We use cookies to ensure the best experience for you on our website. By using this website you accept our use of cookies. Ok Read more

Los Santos Roleplay Cops and Robbers
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Information
    • Beginners Tutorial
    • Server Rules
    • Privacy Policy
    • Server Map
  • Statistics
    • Top 25
    • Most Active
    • Server Stats
    • Top Score
    • Groups
    • Turf Stats
  • UCP
    • Dashboard
    • Profile
    • Messaging
    • Houses
    • Vehicles
    • Donation Items
    • Transfers
    • Tag Area
    • Support
    • Logs
  • Shop
    • Shop page
    • Donation items
    • Wearables
    • Memberships
    • Vehicle Addons
    • Vehicles
    • Houses
    • Apartments
    • Groups
    • Get Points
  • Donate
  • Game (UCP) Sign in
Lsrcr Forum • Applications on-hold limits - Not approved

Lsrcr Forum

Los Santos Roleplay Cops and Robbers
https://ls-rcr.com/forum/

Applications on-hold limits - Not approved

https://ls-rcr.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=47633

Page 1 of 2

Applications on-hold limits - Not approved

Posted: September 21, 2014, 4:39 pm
by CyClon3
In-Game Name: [Lsrcr]CyClon3
Suggestion: Add a limit for how long and how many times an application can be on-hold. (e.g.: can be on-hold for 1 working week and only once.) Once they pass their limit, they should get auto-denied as usual. + Add this to FAQ.
Explanation: It will make sure an applicant has high activity and interest in SWAT.
Reason:
- It will encourage them to stay active and join the team. After, they can go inactive with an inactivity status. :P
- It will make sure their skills are at their highest, allowing them to do the test well.

Re: Applications on-hold limits

Posted: September 21, 2014, 4:49 pm
by Hilda
Applicants are not forced to be active 24/7 but i'm exaggerating your suggestion.
I Support this suggestion, it will give us knowledge on Applicants activity & will ensure for us that they will be playing constantly as S.W.A.T.

Re: Applications on-hold limits

Posted: September 21, 2014, 10:44 pm
by Hashish
Also adding on-hold category for moving on-hold apps.. will be easier to handle.

Re: Applications on-hold limits

Posted: September 22, 2014, 6:48 am
by Kaosx234
Hashish wrote:
Also adding on-hold category for moving on-hold apps.. will be easier to handle.
Easier for what?
It's not like we're having daily 10 applications to go on hold.

Re: Applications on-hold limits

Posted: September 22, 2014, 9:04 am
by Moiz Nouman
making an on-hold time limit will be good, so. +1

Re: Applications on-hold limits

Posted: September 22, 2014, 11:14 am
by Wajeeh
If applicant is on-hold for long time, Commander will surely deny him for being inactive.
For maximum 1 week on-hold time, +1

Re: Applications on-hold limits

Posted: September 24, 2014, 8:49 pm
by Fantastic
Ehh, I dont see why there should be a limitation on the on hold time. If a user kindly requests his application to be on hold, ofcourse there is some sort of a reason behind it. Ofcourse, if the applicant has been away or/and applicants application's on hold for an ridiculous amount of time, a Commander will ofcourse take action such as denying, opening or whatever the COM decides is the most appropriate action...

Neither ways, you have my neutral for now.

Re: Applications on-hold limits

Posted: September 25, 2014, 12:31 pm
by TripleH
Moiz Nouman wrote:
making an on-hold time limit will be good, so. +1

Re: Applications on-hold limits

Posted: September 25, 2014, 1:02 pm
by Kaosx234
Moiz Nouman wrote:
making an on-hold time limit will be good, so. +1
If I was Sunday, I wouldn't care for your post. You didn't even say reason why would you like it.

Re: Applications on-hold limits

Posted: September 25, 2014, 4:28 pm
by CyClon3
[Lsrcr]Fantastic wrote:
Ehh, I dont see why there should be a limitation on the on hold time. If a user kindly requests his application to be on hold, ofcourse there is some sort of a reason behind it. Ofcourse, if the applicant has been away or/and applicants application's on hold for an ridiculous amount of time, a Commander will ofcourse take action such as denying, opening or whatever the COM decides is the most appropriate action...

Neither ways, you have my neutral for now.
Hehe, good point - that's very valid.

All times are UTC
Page 1 of 2
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
https://www.phpbb.com/