
Moderator: S.A. Army Generals
JohnCarer wrote:Here is a living proof of my argument: viewtopic.php?f=27&t=60031You don't understand, if he goes inactive just post inactivity check that you going inactive 3 months and you don't need to do shit. Easy and simple.
Everyone would think he'd never return, yet I always know that oldies and seniors always return, but simply cannot dedicate as much time as they used to when they were children. Below's a statement of a respected Ex-General, who with much more experience, sees things through a different angle.
This game has hit a point where its been out for far too many years and many people do not hold the same sentiment they once had towards it. If I go inactive for a period of time, I shouldn't have to keep checking in. When I come back, I should be able to still play like I once did. Problem with most people is that they think this game is so serious that one must be either 100 percent committed or they are not committed enough.
Faraon78910 wrote:JohnCarer wrote:Here is a living proof of my argument: viewtopic.php?f=27&t=60031You don't understand, if he goes inactive just post inactivity check that you going inactive 3 months and you don't need to do shit. Easy and simple.
Everyone would think he'd never return, yet I always know that oldies and seniors always return, but simply cannot dedicate as much time as they used to when they were children. Below's a statement of a respected Ex-General, who with much more experience, sees things through a different angle.
This game has hit a point where its been out for far too many years and many people do not hold the same sentiment they once had towards it. If I go inactive for a period of time, I shouldn't have to keep checking in. When I come back, I should be able to still play like I once did. Problem with most people is that they think this game is so serious that one must be either 100 percent committed or they are not committed enough.




Shepherd_Dog wrote:Their names are not for decorating memberlist, They're same as retired officer and they didn't checked their in-activity.We are an online social community, not North Korea. Standing on that list will not harm any neither will it give someone an advantage.
They should have a punishment doing this but AHC doesn't care. and you saying that those members about majority, Are they trying to famous the memberlist? huh cool appreciate it.
Did you see someone respond on their inactivity check?


Shepherd_Dog wrote:I am not pointing on yourself well. otherwise, these are your job I won't to argue yourself.Argueing can be something good, dont worry about hurting me

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest