Lsrcr Forum

JohnCarer wrote:

Here is a living proof of my argument: viewtopic.php?f=27&t=60031
Everyone would think he'd never return, yet I always know that oldies and seniors always return, but simply cannot dedicate as much time as they used to when they were children. Below's a statement of a respected Ex-General, who with much more experience, sees things through a different angle.

This game has hit a point where its been out for far too many years and many people do not hold the same sentiment they once had towards it. If I go inactive for a period of time, I shouldn't have to keep checking in. When I come back, I should be able to still play like I once did. Problem with most people is that they think this game is so serious that one must be either 100 percent committed or they are not committed enough.

You don't understand, if he goes inactive just post inactivity check that you going inactive 3 months and you don't need to do shit. Easy and simple.

Faraon78910 wrote:

JohnCarer wrote:

Here is a living proof of my argument: viewtopic.php?f=27&t=60031
Everyone would think he'd never return, yet I always know that oldies and seniors always return, but simply cannot dedicate as much time as they used to when they were children. Below's a statement of a respected Ex-General, who with much more experience, sees things through a different angle.

This game has hit a point where its been out for far too many years and many people do not hold the same sentiment they once had towards it. If I go inactive for a period of time, I shouldn't have to keep checking in. When I come back, I should be able to still play like I once did. Problem with most people is that they think this game is so serious that one must be either 100 percent committed or they are not committed enough.

You don't understand, if he goes inactive just post inactivity check that you going inactive 3 months and you don't need to do shit. Easy and simple.

But as I know,if you spend 3 montsh you can't post again in "going inactive"....I read somewhere only 3 months is allowed to be inactive,and what then ? What if I even don't have acces to inter a couple of months,what then ? Like this guy who was one year in army school or whatever is. I still think we even don't need chek points.I am staying with JohnCarer

Bump

If they care they would reply here and say -1 but seems like they don't
Because of that we got some army members inactive very much, looks this one, last seen 174 days ago but still on memberlist https://ls-rcr.com/user/[Lsrcr]Big_Boss but he is not only one...

Nein min Ein!

We added this rule witch does not kick you automaticly after not responding once with a reason.

As JC mentioned in his comment, we are a group of friends playing the same game and having atleast one thing in common.
How awesome would you think it is, you ve been unable to play fir a while and you wanna chill again with your ig friends. You dont have to wait out an application as you can still rock n roll with your mates.

Inactivity check is good as it is right now.

This is true, All of the in-active members are still alive in memberlist even they aren't ever seen in game. It should be direct kick/demote than warnings. Few are below
[Lsrcr]Uncen. (Our lovely training officer)
[Lsrcr]Anonymous
[Lsrcr]Blind (Joined army, became TO and ran away)
Table (I don't know the truth? He's permanent banned but he's still living with his own rank wow we're doin' well)
Carlos_Jimene (Well well)
[Lsrcr]Logic (Magic)
[Lsrcr]Cheez (Jeez)
[Lsrcr]Michael
[Lsrcr]Taser (Banned but still alive in memberlist, Maybe AHC's are waiting for his death)
[Lsrcr]Big_Boss
[Lsrcr]Smax
[Lsrcr]Gouveia
[Lsrcr]Smiley (Last seen 244 days ago. Well)
[Lsrcr]Maniiac
[Lsrcr]Mentorex
[Lsrcr]Contract
I suggest AHC/GENERAL and everyone, Don't accept useless guys who are lazy and leaving after accepted however if he's TO/AHC. We're sleeping nowadays

May i ask, what is actauly the problem aboutt having some members inactive?

Its looking good at the memberlist + they seem to respond to the checks. Majority of the people you listen are guys who were active or either had done work for the S A Army.

See em as statue(s), majority deserverd their names on the list.

Their names are not for decorating memberlist, They're same as retired officer and they didn't checked their in-activity.
They should have a punishment doing this but AHC doesn't care. and you saying that those members about majority, Are they trying to famous the memberlist? huh cool appreciate it.
Did you see someone respond on their inactivity check?

Shepherd_Dog wrote:

Their names are not for decorating memberlist, They're same as retired officer and they didn't checked their in-activity.
They should have a punishment doing this but AHC doesn't care. and you saying that those members about majority, Are they trying to famous the memberlist? huh cool appreciate it.
Did you see someone respond on their inactivity check?

We are an online social community, not North Korea. Standing on that list will not harm any neither will it give someone an advantage.

Saying ahc does not care is IMO a scream for attention. Maybe they do care but do they have other thoughs about it.

Take me for an example, in the last 3 months i barely played 10 hours in total. Witch makes me inactive, i aint no 200 days but those days wont change my work i once did for army.

I am not pointing on yourself well. otherwise, these are your job I won't to argue yourself.

Shepherd_Dog wrote:

I am not pointing on yourself well. otherwise, these are your job I won't to argue yourself.

Argueing can be something good, dont worry about hurting me
Aslong as arguments are held with respect i do encourage them.