
Moderators: Suggestions helpers, Developers
Hiresh wrote:WHY DOES THIS WASTE THEIR TIME WHEN ITS THEIR JOBNeelofa wrote:People here crying giving an argument that it dm's them and this is not dm serverYeah, waste admins their time because some group didn’t wanna replace their vortex?
Please stop exaggerating, how many times do you see someone driving a vortex?
Plus i never get dmed by a vortex, WHY? Because i avoid the place where cops and criminal in vortex are clashing, Play smart , dont be stupid and then cry over over being dmed.
Exceptional cases can be reported to admin which can warn the driver.


Ducati. wrote:If we are crying to remove it then you are crying to keep the vortex.THAT IS WHY I GAVE POSITIVE ON VORTEX BEING ALLOWED FOR OTHER GROUPS? Please read the replies.
Simple as that.
And yes you have nothing to defend so you will exaggerate the deathmatch thing.
Answer my 1 question
If vortex restricted for all groups then why "Terrorsits" is an exception to this ?
Spoiler: show


Neelofa wrote:I've nothing against Terrorists, and by wasting their time I mean, this could all been solved if you were no exceptional group. Vortex were removed from all groups (supposing you did read my whole suggestion), why not Terrorists? What's the reason behind that? Yeah, you probably don't know. Anyway "we rarely use our vortex", we never said you were using them 24/7, but you cannot say rarely since it's being used quite often nowadays.Hiresh wrote:WHY DOES THIS WASTE THEIR TIME WHEN ITS THEIR JOBNeelofa wrote:People here crying giving an argument that it dm's them and this is not dm serverYeah, waste admins their time because some group didn’t wanna replace their vortex?
Please stop exaggerating, how many times do you see someone driving a vortex?
Plus i never get dmed by a vortex, WHY? Because i avoid the place where cops and criminal in vortex are clashing, Play smart , dont be stupid and then cry over over being dmed.
Exceptional cases can be reported to admin which can warn the driver.
PLUS
If you want to talk about TERRORIST's vortex only then:
1: Literally by the time you reach rank 4 you are experienced and skilled enought to know how to drive vortex
2: We rarely use our vortex and you cant blame us for dming
3: Never have i ever seen a player reporting/complaining about OUR vortexes when we cophunt on it, because we know how to use it.
Ofcourse, you can stick to your arguement about allowing it for all groups but then again replying with "wasting admins time because a group didnt want to remove its vortex" clearly seems you have a personal agend against the group.

Neelofa wrote:I've no problems if it is allowed for all groups but yeah, gameplay would be ruined. Absynth Crew had 4 vortex and now they've 0 left, I don't find any reason for 'Terrorists' group to be an exception.ackman wrote:Definitely a yes from me, it doesn't make any sense either. It was removed from every group except for the Terrorists (probably because of DollarMan arguments). I feel like it should be allowed for every group or for no group at all.There is no way removing vortex from terrorist going to increase donations because VORTEX IS AVAILABLE ONLY FOR RANK 4 , which is definitely not easy to get and only 3-4 people have that rank, most of them being inactive.
I would also like to say that most of the members in Terrorists group are because of vortex, I believe it will also increase the donation if this gets removed. An example is player Alexxie.
Allow it for all groups? Yeah sure.



Neelofa wrote:I am not asking your views about keeping it or not.Ducati. wrote:If we are crying to remove it then you are crying to keep the vortex.THAT IS WHY I GAVE POSITIVE ON VORTEX BEING ALLOWED FOR OTHER GROUPS? Please read the replies.
Simple as that.
And yes you have nothing to defend so you will exaggerate the deathmatch thing.
Answer my 1 question
If vortex restricted for all groups then why "Terrorsits" is an exception to this ?
Spoiler: show
Forum Rules wrote:2. Avoid using caps lock.
| [center][img]https://i.imgur.com/sQBU8SP.png[/img][/center] | [center][img]http://i.imgur.com/ofO0Cur.jpg[/img][/center] [size=150][center][b][color=#0E316D]LSPD United Staff Member & Instructor[/color][/b] [color=#00FFFF][b]S.W.A.T. Master Sergeant[/b][/color][/size][/center] |
| [youtube]bkFxhTVb6eU[/youtube] | [img]https://media.giphy.com/media/HuNH9ntgLtWKI/giphy.gif[/img] |
xDeadlyKiller wrote: OT:Some other groups had their Vortex' replaced by other vehicles, I don't see why it's fair for Terrorists to keep it/have it while others are not allowed to?
The vortex is indeed a really deadly weapon, no doubt, and allowing it for all the groups would definitely be a bad idea. Terrorists had the vortex before this rule was in place, and at the same time, when the rule came, Terrorists still kept their vortex. I've no problem with Terrorists having vortex, nor do I have any problem with people that drive vortex, but the vortex definitely needs to be limited with rules, that's for sure.
xDeadlyKiller wrote:added option 'other' since there will always be people hating, they might choose that insteadSpoiler: showLet's have a calm discussion and stay within the forum rulesSpoiler: showForum Rules wrote:2. Avoid using caps lock.
OT:
The vortex is indeed a really deadly weapon, no doubt, and allowing it for all the groups would definitely be a bad idea. Terrorists had the vortex before this rule was in place, and at the same time, when the rule came, Terrorists still kept their vortex. I've no problem with Terrorists having vortex, nor do I have any problem with people that drive vortex, but the vortex definitely needs to be limited with rules, that's for sure.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests