Lsrcr Forum

Your name: Car
Suggestion headline: 1. Remove the ability to cuff and arrest when being shocked and 2. remove the ability to shock/taze while being shocked/tazed
Picture: not needed
Importance of suggestion: 9/10
Why should it be accepted: 1.suggestion: Not only that it's unrealistic, that you cannot move yourself when being shocked but with some magic, at the same time you can cuff him and arrest him, but it's also very unfair. Two criminals can go 2v1 vs one cop and the cop will still be able , if he's quick enough to cuff and even arrest at least one of them WHILE being shocked before he gets 4-shot to death(IF he gets 4 shot to death, considering how some people are good at typing, like Carl_J).

2.suggestion: this way it'll be more realistic and it gets rid of unfairness when cop and criminal are shocking/tazing each other all the time and cop wins because he has infinite tazes. Simply put, the one who /tazes /shocks first, wins.That's both fair, AND realistic

Take note of: Lets take this situation. A and B are criminals, and C is cop. C tazes criminal. during the taze, A can't shock C untill the taze falls of(unless he gets cuffed), but B can shock C. Just to clarify myself.

then remove the ability to shock when being tazed??????

remove the ability to run after /taze, because in reallife you would lay down for the next minutes..

-1

Cannot /sh while being tazed.

e.e wrote:

remove the ability to run after /taze, because in reallife you would lay down for the next minutes..

-1

well irl when someone shocks you, you'd lay down for the next minutes but you also wouldn't be able to cuff and, especially arrest someone xd

Kaosx234 wrote:

Cannot /sh while being tazed.

Yes. And opposite should be added too. Cannot /taze while /sh.
This also relinquishes the unfairness when crim and cop are shock/taze-ing each other and the cop always wins because he has infinite tazes unlike criminal.

I'll therefore edit the suggestion.

Lolmomlol wrote:

then remove the ability to shock when being tazed??????

yes, i edited the suggestion

+1

+1

+1