
Moderators: Suggestions helpers, Developers
I would rather go for both of them. By asking questions again and again what do you want to provew hen you failed to argue with me? Seems like you are brain damaged because I would choose both of the ways. Yes, vortex is one of the reasons but not the major reason, that’s what you will never admit to.So, you would rather go in civilian skin than Terrorist skin if you can do in Terrorist skin EVERYTHING what you can do in civilian skin + loads of different things. Can I ask you, why?
No, I didn’t say that nor I meant that. I compared it with vortex, which you couldn’t understand.If vortex had 10k HP (or if tank had 1k HP as in back times), I could match vortex with tank. When tank had 1k HP, it had rules, just for your information.
They don’t get warned because civilians don’t completely die because of vortex shooting and besides that they will get auto-disarmed which is equal to a warning and annoying. Disarm is the solution for it.The tank doesn't kill innocent at first too. You are implying that auto-disarm => possibility to be kicked from a faction/group? Do you even read what do you say?
Will the tank user get disarmed while shooting innocent? No. while a vortex user will. Compare things sensibly.
It’s is not OP, you said special vehicle and I named it. Other than that it’s a bit OP as well, if you keep on using the water canon on the criminal he/she can’t standup and move and in the meanwhile you guys can cuff and arrest them.Let me quote your first sentence and the 2nd one »It’s is not OP, you said special vehicle and I named it. Other than that it’s a bit OP as well,«. Make up your mind, is it OP or it is not OP (in your opinion). Furthermore, it is not a special vehicle since police do have that vehicle too. Third, it is not OP at all.
Hahaha! if you guys would be skilled you wouldn’t have been crying the way you are crying right now. If you are complaing about the /q thing then let me tell you it isn’t against the rule that’s why we do it and if you guys were skilled then you wouldn’t have choose swat.
Hahahaha, that’s where you proved your immaturity again. I own my own business, I spend my own money, I guess you are still in the stage of using your pocket money. Haha.If you knew that I do not have parents and that I have loads of cash in my inventory, I bet you wouldn't post this, haha. I bet you own your own business. If you were, you would not play here, would you? I wonder what do you do in your business.
LOL. If an LEO continuously arrests or kills the same criminal, will it be considered as bitching? If not, then the same goes for the cop hunting and for this I provided you a proofalso.Those are just basic mistakes you've made. I didn't want to correct your all paragraphs because I simply do not want. If an LEO arrests you, you become again civilian. If you do not want to be chased - you do not commit warrants. If you commit warrants, it is your own fault.
No, I can type this whole thing in your language and explain it to you.I’m not having in writing English here(This part has no meaning) and I think once you lost a bet against me on some sentence, don’t you. Or was it neutral, maybe we both were right on that thing. So better not to taunt me for English.
Seems like you don’t have enough skills to wrecked 2 vortex with your members at the same time. We never complained when you guys come as a team and kill one single player of us by using all of your means and tactics, so why are you guys now even with your so called skills?There are no tactics to destroy 2 vortexes if you are the only person (unless there are civilians nearby). I never complained when you guys came as a team and killed one single player of us using all of your means and tactics.
I didn’t go off the topic, I replied to what you quoted, I stuck to the topic. Indeed you are, that’s what I proved and that’s what you proved by yourself.Glad that you do not go off-topic anymore. You learned this lesson boy.![]()
LOL, again immaturity here, I spend my money, not like you to survive on your parent’s cash. Hahaha.I am surviving alone in this world (with my brother only). I am pretty much happy when my life, 2nd year of college, got already summer job, sometimes I do classes, pretty much a good life. Good luck going off-topic mate.
Omg, how funny is it that you think this way. xD
I’m the only one who goes off the topic? Lmao. Look at my replies and then look at yours and some players here can also judge that who’s going off topic here. Replying to your off the topic comments is what you call going off topic.

Zoroark wrote:I've given people in game moneyHis life is fulfilled now
Drastic wrote:I have decided to offer a replacement for the Vortex to groups that already have it. They may choose any vehicle to replace their Vortex provided the area has enough space to accommodate their vehicle of choice.Very nice, add /bc /q rule, now remove vortex, what's next? Disable free weapons for bounty hunter? Or injections for cops when spawn?
It has also been decided that no more Vortexes will be approved.
Moreover, I've also decided to look into this problem and I shall make sure that the use of the vehicle is discouraged by means of altering the way the auto-aim works on it.
Faraon78910 wrote:Minority will cry, majority will be happy.Drastic wrote:I have decided to offer a replacement for the Vortex to groups that already have it. They may choose any vehicle to replace their Vortex provided the area has enough space to accommodate their vehicle of choice.Very nice, add /bc /q rule, now remove vortex, what's next? Disable free weapons for bounty hunter? Or injections for cops when spawn?
It has also been decided that no more Vortexes will be approved.
Moreover, I've also decided to look into this problem and I shall make sure that the use of the vehicle is discouraged by means of altering the way the auto-aim works on it.
You started your job as senior very bad.

Zoroark wrote:I've given people in game moneyHis life is fulfilled now
Kaosx234 wrote:gotta agree ^Faraon78910 wrote:Minority will cry, majority will be happy.Drastic wrote:I have decided to offer a replacement for the Vortex to groups that already have it. They may choose any vehicle to replace their Vortex provided the area has enough space to accommodate their vehicle of choice.Very nice, add /bc /q rule, now remove vortex, what's next? Disable free weapons for bounty hunter? Or injections for cops when spawn?
It has also been decided that no more Vortexes will be approved.
Moreover, I've also decided to look into this problem and I shall make sure that the use of the vehicle is discouraged by means of altering the way the auto-aim works on it.
You started your job as senior very bad.
Any change that implements in the server/forum will be bad for few people and will be good for most of the people.
Drastic, you are doing great.

Kaosx234 wrote:So, you would rather go in civilian skin than Terrorist skin if you can do in Terrorist skin EVERYTHING what you can do in civilian skin + loads of different things. Can I ask you, why?You failed to understand my answer 3 times that's your fault not mine, your communication level is way to less then I expected.
I asked you this question 3 times where you failed to answer 2 times, in this case, only you are a bit of... yeah.
Kaosx234 wrote:If vortex had 10k HP (or if tank had 1k HP as in back times), I could match vortex with tank. When tank had 1k HP, it had rules, just for your information.You only see the HP difference in between them? lol. You will ignore all other comparable things but just compare the HP? Hahaha. I gave you the real comparison and yet you couldn't give me one good comparison.
Kaosx234 wrote:The tank doesn't kill innocent at first too. You are implying that auto-disarm => possibility to be kicked from a faction/group? Do you even read what do you say?It does kill, they are not mad to make a rule for a tank then. No i'm not implying that you are the guy who is thinking that way, What I said is beyond your understanding level. See my last comment.
Kaosx234 wrote:Let me quote your first sentence and the 2nd one »It’s is not OP, you said special vehicle and I named it. Other than that it’s a bit OP as well,«. Make up your mind, is it OP or it is not OP (in your opinion). Furthermore, it is not a special vehicle since police do have that vehicle too. Third, it is not OP at all.You asked me whether there is a special vehicle in Swat or not and I said you have and I named it. It's not completely OP as I told you why would I consider it a bit OP.
Skills do not have anything related with the /q issue. If I was Rambo, I couldn't stop you with typing /q after the /bc or nowadays if you are in a vehicle. I am always up for a challenge to see who is actually unskilled user, you or me. Just for the notice, in the poll who was/is the best driver, most of the people said my name, while I didn't see any of your name. If you want to 1v1 me, buzz me in-game. + I bet you wouldnt be able to finish SWAT driving route since all what you have is a big tongue.
Kaosx234 wrote:If you knew that I do not have parents and that I have loads of cash in my inventory, I bet you wouldn't post this, haha. I bet you own your own business. If you were, you would not play here, would you? I wonder what do you do in your business.Sorry, I didn't know that you don't have Parents, If I would have known this I wouldn't have wrote this. But as for the business, I do GOLD business. I Import and export GOLD that's what my business is.
Kaosx234 wrote:Those are just basic mistakes you've made. I didn't want to correct your all paragraphs because I simply do not want. If an LEO arrests you, you become again civilian. If you do not want to be chased - you do not commit warrants. If you commit warrants, it is your own fault.It's same as I said before, take it in the opposite way and consider it as a criminal. If the rules go for criminals then it also goes for LEO.
Kaosx234 wrote:Glad that you do not go off-topic anymore. You learned this lesson boy.You are the one who went off topic since the beginning. Do you mind checking the replies?
Kaosx234 wrote:I am surviving alone in this world (with my brother only). I am pretty much happy when my life, 2nd year of college, got already summer job, sometimes I do classes, pretty much a good life. Good luck going off-topic mate.I kinda feel sad here as well as want to reply back. Business is always better than Jobs. That would be enough I guess, since I don't want to sound rude here.
Kaosx234 wrote:Thanks Drastic, I think my job is done here, I won again. Gg Dollarman.Haha, no you haven't yet Kaosx, you didn't read Drastic's reply properly. He said he has offered to change the vehicles and I still have a choice to whether accept that offer or not, wait for his finals words, then we can decide weather you win or I.

Kaosx234 wrote:Even though I rarely use the Vortex, I don't see that a good update. You do realize what happened when Tamer disabled the vortex drive-by shooting? Most of the players disagreed and the update was discarded.Faraon78910 wrote:Minority will cry, majority will be happy.Drastic wrote:I have decided to offer a replacement for the Vortex to groups that already have it. They may choose any vehicle to replace their Vortex provided the area has enough space to accommodate their vehicle of choice.Very nice, add /bc /q rule, now remove vortex, what's next? Disable free weapons for bounty hunter? Or injections for cops when spawn?
It has also been decided that no more Vortexes will be approved.
Moreover, I've also decided to look into this problem and I shall make sure that the use of the vehicle is discouraged by means of altering the way the auto-aim works on it.
You started your job as senior very bad.
Any change that implements in the server/forum will be bad for few people and will be good for most of the people.
Drastic, you are doing great.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests