Lsrcr Forum

dizzy50 wrote:

haha what do you want me to do? to show you footage of Assad going out of his royal castle to shell a village with chemical weapons?
come on sunday admit that assad did commit that chemical attack

That's the point, you can't prove anything. Syria is in a chaotic situation and intense fights happen everyday. There is no way you can determine who has done what in that chaos. The only "proof" USA has is that there were chemical weapons used. They do not have any proof who used them. Even if there was proof that Assad used chemical weapons I still wouldn't approve USA attacking Syria. USA is not the "world police" and so far all their interventions in the mid-east brought only more blood, hate and fear. People are getting killed everyday in Syria, it matters little is it by chemical weapons or bullets, they all die in the end. It's a huge tragedy and the best thing we can do is offer refuge for people who wish to leave Syria. Attacking Syria would only spill more blood and spread more hate. Nothing good would come out of this. The US government needs to realise that peace can be achieved only through understanding and mercy, not by more hate and war. If over 60 percent of americans openly disapprove the attack on Syria it's Obama's duty not to launch the attack. If he does attack Syria, even after the majority said otherwise, that would be a direct crime against democracy. "Hands off Syria", in the name of the people.

*Sunday* wrote:

dizzy50 wrote:

haha what do you want me to do? to show you footage of Assad going out of his royal castle to shell a village with chemical weapons?
come on sunday admit that assad did commit that chemical attack

That's the point, you can't prove anything. Syria is in a chaotic situation and intense fights happen everyday. There is no way you can determine who has done what in that chaos. The only "proof" USA has is that there were chemical weapons used. They do not have any proof who used them. Even if there was proof that Assad used chemical weapons I still wouldn't approve USA attacking Syria. USA is not the "world police" and so far all their interventions in the mid-east brought only more blood, hate and fear. People are getting killed everyday in Syria, it matters little is it by chemical weapons or bullets, they all die in the end. It's a huge tragedy and the best thing we can do is offer refuge for people who wish to leave Syria. Attacking Syria would only spill more blood and spread more hate. Nothing good would come out of this. The US government needs to realise that peace can be achieved only through understanding and mercy, not by more hate and war. If over 60 percent of americans openly disapprove the attack on Syria it's Obama's duty not to launch the attack. If he does attack Syria, even after the majority said otherwise, that would be a direct crime against democracy. "Hands off Syria", in the name of the people.

sunday imagine one day in beautiful croatia, in the village you're living in a war has started between your citizen friends and between the government army.your kid and your wife died from a chemical illegal weapons that were used by the government and you became a homeless since your house was air raided by the government and NO ONE helped you or planned to help you how would it feel? try to imagine what is it going through hell and what is complaining about "crimes against democracy" behind a screen while you can go and play soccer at zagreb kids in damascus are praying to god to send them a piece of bread to eat

Also notice that Damascus ( Capital city of Syria ) is an important city in Islam, like Jersualem and Makkah ( The Ka'abah ).
When those 3 cities gets destroyed which 2 are already are and were we will get an world crisis and not in economy but in another view which non muslims wont understand. Also notice that the Ka'abah will get destroyed by an Abyssinian leader.

Reda wrote:

Also notice that Damascus ( Capital city of Syria ) is an important city in Islam, like Jersualem and Makkah ( The Ka'abah ).
When those 3 cities gets destroyed which 2 are already are and were we will get an world crisis and not in economy but in another view which non muslims wont understand. Also notice that the Ka'abah will get destroyed by an Abyssinian leader.

Jerusalem won't be destroyed as long as it is on the israel side

dizzy50 wrote:

Reda wrote:

Also notice that Damascus ( Capital city of Syria ) is an important city in Islam, like Jersualem and Makkah ( The Ka'abah ).
When those 3 cities gets destroyed which 2 are already are and were we will get an world crisis and not in economy but in another view which non muslims wont understand. Also notice that the Ka'abah will get destroyed by an Abyssinian leader.

Jerusalem won't be destroyed as long as it is on the israel side

Israel isnt even an country.

Reda wrote:

dizzy50 wrote:

Reda wrote:

Also notice that Damascus ( Capital city of Syria ) is an important city in Islam, like Jersualem and Makkah ( The Ka'abah ).
When those 3 cities gets destroyed which 2 are already are and were we will get an world crisis and not in economy but in another view which non muslims wont understand. Also notice that the Ka'abah will get destroyed by an Abyssinian leader.

Jerusalem won't be destroyed as long as it is on the israel side

Israel isnt even an country.

It is my blind friend http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel

dizzy50 wrote:

*Sunday* wrote:

dizzy50 wrote:

haha what do you want me to do? to show you footage of Assad going out of his royal castle to shell a village with chemical weapons?
come on sunday admit that assad did commit that chemical attack

That's the point, you can't prove anything. Syria is in a chaotic situation and intense fights happen everyday. There is no way you can determine who has done what in that chaos. The only "proof" USA has is that there were chemical weapons used. They do not have any proof who used them. Even if there was proof that Assad used chemical weapons I still wouldn't approve USA attacking Syria. USA is not the "world police" and so far all their interventions in the mid-east brought only more blood, hate and fear. People are getting killed everyday in Syria, it matters little is it by chemical weapons or bullets, they all die in the end. It's a huge tragedy and the best thing we can do is offer refuge for people who wish to leave Syria. Attacking Syria would only spill more blood and spread more hate. Nothing good would come out of this. The US government needs to realise that peace can be achieved only through understanding and mercy, not by more hate and war. If over 60 percent of americans openly disapprove the attack on Syria it's Obama's duty not to launch the attack. If he does attack Syria, even after the majority said otherwise, that would be a direct crime against democracy. "Hands off Syria", in the name of the people.

sunday imagine one day in beautiful croatia, in the village you're living in a war has started between your citizen friends and between the government army.your kid and your wife died from a chemical illegal weapons that were used by the government and you became a homeless since your house was air raided by the government and NO ONE helped you or planned to help you how would it feel? try to imagine what is it going through hell and what is complaining about "crimes against democracy" behind a screen while you can go and play soccer at zagreb kids in damascus are praying to god to send them a piece of bread to eat

Do not say a word about my town. Croatia was fighting an independence war just 20 years ago and my town was under attack as well. There are still remains from that war: houses in ruins, bullet and shrapnel marks on walls... Everyone who fought that war would tell you "never again". It doesn't matter who the enemy is, lives are lost and that's the true tragedy. You're not a better person than them if you want to kill the enemy for revenge. The war in Syria needs to stop. Blood and iron won't stop it, of that I am certain.

*Sunday* wrote:

Do not say a word about my town. Croatia was fighting an independence war just 20 years ago and my town was under attack as well. There are still remains from that war: houses in ruins, bullet and shrapnel marks on walls... Everyone who fought that war would tell you "never again". It doesn't matter who the enemy is, lives are lost and that's the true tragedy. You're not a better person than them if you want to kill the enemy for revenge. The war in Syria needs to stop. Blood and iron won't stop it, of that I am certain.

dude you were this little . when it happened so you don't have a case plus was there a chemical weaponry used in your town? no
we're you guys complaining against war? yes. did some one help? i think it was USA but im not sure
so what will stop it? please answer me what will stop the war?

dizzy50 wrote:

*Sunday* wrote:

Do not say a word about my town. Croatia was fighting an independence war just 20 years ago and my town was under attack as well. There are still remains from that war: houses in ruins, bullet and shrapnel marks on walls... Everyone who fought that war would tell you "never again". It doesn't matter who the enemy is, lives are lost and that's the true tragedy. You're not a better person than them if you want to kill the enemy for revenge. The war in Syria needs to stop. Blood and iron won't stop it, of that I am certain.

dude you were this little . when it happened so you don't have a case plus was there a chemical weaponry used in your town? no
we're you guys complaining against war? yes. did some one help? i think it was USA but im not sure
so what will stop it? please answer me what will stop the war?

I wasn't even born when the war started and ended but I know a lot about it. My father fought in that war and we learn a lot about it in school. And why does it matter do people die from chemical weapons or not? It doesn't make a difference, in the end they all die one way or other. Killing people is a crime no matter what and there is no difference are bullets or chemical weapons used. We didn't receive any help from the USA nor anybody else. Croatia didn't even have proper weapons when the war started! We had to smuggle weapons on the borders to equip our forces.

I don't know how to stop the war. However, I know one thing; more war and death won't surely stop it. USA and everybody else needs to keep their hands of Syria and the situation will settle if given enough time. The only thing we can do is try to lower the amount of deaths by offering the civilians refuge. Bombarding Syria will only cause more deaths.

*Sunday* wrote:

dizzy50 wrote:

*Sunday* wrote:

Do not say a word about my town. Croatia was fighting an independence war just 20 years ago and my town was under attack as well. There are still remains from that war: houses in ruins, bullet and shrapnel marks on walls... Everyone who fought that war would tell you "never again". It doesn't matter who the enemy is, lives are lost and that's the true tragedy. You're not a better person than them if you want to kill the enemy for revenge. The war in Syria needs to stop. Blood and iron won't stop it, of that I am certain.

dude you were this little . when it happened so you don't have a case plus was there a chemical weaponry used in your town? no
we're you guys complaining against war? yes. did some one help? i think it was USA but im not sure
so what will stop it? please answer me what will stop the war?

I wasn't even born when the war started and ended but I know a lot about it. My father fought in that war and we learn a lot about it in school. And why does it matter do people die from chemical weapons or not? It doesn't make a difference, in the end they all die one way or other. Killing people is a crime no matter what and there is no difference are bullets or chemical weapons used. We didn't receive any help from the USA nor anybody else. Croatia didn't even have proper weapons when the war started! We had to smuggle weapons on the borders to equip our forces.

I don't know how to stop the war. However, I know one thing; more war and death won't surely stop it. USA and everybody else needs to keep their hands of Syria and the situation will settle if given enough time. The only thing we can do is try to lower the amount of deaths by offering the civilians refuge. Bombarding Syria will only cause more deaths.

if you don't know how to settle the end of the war how can you deny a possible option of USA involvement?