We use cookies to ensure the best experience for you on our website. By using this website you accept our use of cookies. Ok Read more

Los Santos Roleplay Cops and Robbers
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Information
    • Beginners Tutorial
    • Server Rules
    • Privacy Policy
    • Server Map
  • Statistics
    • Top 25
    • Most Active
    • Server Stats
    • Top Score
    • Groups
    • Turf Stats
  • UCP
    • Dashboard
    • Profile
    • Messaging
    • Houses
    • Vehicles
    • Donation Items
    • Transfers
    • Tag Area
    • Support
    • Logs
  • Shop
    • Shop page
    • Donation items
    • Wearables
    • Memberships
    • Vehicle Addons
    • Vehicles
    • Houses
    • Apartments
    • Groups
    • Get Points
  • Donate
  • Game (UCP) Sign in
Lsrcr Forum • Hydroelectricity or Nuclear energy? - Page 3

Lsrcr Forum

Los Santos Roleplay Cops and Robbers
https://ls-rcr.com/forum/

Hydroelectricity or Nuclear energy?

https://ls-rcr.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=12042

Page 3 of 3

Re: Hydroelectricity or Nuclear energy?

Posted: November 24, 2011, 10:22 am
by Talhagamer
Mitk0 wrote:
What you are talking about will never be possible. In the desert there is sand and there is also wind. This will stop the panels from being effective. They can't be cleaned that often because there are constant winds. Also, we can never run out of nuclear material, since there is a chemical process to make radioactive elements. Make a research about it. Also lemme put it this way, 1 gram of uranium can emit more energy than the entire sahara desert with panels ( assuming they are cleaned, which is very unlikely ) for a 1000 years. Not to mention plutonium which is by far the most radioactive element that exists on the planet earth.
But then again, Nuclear energy has its side effects too. If you don't take proper care of it, you'd be screwed real BAD.

Re: Hydroelectricity or Nuclear energy?

Posted: November 24, 2011, 10:47 am
by Cheese
Moose wrote:
kamuran wrote:
Solar energy is free. (ignoring the cost of setting it up)
It's available for more than 300 days a year where I live, the Mid East won't take advantage of it.
I agree why dont they do that in middle east

Deserts are free, just use those spots for power.
Yeah, imagine solar panels over the whole Sahara Desert.[/quote]

Yeah, imagine how mad they'd be when they see their expensive stuff getting eaten by a sandstorm

Re: Hydroelectricity or Nuclear energy?

Posted: November 24, 2011, 12:13 pm
by Moose
Cheese wrote:
Yeah, imagine how mad they'd be when they see their expensive stuff getting eaten by a sandstorm
LOL
could be made strong enough.

Re: Hydroelectricity or Nuclear energy?

Posted: November 24, 2011, 7:20 pm
by kamuran
Moose wrote:
Cheese wrote:
Yeah, imagine how mad they'd be when they see their expensive stuff getting eaten by a sandstorm
LOL
could be made strong enough.
True :D


What about wind energy guys ?

There are some places in world that is perfect.

Re: Hydroelectricity or Nuclear energy?

Posted: November 25, 2011, 9:12 am
by Cheese
kamuran wrote:
Moose wrote:
Cheese wrote:
Yeah, imagine how mad they'd be when they see their expensive stuff getting eaten by a sandstorm
LOL
could be made strong enough.
True :D


What about wind energy guys ?

There are some places in world that is perfect.
I asked my biology teacher today, and he said windmills are more effective in deserts than solar power.

All times are UTC
Page 3 of 3
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
https://www.phpbb.com/