We use cookies to ensure the best experience for you on our website. By using this website you accept our use of cookies. Ok Read more

Los Santos Roleplay Cops and Robbers
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Information
    • Beginners Tutorial
    • Server Rules
    • Privacy Policy
    • Server Map
  • Statistics
    • Top 25
    • Most Active
    • Server Stats
    • Top Score
    • Groups
    • Turf Stats
  • UCP
    • Dashboard
    • Profile
    • Messaging
    • Houses
    • Vehicles
    • Donation Items
    • Transfers
    • Tag Area
    • Support
    • Logs
  • Shop
    • Shop page
    • Donation items
    • Wearables
    • Memberships
    • Vehicle Addons
    • Vehicles
    • Houses
    • Apartments
    • Groups
    • Get Points
  • Donate
  • Game (UCP) Sign in
Lsrcr Forum • New Rule - Page 4

Lsrcr Forum

Los Santos Roleplay Cops and Robbers
https://ls-rcr.com/forum/

New Rule

https://ls-rcr.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=74153

Page 4 of 4

Re: New Rule

Posted: July 28, 2016, 12:24 pm
by Razer531
I'm not going to argue with Robin anymore since he's annoying as fuck because he comes, says something, I say something back, and avoids the argument, YET posts something. I'm just waiting for kaos or sunday, only people who are good at discussing because they never avoid people's arguments and actually reply to them.

EDIT: And the reason WHY I hate what Robin is doing is because I am wasting my time to construct an argument I hope Robin will reply to.

Re: New Rule

Posted: July 28, 2016, 1:35 pm
by Mastro
So if I suggested a rule that would state: "DM isn't allowed", you'd say:"(like seriously, we can't dm someone for fun etc just because he's getting chased/chasing someone?)
It's not the same thing. We also have an anti-dm system that prevents you from damaging some specific players e.g cops can't damage whites and vice versa.
So if I suggested a rule that would state: "DM isn't allowed", you'd say:"and new players will break this rule again and again. You can't have 'fair fights' in a CnR server, get that. You will get DM-ed, carparked during a fight/chase.
And also Mastro, you aren't thinking AT ALL when making the list:rammed, carjacked, arrested, robbed, raped.
Ramming, carjacking by INNOCENTS during the fight shouldn't be allowed, but arrests, robbs, rapes, kidnaps are COMPLETELY DIFFERENT. Ramming by innocents shouldn't be allowed because they're IRRELEVANT, while arrests can be done because you're simply wanted, so that may be done, and robberies and rapes are something that is REGULARLY ALLOWED.
Ramming and carjacking by innocents should NOT be REGULARLY ALLOWED when you're performing some LSRCR NATURE fights: hitted/hitman, crim/LEO etc. You're COMPLETELY misunderstanding EVERYTHING, Mastro.
Once again, DM-ing and ramming is not the same thing. How can you know if someone rammed you on purpose or just because his driving skills are terrible? How can you know if someone rammed you on purpose or just because he tried to avoid someone else? Will you just go and report him on the forums?

And how can you prove he actually rammed you? Will you be recording 24/7 or what? Also, what if I am also getting chased, I am desperate and I need a car right away? I will try to car-jack you and the same exact thing would happen IRL aswell. You can't have fair fights in a CnR server, you simply, can't.
What the fuck?
Innocent carjacks you and because of an irrelevant innocent you get arrested.
"it doesn't necessarily mean he tried to help that cop." - Mastro 2016
Meant he to help that cop or not, he is ruining the gameplay, because again, for the 1000000th time, AN IRRELEVANT INNOCENT IS GIVING AN ADVANTAGE TO A RELEVANT SIDE OF A FIGHT OF THE LSRCR NATURE.
COMPLETELY LOGICALLY unfair.
You can't limit their/our freedom that much. We already have many rules we should follow and adding one more, that is unnecessary and difficult to get implemented, will be destructive.

Re: New Rule

Posted: July 28, 2016, 3:04 pm
by Zoroark
Mastro wrote:
You can't limit their/our freedom that much. We already have many rules we should follow and adding one more, that is unnecessary and difficult to get implemented, will be destructive.

Re: New Rule

Posted: July 28, 2016, 6:30 pm
by Hawk
With this rule there would need lots of other sub-rules included... like "white can't run over crims" etc.. I like to do it, it is very funny to do randomly.

Re: New Rule

Posted: July 30, 2016, 12:24 pm
by CXdur
This will not be added, several good reasons have been stated in this topic.

All times are UTC
Page 4 of 4
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
https://www.phpbb.com/