
OsamaAbouelhassan wrote:Hosting events for the members only? well it's nice but will be complicated in the playing world, and it won't be nice to create an event and force other staff not to create an event till ours is over and it will be boring since a few will participate, 34 members from the same group won't be online at the same time I guess, sothe current system is better imo1. There are no complications in the event world.
Guntimer wrote:Understood, +1 then.OsamaAbouelhassan wrote:Hosting events for the members only? well it's nice but will be complicated in the playing world, and it won't be nice to create an event and force other staff not to create an event till ours is over and it will be boring since a few will participate, 34 members from the same group won't be online at the same time I guess, sothe current system is better imo1. There are no complications in the event world.
2. Other staff can still make their events in their own event world.
3. We won't ONLY host for ourselves. This is just a side thing so that when there are FUN members online and we don't want the whole server in, we'll host one amongst ourselves. We're still a server wide group.


Guntimer wrote:Discuss this with us before you make your decision, please ... in my opinion, we just need something to do like a duty or something, for example, creating unofficial events and thinking of new ideas for events.Guys.
I'm thinking about closing down FUN.


OsamaAbouelhassan wrote:+1Guntimer wrote:Discuss this with us before you make your decision, please ... in my opinion, we just need something to do like a duty or something, for example, creating unofficial events and thinking of new ideas for events.Guys.
I'm thinking about closing down FUN.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest