Virtual world for TOs/WOs [DENIED]
Posted: December 10, 2019, 10:35 pm
Your name: [Lsrcr]Fantastic
Suggestion headline: Allow TOs and WOs to conduct faction tests in a virtual world.
Importance of suggestion: 7/10
Why should it be accepted: Testing applicants for both SWAT and Army has become a burden as testers cannot conduct faction tests without at least being interrupted (and thus delayed) more than once. The suggestion calls for testers to be able to conduct faction tests in a virtual environment in the absence of any potential disruptors. This way not only can tests become far more reliable and depict the true image of an applicant's skills due to the creation of an environment where maximum performance is encouraged, but they can also become far more time-efficient.
I am aware a similar suggestion has been previously denied over fears the feature would be abused but any abuse of the feature would probably be an isolated incident that would be dealt with accordingly. Also, people not trusted to use server features sensibly should not be appointed TOs/WOs in the first place.
Let me know what you think.
Suggestion headline: Allow TOs and WOs to conduct faction tests in a virtual world.
Importance of suggestion: 7/10
Why should it be accepted: Testing applicants for both SWAT and Army has become a burden as testers cannot conduct faction tests without at least being interrupted (and thus delayed) more than once. The suggestion calls for testers to be able to conduct faction tests in a virtual environment in the absence of any potential disruptors. This way not only can tests become far more reliable and depict the true image of an applicant's skills due to the creation of an environment where maximum performance is encouraged, but they can also become far more time-efficient.
I am aware a similar suggestion has been previously denied over fears the feature would be abused but any abuse of the feature would probably be an isolated incident that would be dealt with accordingly. Also, people not trusted to use server features sensibly should not be appointed TOs/WOs in the first place.
Let me know what you think.
