Voting.

[ackman]

Okay, people you need to chill.

We got rid of template voting because it was too complicated, but I don't know why some people thought that getting rid of templates meant that they should make dumb and inappropriate votes.

There should always be a dose of seriousnes and professionalism to each vote, stating why you are pro or why you are against the applicant. And those arguments should be elaborated in a professional manner, not casualy like you were chatting with someone on the street.

I think votes should stay open and free to be created however the voter wants, as long as they are made to elaborate reasons with a dose of professionalism.

1. Elaborate in short details why you are for/against applicant joining the team by giving him negative/neutral/positive vote.

2. Give specific reasons to your decision.

3. Conclude the vote with an advice for applicant on what he should improve, or anything you feel would help him accomplish better results.

It is really not that hard.

[[Lsrcr]SkBoY]

Okay, people you need to chill.

We got rid of template voting because it was too complicated, but I don't know why some people thought that getting rid of templates meant that they should make dumb and inappropriate votes.

There should always be a dose of seriousnes and professionalism to each vote, stating why you are pro or why you are against the applicant. And those arguments should be elaborated in a professional manner, not casualy like you were chatting with someone on the street.

I think votes should stay open and free to be created however the voter wants, as long as they are made to elaborate reasons with a dose of professionalism.

1. Elaborate in short details why you are for/against applicant joining the team by giving him negative/neutral/positive vote.

2. Give specific reasons to your decision.

3. Conclude the vote with an advice for applicant on what he should improve, or anything you feel would help him accomplish better results.

It is really not that hard.