Lsrcr Forum

Your name: _THE_SPY_
Suggestion headline: Remove that reason wich called 'Hit back'
Picture: Importance of suggestion: 8/10
Why should it be accepted: Hey there i am here with my suggestion that i hope it be accepted becuase it's really annyoing when someone Kill,Ram,Punch,Dm,ETC... you then when you place hit on him he place it back on you with reason 'Hit back' a lot of players placing hits on others with this fake reason!
And It makes it bad thing to place hits becuase there is some people who dont want to get hit on them and when they get rammed they place hit with reason 'Rammed me' but the rammer be fucken rude and place it back with fake reason 'Hit back'!! although it's his fualt in the first place and the player who got rammed didnt do anything wrong, the server rules allow him to place it!
P.S: I hope u understand what it mean to get hit with a fake reason ;it's kind of bitching!

I think hit reasons in general need reworked. One, hitback shouldnt be valid. And a few more reasons SHOULD be hit reasons. Trespassing (get out of my house or be killed), car jacking, and a few others.

Look at this from roleplay view. X player ordered a hitman to kill you. Hitman wouldn't kill/shoot you if X player hadn't placed a hit contract. X player is the reason you're going to get hurt. Therefore, you may place hit contract on X player.

And a few more reasons SHOULD be hit reasons. Trespassing (get out of my house or be killed), car jacking, and a few others.

Car jacking is valid hit reason. Just as 'damaging your vehicle.' is valid reason, attempting to steal your vehicle is even worse, therefore why shouldn't it be valid?
Trespassing - I'd say this is valid reason as well. This is literally Pagati's 'leave base' hit system. Even some groups have had rule if you don't leave their base after warning, you may receive a hit contract. However ask admin just to make sure

I'd say every action that hurt you, is going to hurt you or attempts to hurt you is considered valid hit contract reason.

Faraon78910 wrote:

Look at this from roleplay view. X player ordered a hitman to kill you. Hitman wouldn't kill/shoot you if X player hadn't placed a hit contract. X player is the reason you're going to get hurt. Therefore, you may place hit contract on X player.

And a few more reasons SHOULD be hit reasons. Trespassing (get out of my house or be killed), car jacking, and a few others.

Car jacking is valid hit reason. Just as 'damaging your vehicle.' is valid reason, attempting to steal your vehicle is even worse, therefore why shouldn't it be valid?
Trespassing - I'd say this is valid reason as well. This is literally Pagati's 'leave base' hit system. Even some groups have had rule if you don't leave their base after warning, you may receive a hit contract. However ask admin just to make sure

I'd say every action that hurt you, is going to hurt you or attempts to hurt you is considered valid hit contract reason.

Car jacking is valid? Well shit, time to hit a bunch of people!

But yes, trespassing needs to be a reason. Get out of my house, apartment, and gang base. If I say leave, and you don't, I should be able to hit. Or maybe even higher ranks/house owners should be able to fire upon intruders because Second Amendment.

Faraon78910 wrote:

Look at this from roleplay view. X player ordered a hitman to kill you. Hitman wouldn't kill/shoot you if X player hadn't placed a hit contract. X player is the reason you're going to get hurt. Therefore, you may place hit contract on X player.

x player wouldnt place a hit on me if i didn't hurt him, got it ?
So yeah, Hit back should be removed

Plus can everybody said Yes or No come type his reason becuase i am sure nobody have good reason to vote so they just vote and leave.

When you make a topic here or reply to a suggestion, you have to obey the section rules. This is not where you can drag your personal grudge towards another player or go off-topic.

Moreover, the simple replies like '+1', 'it's a bad idea' etc without a proper opinion and reason are considered invalid and will be deleted along with a forum warning followed by a ban. If you want to take part in the discussion, elaborate your opinion and state the reasons. As for now, all such replies have been removed.

-1 i will go with Negative! because hit back not invalid hit, and it's allowed to hit back, So i agree with faraon and karu's vote, I suggest you think before make a suggest

Hero.Dark wrote:

-1 i will go with Negative! because hit back not invalid hit, and it's allowed to hit back, So i agree with faraon and karu's vote, I suggest you think before make a suggest

Well it's valid for now and the reason i made this suggestion is same u saying!
how u can say negative with as such reason?
P.S. Karu saying it shouldnt be valid.
i suggest u to read correctly before speaking becuase ur reason is invalid as karthik said above this kind of reasons aint valid.
U just dont have anyreason to say negative u just say negative becuase u hates me.
if u dont have good reason to say positive or negative dont vote then.