Lsrcr Forum

Are you replacing the 30 minutes timer with 7 days? If so then why will all the warnings be given by considering 30 minutes rule?

Ambiguous Suggestion
Cant understand what you are trying to say.

Wajeeh wrote:

I was thinking of completely removing the time limit, but still truncate rows that are 7 days or older meaning that there's a 7 day timer.

So you are removing the time limit. Okay. What's the 7 day timer for? There's ambiguity in your suggestion, please explain!

There is no time limit any more on the jail evade and hit evade checks. Jail evade will give penalty jail time and hit evade will give hit duration penalty time.

However, we will try to keep the table size in check by deleting rows that are older than 7 days when the gamemode loads. This means that if you jail or hit evade, the record of this will be deleted the first server restart after 7 days.

BeaTen. wrote:

Are you replacing the 30 minutes timer with 7 days? If so then why will all the warnings be given by considering 30 minutes rule?

Because we can't force players to stay if they really have to go. I did explain this in my topic. We can't have a 7 day timer on such a rule, but we can have the jail and hit evade system affect players for 7 days. Because we can't give warnings to a player who really has to go but the system changes won't have such an impact on the rule.

CXdur wrote:

BeaTen. wrote:

Are you replacing the 30 minutes timer with 7 days? If so then why will all the warnings be given by considering 30 minutes rule?

Because we can't force players to stay if they really have to go. I did explain this in my topic. We can't have a 7 day timer on such a rule, but we can have the jail and hit evade system affect players for 7 days. Because we can't give warnings to a player who really has to go but the system changes won't have such an impact on the rule.

Agree, it's a shame forcing players or not allowing them to do something they want. It's just a game after all lol.

fair enough, +1

1+

Will be implemented.