/q after /bc reportable
Posted: January 23, 2016, 9:00 pm
Your name: [Lsrcr]Nitro
Suggestion headline: Make /q evading after /bc reportable
Importance of suggestion: 10/10
Why should it be accepted: Well, since I guess implementing new systems to catch /q evaders will be difficult, I suggest making it reportable until there will be a jail evade system for that. The rule will state that you must not /q within 10 seconds after you /bc, if you do, you can be reported and warned/banned for it (could depend on the number of warning for this reason). Now as for the reason of why /q after /bc should be reportable? Well it is a low and disgusting move to do, it ruins the other user's experience and gives you an unfair advantage over the cops. Another reason this should be considered jail evade is that just as if you would be /tazed and you would /q, you will receive jail time, there should be some punishment for using /q after /bc because it is practically the same as using /q after /taze. As for ways to gather proof against such act, a picture that shows someone used /bc and then used /q within 10 seconds (/timestamp or admin logs) and a picture showing he returned in less than 30 minutes.
#hope4implement
Suggestion headline: Make /q evading after /bc reportable
Importance of suggestion: 10/10
Why should it be accepted: Well, since I guess implementing new systems to catch /q evaders will be difficult, I suggest making it reportable until there will be a jail evade system for that. The rule will state that you must not /q within 10 seconds after you /bc, if you do, you can be reported and warned/banned for it (could depend on the number of warning for this reason). Now as for the reason of why /q after /bc should be reportable? Well it is a low and disgusting move to do, it ruins the other user's experience and gives you an unfair advantage over the cops. Another reason this should be considered jail evade is that just as if you would be /tazed and you would /q, you will receive jail time, there should be some punishment for using /q after /bc because it is practically the same as using /q after /taze. As for ways to gather proof against such act, a picture that shows someone used /bc and then used /q within 10 seconds (/timestamp or admin logs) and a picture showing he returned in less than 30 minutes.
#hope4implement