Lsrcr Forum

EvolutionJr wrote:

But everyone will start killing people with deagle instead of dragging them so Neutral for now.

EvolutionJr wrote:

+1.

But everyone will start killing people with deagle instead of dragging them so Neutral for now.

Dani6 wrote:

Not really, those who i've seen trying to reach the Sniper achievement are polite & they /cuff when is possible, when isn't possible they do their best to kill with sniper, also there is a rule which clearly states that the achievement hunting isn't allowed, not much time ago, i saw a Kaosx's reply saying the same thing; we should /drag everytime when is possible, avoid killing if the chance of /drag is higher.
Can't remember the reply well but was similar.

EvolutionJr wrote:

Dani6 wrote:

Not really, those who i've seen trying to reach the Sniper achievement are polite & they /cuff when is possible, when isn't possible they do their best to kill with sniper, also there is a rule which clearly states that the achievement hunting isn't allowed, not much time ago, i saw a Kaosx's reply saying the same thing; we should /drag everytime when is possible, avoid killing if the chance of /drag is higher.
Can't remember the reply well but was similar.

I never attempted to kill a suspect, even when they're coming inside an interior(I usually rape them until they get out). Exception for suspect inside a locked car (And we'll get the pull command soon, so huehuehue swat OP).

I'm not going to mention their names, but there are some member who kills other SWAT member's suspect and "steals" their drag.

CyClon3 wrote:

I don't really like achievements in general as they change SWAT's motives. Well, this one is still decent - it's like any other, get a no. of kills in a wep and that's it, acceptable and not a problem. However, adding this can increase achiv. hunting (imagine: new achievement, all SWATs would be interested in getting it = less drags/teamwork). Neutral my friend - Dani!

Dani6 wrote:

CyClon3 wrote:

I don't really like achievements in general as they change SWAT's motives. Well, this one is still decent - it's like any other, get a no. of kills in a wep and that's it, acceptable and not a problem. However, adding this can increase achiv. hunting (imagine: new achievement, all SWATs would be interested in getting it = less drags/teamwork). Neutral my friend - Dani!

Felt like answering ( ):
I don't rememeber the date exactly, not long ago, i said that achievements actually can just be reached teamworking, the only thing that will change is the ammount drags (Also army became active once again & this week i've just seen like 2-4 SWAT members online, meanwhile around 5-8 Army members online, which decrearases the ammount of criminals around Los Santos), i haven't seen anyone killing ('stealing') suspects as S.W.A.T since i reached PFC rank (Couple of months ago), that is why i suggested this, also the S.W.A.T bank is getting active, is getting more money, jailcards, houses, better economy etc. So it would be more than a waste of time & hard work from our S.W.A.T Trader (Sunday) if we don't use the bank which only exchange items from event points, how is related the achievement with event points? To be honest, nowdays i see events hosted by Kaosx, some other times by our Staff members (Special S.W.A.T events) where it could be a chance to add event points as reward for the Winner.

Now that i've expressed my opinion, i also would like to add; atleast 25 percent of the team Is inactive (PFC list) and the other part of the Team is almost the double active (From 10 minutes to 20 [example]), they all are friendly (from what i've seen) so there is no problem with Teamworking & friendship, i've suggested the Achievement for some teamwork, not by losing /drags etc.
I was also thinking on suggest a rule that prevents the actual Achievement hunting but i'm way too busy in real life or in Groups, Applications, etc. to think on a detailed one to replace the actual rule which states; no boostin as in skin (Achievement hunt, score boost).

Seems like my reason of suggesting this isn't enough, well, i'm happy that atleast i have some opinions .