Lsrcr Forum

Jobin wrote:

+1
Not because im supporter, i believe its needed, as there is not staff online most of the times and hackers are all around. This will be nice idea /votekick.

Community supporters have been selected by the staff team IE: They're trusted.

Make it so they have to start a votekick and then other players may then /votekick people?

Then it'd stop people joining with friends and votekicking everyone.

Why so much hassle about having a simple vote kick?
I suggest that /votekick would have votes only from the community supporters rather than having the player's voting.
IF they try to kick a normal player to have a laugh, they will surely get removed as I do know that admins in LS-RCR are quite strict. Consequently, it will not be abused 100%!
I really suggest that this would pass, because I like to play smoothly and not wait until an admin goes online in order to play without any hackers / random bug(crashes) in the gameplay.

Supporters were chosen because they are well trusted by the admins and the community. I believe that they would do a great job!

Hawk wrote:

Why so much hassle about having a simple vote kick?
I suggest that /votekick would have votes only from the community supporters rather than having the player's voting.
IF they try to kick a normal player to have a laugh, they will surely get removed as I do know that admins in LS-RCR are quite strict. Consequently, it will not be abused 100%!
I really suggest that this would pass, because I like to play smoothly and not wait until an admin goes online in order to play without any hackers / random bug(crashes) in the gameplay.

Supporters were chosen because they are well trusted by the admins and the community. I believe that they would do a great job!

You're still so wise like a year ago..

Hawk wrote:

Spoiler: show

Why so much hassle about having a simple vote kick?
I suggest that /votekick would have votes only from the community supporters rather than having the player's voting.
IF they try to kick a normal player to have a laugh, they will surely get removed as I do know that admins in LS-RCR are quite strict. Consequently, it will not be abused 100%!
I really suggest that this would pass, because I like to play smoothly and not wait until an admin goes online in order to play without any hackers / random bug(crashes) in the gameplay.

Supporters were chosen because they are well trusted by the admins and the community. I believe that they would do a great job!

I agree with this. The only reason it'd be suggested for supporters only is because GTA V has a vote kick and when the CEO bullshit first came out you had people abusing vote kick to get in public sessions with only their friends. That is because to do anything with your organization you are forced to be in a public session.

It takes like 4 or 5 votes to get you kicked for "Bad behavior" yet the game is based around criminal activity (ironic isn't it)

A CEO can have 6 people in their organization so you see where the issue is right?


However in LSRCR people could use it to troll if it was given to everyone so to prevent that you make it for supporters and apply strict rules for the feature.


It would help because I had encountered hackers many times when admins were not online, they'd spawn exploding cars, TP to me and /rob along with speed hacking to ram me to death.

A lot of those are hard to get screenshots of and my computer couldent record anything. If Lacky wasn't online telling Aleska to ban them they'd be there for a while ruining everyone's gameplay.


Like vote kick is not meant for the shit like keybines and aimbot but for the obvious guy who's TPing everywhere and spawning random shit that the autoban fails to recognize.

However I added an idea to where there must be a report in the forums with solid proof before the /votekick is initiated so that way you have a backup to prove your reason for kicking the obvious hacker.

The second suggested rule is that if a mod or an admin are online that means the supporters can't use vote kick since there is no reason to and so that it doesn't take away from their authority.


I'm not even a supporter and I want this just so when I am able get online I don't have to deal with not being able to go to LS or LV due to a hacker. (Cause they don't always go to SF since not many people are usually there)



Just my view on it. However I'd like to see what the admins say about this since the community is devided on the suggestion.

I agree with you, but I just have one question regarding this part

However I added an idea to where there must be a report in the forums with solid proof before the /votekick is initiated so that way you have a backup to prove your reason for kicking the obvious hacker.

Few lines before that you said:

It would help because I had encountered hackers many times when admins were not online, they'd spawn exploding cars, TP to me and /rob along with speed hacking to ram me to death.

A lot of those are hard to get screenshots of and my computer couldent record anything. If Lacky wasn't online telling Aleska to ban them they'd be there for a while ruining everyone's gameplay.

If it is hard to get proofs of these hacks, how are we supposed to get them then? In that case, we would rarely be allowed to use /votekick according to your suggestion.

Jaker wrote:

Spoiler: show

Zoroark wrote:

Spoiler: show

I agree with this. The only reason it'd be suggested for supporters only is because GTA V has a vote kick and when the CEO bullshit first came out you had people abusing vote kick to get in public sessions with only their friends. That is because to do anything with your organization you are forced to be in a public session.

It takes like 4 or 5 votes to get you kicked for "Bad behavior" yet the game is based around criminal activity (ironic isn't it)

A CEO can have 6 people in their organization so you see where the issue is right?


However in LSRCR people could use it to troll if it was given to everyone so to prevent that you make it for supporters and apply strict rules for the feature.


It would help because I had encountered hackers many times when admins were not online, they'd spawn exploding cars, TP to me and /rob along with speed hacking to ram me to death.

A lot of those are hard to get screenshots of and my computer couldent record anything. If Lacky wasn't online telling Aleska to ban them they'd be there for a while ruining everyone's gameplay.


Like vote kick is not meant for the shit like keybines and aimbot but for the obvious guy who's TPing everywhere and spawning random shit that the autoban fails to recognize.

However I added an idea to where there must be a report in the forums with solid proof before the /votekick is initiated so that way you have a backup to prove your reason for kicking the obvious hacker.

The second suggested rule is that if a mod or an admin are online that means the supporters can't use vote kick since there is no reason to and so that it doesn't take away from their authority.


I'm not even a supporter and I want this just so when I am able get online I don't have to deal with not being able to go to LS or LV due to a hacker. (Cause they don't always go to SF since not many people are usually there)



Just my view on it. However I'd like to see what the admins say about this since the community is devided on the suggestion.

I agree with you, but I just have one question regarding this part

However I added an idea to where there must be a report in the forums with solid proof before the /votekick is initiated so that way you have a backup to prove your reason for kicking the obvious hacker.

Few lines before that you said:

It would help because I had encountered hackers many times when admins were not online, they'd spawn exploding cars, TP to me and /rob along with speed hacking to ram me to death.

A lot of those are hard to get screenshots of and my computer couldent record anything. If Lacky wasn't online telling Aleska to ban them they'd be there for a while ruining everyone's gameplay.

If it is hard to get proofs of these hacks, how are we supposed to get them then? In that case, we would rarely be allowed to use /votekick according to your suggestion.

A lot of people can record, I could not so I ended up having to just ask others to get an admin or record whatever they could see.

I said it's hard to report via screen shot because often times a screenshot isn't always enough. Like for a flying air broken car then it's obvious but something like a speed hack is a different story along with no reload unless you /time stamp and take a shitload of screenshots. TP hack can sometimes be valid only if you timestamp and do /loc every second.


So basically I'm saying if you can't record it's hard to report, I couldn't record.


My main way of reporting was /ask Admin come and spectate me please. Fishy shit over here.


However the main reason for the report is because you need evidence as to the reason why you guys voted to have that player kicked.

If someone else reported first, view their video and use that as a reference if it's valid.

Whoever says supporters are elected by staff team so they are trusted is wrong. They are ACCEPTED not selected. You can know the difference on google. Supporters are answering other's question which a regular player( not supporter) can do on the mainchat. Adding such commands to the supporters makes them special than regular players, supporters were made for answering questions and to be as similar as regular players so adding such commands adds supporters to the chain of command and we obviously don't need a new rank. Lsrcr has always been full of hackers and it comes from time to time that hsckers come in game everyday nut its just a period and shall end sooner or later, doing such huge step for regular players makes unbalance in the whole server, do you really need a bigger problem? The hackers will get bored sooner or later and I don't find a reason to make supporters special for a period of time lmao, onzie stated supporters are not special and will never be.

Nice Suggestion

+1 admins are not always on so hackers of dmers thrive so i agree with this and it can also help to kick rule breakers or insulters that will ruin the game peace and friendly state but i think after getting kicked a certain amount of time you should get a temporary ban

Hawk wrote:

Why so much hassle about having a simple vote kick?
I suggest that /votekick would have votes only from the community supporters rather than having the player's voting.
IF they try to kick a normal player to have a laugh, they will surely get removed as I do know that admins in LS-RCR are quite strict. Consequently, it will not be abused 100%!
I really suggest that this would pass, because I like to play smoothly and not wait until an admin goes online in order to play without any hackers / random bug(crashes) in the gameplay.

Supporters were chosen because they are well trusted by the admins and the community. I believe that they would do a great job!

they should make a reason to kick somone... /votekick id reason: hacking, rule breaking etc