bieber

This section is +18 and not for people who are easily offended. Respect other people's beliefs.
Forum rules
This section is not for people who are easily offended (hence 18+).
Respect other people's beliefs.
Material in this section may not be suitable for all audiences.
121 posts Page 10 of 13

*Sunday*

Sunday
Donator
Posts: 4371
Joined: July 15, 2011, 7:21 am
Location: Croatia

Post by *Sunday* » June 12, 2014, 6:45 am
[Lsrcr]PiPo wrote:
Hoe many keyboards are broken here allready is this argument?
42.
| S.A. Army Master Sergeant | Former S.W.A.T. Commander | Former Pagati Consigliere |
Image

Juice.

Juice
Posts: 1510
Joined: June 2, 2012, 10:25 pm
Location: USA, Home of the BRAVE!

Post by Juice. » June 12, 2014, 1:38 pm
Go learn boy, read the synonyms as well http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/intelligent

smart is a synonym of intelligent.


Once again I have proof and you have nothing.

You provided No link, as I already stated you couldn't do. Conversation terminated. Game over. You lose.

0 credits left.

Oh, Now everybody want to copy, right?
It's because Juice is the blueprint.
I bet you think I want your 2 cents.

:P: :RIGHTS; :O:
Image
Spoiler: show

*Sunday*

Sunday
Donator
Posts: 4371
Joined: July 15, 2011, 7:21 am
Location: Croatia

Post by *Sunday* » June 12, 2014, 7:01 pm
Juice. wrote:
Go learn boy, read the synonyms as well http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/intelligent

smart is a synonym of intelligent.


Once again I have proof and you have nothing.

You provided No link, as I already stated you couldn't do. Conversation terminated. Game over. You lose.

0 credits left.


Did you even read my last post? A link to an Internet dictionary means nothing to me (nor anybody else who actually uses their brains).

Smart is a synonym for intelligent for people who study linguistics. Smart is not a synonym for people who actually study human behavior. The latter one obviously have the advantage when it comes to what's right in this field. Please, if you don't actually study psychology don't throw in cheap dictionary proof and claim it's right. As I said, ask any person who has knowledge about psychology and they'll confirm my statement. Go ahead, don't be afraid to explore beyond your petty online dictionary.
| S.A. Army Master Sergeant | Former S.W.A.T. Commander | Former Pagati Consigliere |
Image

Jaker

User avatar
Jaker
Donator
Posts: 2203
Joined: January 12, 2013, 12:35 pm

Post by Jaker » June 12, 2014, 8:59 pm
*Sunday* wrote:
Kaosx234 wrote:
After we didn't listen to God, this world became mortal and so the life on it. There won't be any evil in the heaven. This life is just a test phase for us because we all betrayed our God. And yes, if you have no doubts abour religion, you've chose the wrong religion.
Exactly, that's what I'm trying to explain the whole time. Evil is not here to work against God but to help him to punish/test us. But for us humans, evil is bad and we should avoid it by all costs.
According to our beliefs, as God created us with immortal souls, so did he spiritual beings - angels. One of them, Satan, apostatized from the God and his main goal is to ruin our present and afterlives. What makes you possibly think God is a punisher/tester? Evil is NOT here to help God punish/test us. God is NOT a tester/punisher. God is a father who waits for his child to return open-hearted to him. Evil IS in fact here to work against God. Yes, God's almighty, but if he wanted to eliminate Satan, that would be contradictory to his principles, as he created every creature as a sign of his love(he is a God of love, not something else.

*Sunday*

Sunday
Donator
Posts: 4371
Joined: July 15, 2011, 7:21 am
Location: Croatia

Post by *Sunday* » June 13, 2014, 6:40 am
Fobos wrote:
*Sunday* wrote:
Kaosx234 wrote:
After we didn't listen to God, this world became mortal and so the life on it. There won't be any evil in the heaven. This life is just a test phase for us because we all betrayed our God. And yes, if you have no doubts abour religion, you've chose the wrong religion.
Exactly, that's what I'm trying to explain the whole time. Evil is not here to work against God but to help him to punish/test us. But for us humans, evil is bad and we should avoid it by all costs.
According to our beliefs, as God created us with immortal souls, so did he spiritual beings - angels. One of them, Satan, apostatized from the God and his main goal is to ruin our present and afterlives. What makes you possibly think God is a punisher/tester? Evil is NOT here to help God punish/test us. God is NOT a tester/punisher. God is a father who waits for his child to return open-hearted to him. Evil IS in fact here to work against God. Yes, God's almighty, but if he wanted to eliminate Satan, that would be contradictory to his principles, as he created every creature as a sign of his love(he is a God of love, not something else.
The only way to understand good is to understand evil. Many things in life are actually balances between two extremes and so is good and evil. Without evil good couldn't exist as well. Evil has a purpose of course.
| S.A. Army Master Sergeant | Former S.W.A.T. Commander | Former Pagati Consigliere |
Image

Tolis.

Tolis
Donator
Posts: 2618
Joined: November 17, 2012, 6:49 pm
Location: Greece

Post by Tolis. » June 13, 2014, 8:55 am
So my dad is part of the illuminati for smoking marloboro? :roll:

Image

Juice.

Juice
Posts: 1510
Joined: June 2, 2012, 10:25 pm
Location: USA, Home of the BRAVE!

Post by Juice. » June 13, 2014, 3:32 pm
[Lsrcr]Tolis. wrote:
So my dad is part of the illuminati for smoking marloboro? :roll:

Nope. He's just a victim to one of there human poisons.
Oh, Now everybody want to copy, right?
It's because Juice is the blueprint.
I bet you think I want your 2 cents.

:P: :RIGHTS; :O:
Image
Spoiler: show

Juice.

Juice
Posts: 1510
Joined: June 2, 2012, 10:25 pm
Location: USA, Home of the BRAVE!

Post by Juice. » June 13, 2014, 4:35 pm
[Lsrcr]PiPo wrote:
I honestly believe you are a wise man Juice. You know things others will never understand. I do admire this.
Thank you sir and I agree to a degree. There are really just people not knowing simple things saying linguistics (language) is not human behavior. We have people putting info vs info when the only way to fully understand is info + info + proof - bs = truth. There is no logical reason to speak with some. My 7 yr old nephew knows language is a part of human behavior. Sunday is mentally challenged and I apologize for calling him stupid. I see now that he wasn't trolling and being stupid. He was being his, mentally handicapped self.

He put psychology vs dictionary. While I have studied both for years.
He put human behavior vs linguistics. While I have studied these areas for years.

All information retained.

Some times you see me telling what words really mean. Like "try" leaves too much room to fail. Thus, this word means fail. You may hear someone say "I was trying to win"... They say it because they failed to win. Sunday over uses the word try if you read his posts. He's clearly failure prone. Failures have to try because they can't do.

He claims some psychology book he can't name or show me is his proof. He claims my online sources are weak. I guess he doesn't even realize that the Webster dictionary is the most respected in the world. Nor does he know it's world famous for the book version, not the website. If we need words to communicate and he doubts the dictionary, it only made since to silence him for life...

He said the dictionary fails because he looked up a variation of the word intelligent. When I look up intelligence like him I get the EXACT definition he got. The difference is I have the balls to post proof. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/intelligence

Oh, Now everybody want to copy, right?
It's because Juice is the blueprint.
I bet you think I want your 2 cents.

:P: :RIGHTS; :O:
Image
Spoiler: show

*Sunday*

Sunday
Donator
Posts: 4371
Joined: July 15, 2011, 7:21 am
Location: Croatia

Post by *Sunday* » June 13, 2014, 5:51 pm
Juice. wrote:
[Lsrcr]PiPo wrote:
I honestly believe you are a wise man Juice. You know things others will never understand. I do admire this.
Thank you sir and I agree to a degree. There are really just people not knowing simple things saying linguistics (language) is not human behavior. We have people putting info vs info when the only way to fully understand is info + info + proof - bs = truth. There is no logical reason to speak with some. My 7 yr old nephew knows language is a part of human behavior. Sunday is mentally challenged and I apologize for calling him stupid. I see now that he wasn't trolling and being stupid. He was being his, mentally handicapped self.

He put psychology vs dictionary. While I have studied both for years.
He put human behavior vs linguistics. While I have studied these areas for years.

All information retained.

Some times you see me telling what words really mean. Like "try" leaves too much room to fail. Thus, this word means fail. You may hear someone say "I was trying to win"... They say it because they failed to win. Sunday over uses the word try if you read his posts. He's clearly failure prone. Failures have to try because they can't do.

He claims some psychology book he can't name or show me is his proof. He claims my online sources are weak. I guess he doesn't even realize that the Webster dictionary is the most respected in the world. Nor does he know it's world famous for the book version, not the website. If we need words to communicate and he doubts the dictionary, it only made since to silence him for life...

He said the dictionary fails because he looked up a variation of the word intelligent. When I look up intelligence like him I get the EXACT definition he got. The difference is I have the balls to post proof. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/intelligence

Let me be as clear as possible. Psychologists (people who are actually experts and do research on such things, intelligence being one) say that being intelligent and being smart are two different things. How is it possible a person who studied psychology for years doesn't know this? These are the basics, you're either lying or your studies have been very bad.

So who do you trust? Actual psychologists or people who put together a dictionary? I believe psychologists have a much greater knowledge in that field than any person who made that dictionary does. I don't care how famous the dictionary is, they'll never be equal to people who are actually experts in studying intelligence.
| S.A. Army Master Sergeant | Former S.W.A.T. Commander | Former Pagati Consigliere |
Image

Juice.

Juice
Posts: 1510
Joined: June 2, 2012, 10:25 pm
Location: USA, Home of the BRAVE!

Post by Juice. » June 13, 2014, 7:55 pm
Well no matter who's right, we're discussing if I'm smart or intelligent. We are discussing if you are stupid or mentally challenged. So either way it sucks to be you. lolll
Oh, Now everybody want to copy, right?
It's because Juice is the blueprint.
I bet you think I want your 2 cents.

:P: :RIGHTS; :O:
Image
Spoiler: show
121 posts Page 10 of 13
Return to “Religion & Culture”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests