Lsrcr Forum

Rally3 wrote:

Speaking as probably one of the top 10 donors of the server (might be wrong, but anyone that's donated over $150 can correct me, I know there's a couple of you which is why I said top 10), I don't agree with this.

You can ask for topics to be locked, no need to keep fomenting this attitude of useless privileges that only encourage to "play to be admins".

Rally3 wrote:

Speaking as probably one of the top 10 donors of the server (might be wrong, but anyone that's donated over $150 can correct me, I know there's a couple of you which is why I said top 10), I don't agree with this.

You can ask for topics to be locked, no need to keep fomenting this attitude of useless privileges that only encourage to "play to be admins".

ackman wrote:

Rally3 wrote:

Speaking as probably one of the top 10 donors of the server (might be wrong, but anyone that's donated over $150 can correct me, I know there's a couple of you which is why I said top 10), I don't agree with this.

You can ask for topics to be locked, no need to keep fomenting this attitude of useless privileges that only encourage to "play to be admins".

$150+ yes,

anyway for the suggestion, i'll go with rally's reply.

GalaxyGeri wrote:

Donors aren't trusted people, so they could abuse it. Such as making really offensive topics and locking it, by giving the admins an extra job.

-1

GalaxyGeri wrote:

Donors aren't trusted people, so they could abuse it. Such as making really offensive topics and locking it, by giving the admins an extra job.

-1

GalaxyGeri wrote:

Donors aren't trusted people, so they could abuse it. Such as making really offensive topics and locking it, by giving the admins an extra job.

-1