Lsrcr Forum

[Lsrcr]T_Rex wrote:

-1
It's just a game, not a real life.

If that's the case let's remove the rules and get everyone to use hacks, it's just a game. No?
Please use a logical reason so you may contribute to the discussion.

CyClon3 wrote:

The thing is, the moment someone uses /bc, they are free from the LEO and have earned freedom unlike /taze. Adding this rule could make gameplay really unbalanced with LEOs being able to catch wanteds, I know it might not seem RP or fair but I think the criminal has the right to escape in whatever way they wish as long as they have broken the cuffs, I mean who cares this isn't a proper RP server and there are usually several more criminals you can catch. Also, there will be a rise of report hunting if there's no scripted punishment = players become demoralised = worse community. However, I see your point Nitro as it does give an unfair advantage + ruin experience.

Neutral

I understand and respect your opinion but I think there are better ways to make escaping easier such as setting a taze cooldown to someone who broke cuffs. Let's not forget that if you would get caught by a cop you won't even have a chance to break cuffs and q in time without getting auto jailed unlike when you are caught by swat, you have a chance to escape and just to clarify, people did manage to escape, you only need to be smart about the way you do it.

I guess its a rule now:

viewtopic.php?f=11&t=66300

BoSS wrote:

I guess its a rule now:

viewtopic.php?f=11&t=66300

It all varies on the Admin. Needs to be an official rule or I am not satisfied.

Kaosx234 wrote:

BoSS wrote:

I guess its a rule now:

viewtopic.php?f=11&t=66300

It all varies on the Admin. Needs to be an official rule or I am not satisfied.

That's the thing .. half the rules vary between admins. Wish they were actually stricter through.

BoSS wrote:

Kaosx234 wrote:

BoSS wrote:

I guess its a rule now:

viewtopic.php?f=11&t=66300

It all varies on the Admin. Needs to be an official rule or I am not satisfied.

That's the thing .. half the rules vary between admins. Wish they were actually stricter through.

I am talking about, if Admin does that - it is allowed and if someone does that to Admin it is not allowed. Let's make it not allowed at all.

Kaosx234 wrote:

I am talking about, if Admin does that - it is allowed and if someone does that to Admin it is not allowed.

Hmm it is easier to a new player being banned for rulebreaking than an old/experienced member. The same thing happens to the admins. If someone reports an administrator (with a valid proof), a Senior administrator will warn him before taking his rights because if that admin was promoted to the server staff, it was because higher admins saw him as an experienced and loyal member and they will probably think that it was an aaccident, which won't happen again. Otherwise, his rights will be removed, for sure.
It's what I think, mate

BisonKills wrote:

Kaosx234 wrote:

I am talking about, if Admin does that - it is allowed and if someone does that to Admin it is not allowed.

Hmm it is easier to a new player being banned for rulebreaking than an old/experienced member. The same thing happens to the admins. If someone reports an administrator (with a valid proof), a Senior administrator will warn him before taking his rights because if that admin was promoted to the server staff, it was because higher admins saw him as an experienced and loyal member and they will probably think that it was an aaccident, which won't happen again. Otherwise, his rights will be removed, for sure.
It's what I think, mate

How can you accidentally do /q abuse?

He is saying:

/q no please no alca

Jokes aside, I want an admin to respond about the warning issued to Fury for q abuse. Does that mean q abuse is not allowed?