Lsrcr Forum

[Lsrcr]Jed wrote:

Yoennie wrote:

Continueing to prove my point.

Yes,you can go on and continue somewhere where you can learn English.Fool.

Oh my bad super troll, here it's actually Continuing* Woah!

You still prove my point though c:

[Lsrcr]Jed wrote:

Yoennie wrote:

Continueing to prove my point.

Yes,you can go on and continue somewhere where you can learn English.Fool.

Speak for yourself.

[Lsrcr]Jed wrote:

Faraon78910 wrote:

whoever unbanned you im suprised

Staff who don't care.He'll end up being remember like Tal is,it's just a matter of time.

[Lsrcr]Demon. wrote:

[Lsrcr]Jed wrote:

Yoennie wrote:

Continueing to prove my point.

Yes,you can go on and continue somewhere where you can learn English.Fool.

Speak for yourself.

[Lsrcr]Jed wrote:

Faraon78910 wrote:

whoever unbanned you im suprised

Staff who don't care.He'll end up being remember like Tal is,it's just a matter of time.

Yeah,I forgot to put the ed on the back since I erased it by accident.But he made an obvious mistake by putting e instead of a.By the way,you're not his lawyer,so don't try to defend him.

Yoennie wrote:

[Lsrcr]Jed wrote:

Yoennie wrote:

Continueing to prove my point.

Yes,you can go on and continue somewhere where you can learn English.Fool.

Oh my bad super troll, here it's actually Continuing* Woah!

You still prove my point though c:

What's your point?What point do I have to acknowledge from you,other than being homosexual and looking like a girl?

[Lsrcr]Jed wrote:

Lmao...voting for tag is simple,we don't need to write fucking novels for our reason...and admins don't even look at the votes,they accept newbies with 1-2 months of playing while ex-tagged and old members get denied for no reason-in other words they accept/deny whoever they want.This suggestion is useless.

[Lsrcr]Kurtiso wrote:

I support this to be done. Because most of our current tagged players just vote with like 6 words or even less. So if the 'Tag system' was changed to something similar to what StormWind posted, it will make the applicants more aware of what their wrong move was and how to improve it. Instead of getting a vote just like "Bad attitude, etc...", it should be more detailed with some kind of guides in it.

I agree with both?

[Lsrcr]Jed wrote:

Yeah,I forgot to put the ed on the back since I erased it by accident.But he made an obvious mistake by putting e instead of a.By the way,you're not his lawyer,so don't try to defend him.

Maybe he pressed E instead of A by accident, you never know.

Further discussions & arguments causing issues will result in a locked topic or deleted replies.

Okay so let's find the solution then.

Solution #1:

No player should have the ability to vote on tag applications.The admins themselves will decide who deserves the tag and who doesn't.

Solution #2:

Players who just got the tag cannot vote.They have to be tagged for (insert here) months in order to vote on tag applications.

Solution #3:

Admins vote on people who they think should accept tag applications.Those people must be respected and have a lot of experience.There should be the main person and the rest of the group.The main person can disband any one of them if he thinks that person sucks at doing his job.


So.What do you guys think?

[Lsrcr]Jed wrote:

Okay so let's find the solution then.

Solution #1:

No player should have the ability to vote on tag applications.The admins themselves will decide who deserves the tag and who doesn't.

Solution #2:

Players who just got the tag cannot vote.They have to be tagged for (insert here) months in order to vote on tag applications.

Solution #3:

Admins vote on people who they think should accept tag applications.Those people must be respected and have a lot of experience.There should be the main person and the rest of the group.The main person can disband any one of them if he thinks that person sucks at doing his job.


So.What do you guys think?

the person that actually votes / decide is the admin. what you say or think there is irrelevant.
example: there are 20 positive votes, 3 negative votes. one admin vote for negative.
so 20 yes, 4 no. if so he should be accepted yet admin deny it. this so called vote system is an illusion. "admin" vote should not be "better" / "higher",

with adding these 7 characters to someone's name. you expect him to be experienced with game stuff, speak good English and have a good attitude. you expect to look at someone over a week or 20 minutes then see if he meets the requirements. lol. you surely can't make a conclusion by looking at its cover.

this whole idea is stupid. if someone is mature / want to help other ppl in game / etc he can do it without those 7 characters, no need for you to tell what someone can do.

[Lsrcr]Jed wrote:

Okay so let's find the solution then.

Solution #1:

No player should have the ability to vote on tag applications.The admins themselves will decide who deserves the tag and who doesn't.

Solution #2:

Players who just got the tag cannot vote.They have to be tagged for (insert here) months in order to vote on tag applications.

Solution #3:

Admins vote on people who they think should accept tag applications.Those people must be respected and have a lot of experience.There should be the main person and the rest of the group.The main person can disband any one of them if he thinks that person sucks at doing his job.


So.What do you guys think?

I like how u think