will be abused, it is not something to be played with. (in case this is implemented in the game)

Also as I said, staff is not always present in the game, and I will not go into that, we all have our lives to take care of, so it is only reasonable for them not to be in game 24/00, but when it comes to supporters, who are always expanding in numbers, there is always at least one in the server, so this would be a very efficient way to deal with hackers if the staff isn't present.

If the staff is present in the server, then there is absolutely no need for supporters to perform this and the job stays only for the staff.

To sum up, this would be very useful for the server, since as you all know hackers tend to mess with multiple people, and that really can be frustrating, especially if it lasts for a longer period of time.

Today there has been one guy, the hacker, who is from Serbia, he is present on the server for a week or two, and for good 40 minutes he has been harassing the players, and staff wasn't present. The S.W.A.T. team couldn't operate because this guy was killing us with car flying hacks, and even thought few people, including myself had called for staff, via forum, they couldn't respond immediately, but imagine if something like this could be sorted out in matter of seconds with the help of 3 supporters.

I think that this suggestion is really brilliant, and I'd love to see it implemented.

I fully support this. Because only trusted & experienced players are given the supporter position who, in future are the moderators. +1

This is going to get denied because supporters aren't supposed to have any power over your average player.

There was already a vote kick suggestion and it got denied.


It was supposed to be where 3 votes to kick = kick and you had to have proofs along with a report. Still denied.

So this must likely isn't getting accepted.

I understand, however there should be a solution for this, I call for staff to have a discussion and come up with a better idea on how to control the hackers when they are not present in the server.

Nikola_123 wrote:

I understand, however there should be a solution for this, I call for staff to have a discussion and come up with a better idea on how to control the hackers when they are not present in the server.

The only solution is to improve Autoban system.

Supporter has one job. Its job is to help the newbies by answering questions. There are countless ways of abusing this for example:
3 reporters report an innocent for hacks.
Why did they do it?
All the reporters accidentally typed the wrong ID.
There are lots of ways, like getting kicked for talking non English in the mainchat and such.

Negative.

This is terrible lol. The supporter system is already flawed even in the answering questions part. It assumes that supporters are always right and have flawless knowledge of the rules and punishments, etc. If I was a newbie and asked how to do something and received a wrong answer, no one can correct them. Translate this to bans and punishments and you'll see why this is even worse.

We each have our own roles to play, let staff do what they have to do and you play as regularly, if you see a hacker /report. If there's no staff online, head over to the forums and report here.

Rally3 wrote:

This is terrible lol. The supporter system is already flawed even in the answering questions part. It assumes that supporters are always right and have flawless knowledge of the rules and punishments, etc. If I was a newbie and asked how to do something and received a wrong answer, no one can correct them. Translate this to bans and punishments and you'll see why this is even worse.

We each have our own roles to play, let staff do what they have to do and you play as regularly, if you see a hacker /report. If there's no staff online, head over to the forums and report here.

Lol didn't u leave?

Community supporters aren't admins so inturn this shouldn't be implemented cause it gives too much power to those who might abuse it.


-1