Remove Vortex from groups (ADDED POLL)

[Mr.DollarMan]

Added poll, please vote

It's useless because we already know how many haters we got and you guys will try your best to gain the full support.
Making a poll and then trying to prove that majority is under you guys. Smart move but quite old.

[Kaosx234]

[quote="Kaosx234”]You failed to answer my question. Would you rather like go with same skin without fancy vehicles and drug spawn or you would rather join in the same skin with those fancy vehicle and drug spawn. The answer is the 2nd option (unless someone is brain damaged). Why? Because fancy vehicles = vortex => people most of the time apply for a group which has something fancy in it => here we go again the Terrorist group.
Why would someone apply for another group if Terrorists have everything what other groups have + other stuff.

I would rather go for both of them. By asking questions again and again what do you want to provew hen you failed to argue with me? Seems like you are brain damaged because I would choose both of the ways. Yes, vortex is one of the reasons but not the major reason, that’s what you will never admit to.
[quote="Kaosx234”]You are implying that you cannot destroy tank whatsoever? Not even when you are orange? Well I won't talk here about your or mine's skills, but in case you are orange, tank should not be the problem.[/quote]
No, I didn’t say that nor I meant that. I compared it with vortex, which you couldn’t understand.
[quote="Kaosx234”]Simple question: can Terrorists be warned if they shoot innocent people? Nope (they do not get terrorist warn). Can Army, which shoot by the tank, that shoot civilians be warned? Yes, not one warning but two.[/quote]
They don’t get warned because civilians don’t completely die because of vortex shooting and besides that they will get auto-disarmed which is equal to a warning and annoying. Disarm is the solution for it.
Will the tank user get disarmed while shooting innocent? No. while a vortex user will. Compare things sensibly.
[quote="Kaosx234”]Do you really thing that the water cannon is an OP vehicle? If you do, there are some issues with you, seriously. I still want to see "special vehicles" in SWAT, thanks. Every of the stuff has its rule. Yes, we are skilled because you guys prove that point, /q when you see us . Insulting a fellow faction is a great way to show how mature you are.[/quote]
It’s is not OP, you said special vehicle and I named it. Other than that it’s a bit OP as well, if you keep on using the water canon on the criminal he/she can’t standup and move and in the meanwhile you guys can cuff and arrest them.
Hahaha! if you guys would be skilled you wouldn’t have been crying the way you are crying right now. If you are complaing about the /q thing then let me tell you it isn’t against the rule that’s why we do it and if you guys were skilled then you wouldn’t have choose swat.

[quote="Kaosx234”]You really enjoy pay2win games, don't you? Parent's cash is the best cash , a famous quote, eh. Anyway, I don't want to see this server pay2win, that is why I am posting here in the first place.[/quote]
Hahahaha, that’s where you proved your immaturity again. I own my own business, I spend my own money, I guess you are still in the stage of using your pocket money. Haha.
[quote="Kaosx234”]How am I dragging other things here? If you are continuously attacking the same person and you spawn at PD where he spawns, you are not letting him play his game. I doubt if you could write that in my language since you are having problem with typing in English. That case was in SWAT base, and SWAT base - as far as I know - has gates.[/quote]
LOL. If a LEO continuously arrests or kills the same criminal will it be considered as bitching? If no then same goes for the cop hunting and for this I provided you a proof also.
No, I can type this whole thing in your language and explain it to you. I’m not having in writing English here and I think once you lost a bet against me on some sentence, don’t you. Or was it neutral, maybe we both were right on that thing. So better not to taunt me for English.

[quote="Kaosx234”]Which "facts" brought me down, lol?[/quote]
Act like you don’t know. LOL.
[quote="Kaosx234”]I am the father of the tactic how to defeat a vortex. Anyone who is using the car-shield tactics - uses owing to me. It is not problem 1 vortex, it is problem when 1 person constantly attacks you, you cannot go for another suspect because, once again I'll repeat myself, he will simply come and DB your ass (while you do not pay attention on anyone but the suspect).[/quote]
Seems like you don’t have enough skills to wrecked 2 vortex with your members at the same time. We never complained when you guys come as a team and kill one single player of us by using all of your means and tactics, so why are you guys now even with your so called skills?
[quote="Kaosx234”]Didn't you call me "not a big boy", who went off the topic here, again. You are being funny at the moment. I don't need any screenshot since this is not a rulebreak but simply shows your immaturity towards this community.
I see that you are not arguing a lot with people, because you simply cannot say "wreck" after each of your post, smh. I just know that you're not arguing a lot, not sure whether or not am I king.[/quote]

I didn’t go off the topic, I replied to what you quoted, I stuck to the topic. Indeed you are, that’s what I proved and that’s what you proved by yourself.
[quote="Kaosx234”]Successful in what? In wasting your parent's cash? Yes, you are very successful there. You are the only one who tries to go off topic and I simply reply back/[/quote]
LOL, again immaturity here, I spend my money, not like you to survive on your parent’s cash. Hahaha.
Omg, how funny is it that you think this way. xD
I’m the only one who goes off the topic? Lmao. Look at my replies and then look at yours and some players here can also judge that who’s going off topic here. Replying to your off the topic comments is what you call going off topic.

I’m loving it more!

Sorry about not qouting it correctly i hope you can manage to read it that way, at least you can do that. lol[/quote][/quote]
Nope, if you want me to reply I won't search what did you previously say and what did you say now. It's not hard to use function quote, at least it does not require a high IQ but yet people fail.

[Accursed]

Added poll, please vote

It's useless because we already know how many haters we got and you guys will try your best to gain the full support.
Making a poll and then trying to prove that majority is under you guys. Smart move but quite old.

Its not about the haters or what. Carl giving his suggestion to the server, if you don't agree with it just vote no. Easy for you right ?

[BoSS]

You are comparing SWAT bomb to Vortex? lol.

[Mr.DollarMan]

Nope, if you want me to reply I won't search what did you previously say and what did you say now. It's not hard to use function quote, at least it does not require a high IQ but yet people fail.

Don't find excuses, when you are running out of an argument, It has been fixed. Now reply back.

[Mr.DollarMan]

You are comparing SWAT bomb to Vortex? lol.

That's what happen when you don't read the whole post and comment. LOL.

[Mr.DollarMan]

Its not about the haters or what. Carl giving his suggestion to the server, if you don't agree with it just vote no. Easy for you right ?

The situation has to be justified and we have to give a reason for it and if someone is trying to act smart then it should be exposed. Like now you are trying to act smart here. Isn't it easy for you to post your suggestion and leave, you want to poke your nose in between?

[Drastic]

I have decided to offer a replacement for the Vortex to groups that already have it. They may choose any vehicle to replace their Vortex provided the area has enough space to accommodate their vehicle of choice.

It has also been decided that no more Vortexes will be approved.

Moreover, I've also decided to look into this problem and I shall make sure that the use of the vehicle is discouraged by means of altering the way the auto-aim works on it.

[Carl_J]

I have decided to offer a replacement for the Vortex to groups that already have it. They may choose any vehicle to replace their Vortex provided the area has enough space to accommodate their vehicle of choice.

It has also been decided that no more Vortexes will be approved.

Moreover, I've also decided to look into this problem and I shall make sure that the use of the vehicle is discouraged by means of altering the way the auto-aim works on it.

YESSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thank you Drastic!

[Jed]

I have decided to offer a replacement for the Vortex to groups that already have it. They may choose any vehicle to replace their Vortex provided the area has enough space to accommodate their vehicle of choice.

It has also been decided that no more Vortexes will be approved.

Moreover, I've also decided to look into this problem and I shall make sure that the use of the vehicle is discouraged by means of altering the way the auto-aim works on it.

YESSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thank you Drastic!