Lsrcr Forum

CyClon3 wrote:

The thing is, the moment someone uses /bc, they are free from the LEO and have earned freedom unlike /taze. Adding this rule could make gameplay really unbalanced with LEOs being able to catch wanteds, I know it might not seem RP or fair but I think the criminal has the right to escape in whatever way they wish as long as they have broken the cuffs, I mean who cares this isn't a proper RP server and there are usually several more criminals you can catch. Also, there will be a rise of report hunting if there's no scripted punishment = players become demoralised = worse community. However, I see your point Nitro as it does give an unfair advantage + ruin experience.

Neutral

CyClon3 wrote:

The thing is, the moment someone uses /bc, they are free from the LEO and have earned freedom unlike /taze. Adding this rule could make gameplay really unbalanced with LEOs being able to catch wanteds, I know it might not seem RP or fair but I think the criminal has the right to escape in whatever way they wish as long as they have broken the cuffs, I mean who cares this isn't a proper RP server and there are usually several more criminals you can catch. Also, there will be a rise of report hunting if there's no scripted punishment = players become demoralised = worse community. However, I see your point Nitro as it does give an unfair advantage + ruin experience.

Neutral

[Lsrcr]Nitro wrote:

Suggestion headline: Make /q evading after /bc reportable

CyClon3 wrote:

[Lsrcr]Nitro wrote:

Suggestion headline: Make /q evading after /bc reportable

@Kaos
Your first point is not relating to the topic, I was talking about leaving after a successful escape. /Q while being cuffed is a different story that no one has discussed so far (including me).

Back to what you said about my "weak" arguments: no, it's currently not abusing the system as it's not a rule, it's not even an unwritten rule but an exception to the system that people use, if people should be allowed to use it or not is what we're trying to discuss here. No need to make this personal, people are sharing their opinions.

1. People were (recently) punished for doing the same thing from Admins
2. Ask Johnson if he wanted to see people quitting just after they broke the cuffs (you can also ask this question Seniors (not ASAs)

Aleksa wrote:

Could you tell me, where do you see logic there?
If you don't want to be arrested or something, buy jailcards or don't be criminal at all. Where is the 'cops and robbers'?

[Lsrcr]Nitro wrote:

I usually don't say this but, I think any of you who think this is legit because you can't escape SWAT or because you don't want jail time. Let me tell you a tiny secret, something which I have been told a long time ago by some SWAT member, "if you don't want to be arrested and wait jail time, don't commit crimes." to simplify, if you become a criminal you should be god damn ready to be arrested because if a cop had come to arrest you, you wouldn't have a chance to try escaping. Another point I stand for is that in reality when you get arrested by the police you usually have zero chance of escaping once you are in the same car with cops, let alone even break their cuffs. I like the 10 seconds without taze and I think it could work, maybe make it so the suspect is cuffable after t seconds and tazeable within 10 or 13 seconds.