Lsrcr Forum

EDIT by Robin:

Robin wrote:

The suggestion has been implemented, sort of, please read my final reply at the very end of the topic for details

---

Name: [Lsrcr]Policeofficer
Suggestion(s): Being a civilian and teaming with wanted-reportable or having permission to engage
Why would it be useful: Simply it will get some abusing things cleared!
Additional comments:
Well I as Army Second Lieutenant would not force anyone to play Army skin instead of criminal one if he's already soldier but I noticed some of players are higly against our team and our fellow members but at same time are members of team? I don't like that at all but as I said I can't force anyone to play skin.But anyhow it's their shame and I can openly ask them what are they doing in our member list?In applicant reason would say I like team,would like to serve etc.Looks like it's just rather:"let me be here too,why not.I want all I can get.I could use this sometimes".I don't look at this stuff like that,either you are one of us or not.Pretty simple.Don't meaning on players that are sometimes criminals and playing on their own,meaning on players intentionaly playing as organized criminal group while being our member.I respect Dollar cause of that he's criminal for ever and don't like us at all and I respect that.But once he will ask us to be member Idk what would I say...

Regarding to suggestion in that way some of players are violating our rules of engaing wanted players(some of the already our members).They pcik up purposely unwanted player to gain advantages and sensibly abusing the rights of Army rules.That's unacceptable from my side and I belive this should be change.Or let us right to engage suspects after suing them(unwanted have enough time to realize and move away from wanted) or let it be simply reportable as abusing rights of army officer.I am not for officers to let harm other unwanteds if they accidently found them in such situation.But intentionly runing toward each others or even worse teaming is abuse,you have to agree with that.Army has been made and given vehicles and rights for such situation,if you have all free hands to shoot at us and we can't use our vehicle then we would be cop skin.I want to say you guys are puting our vehicles useless and let us out of oportunity to fight while you simply kill us.This is especially related to situation against solderi driving tank.Five wanted caring one unwanted,intentionly hunting soldier to kill him while he have no chance of escape due to slow vehicle speed and no chance for fight back.I never meet inoccnece person who would help criminals.They'll move away from their business and let Law Enforcements do their job.If you help them you are same guilty as they are,logicly?

Also would like to get opportunity to let some players tell -put the ball down- If you are wanted and and some other unwanted players is near by do not teach us are we allowed to engage or not and let that responsibilty and care be our thing.Especially meaning while most wanted is engaged by sparrow.It's pretty simple vehcile to control same as his weapon.So if innocent is near by it doesn't mean we can't engage since we have clear aim pointed at one target,not case like hydra and tank where explosion may harm some near by players.

Note:Don't want to insult anyone by this but I belive we have to clear some things of playing and let our team be more realistic and less purposely abusable by organized criminal groups.Anyhow I stand behind any single word about soldiers joined us just for being counted but otherwise more against our team and rarely doing their duty,even worse against fellow members.It's all about LOYALITY and COMPATIBILTY but clearly some of you don't meet that term.It's clear that even tho you are on list you'll be never part of us with such additude and statements,sorry!

I would like to note that ANYONE starting a personal argument on this topic will be punished and their posts deleted.

Sorry mate but it is good as it is now. -1

If you're creating this suggestion because of the recent report made by me than I would like to clarify one thing: Army soldier who was chasing us with a tank had a hit contract & the hitman was teaming up with us.

Totally agreed with Policeofficer , He said it all.
+1

ackman wrote:

Sorry mate but it is good as it is now. -1

If you're creating this suggestion because of the recent report made by me than I would like to clarify one thing: Army soldier who was chasing us with a tank had a hit contract & the hitman was teaming up with us.

Why would hitman as non wanted player team with multiply wanted suspect in first case??? I like those skin and Paggati even more.If hitman isn't ready to kill player who has been hited by his own then he can team up with other one.On your case you guys clearly hit him and team thogether just to get more opportunities to kill soldier since then hitamn could harm him and only thing he had left is to wait in vehicle to be hunted and executed.Where is the logic here? Abusing rights of Army officers like this is pretty simple same if it play cop skin.What are Army made for then I wonder if it would've same rights and same weapons to use as police skin...
I would not create this suggestion but since many of players are become to abuse this thing involving them selves into army-criminal battle on purpose while being white/unwanted,I stand up for my members that are loyal to their team and put up some things which are pretty unlogic and actually making no sense of it.

I didn't read all of it but I get your point. I would only agree to this if everything gets balanced between Leo's and Criminals. Currently the criminals don't have much advantages compered to Leo's and if something like this gets accepted then some of the suggestions that I will make against the Leo's taking unfair advantages should also be accepted. If they didn't get accepted it will be clear that the server wants LEO's to be powerful over criminals.

Mr.DollarMan wrote:

I didn't read all of it but I get your point. I would only agree to this if everything gets balanced between Leo's and Criminals. Currently the criminals don't have much advantages compered to Leo's and if something like this gets accepted then some of the suggestions that I will make against the Leo's taking unfair advantages should also be accepted. If they didn't get accepted it will be clear that the server wants LEO's to be powerful over criminals.

Like criminals aren't having some advantages?As a Law enforcer I can be /sh while puting the suspect into custody- /cuff and pretty disabling the LEO to arrest suspect.Unrealistic but okey.Break cuffs is not even realistic at all,but still I cuff suspect 3 times,3 times he brake it.I have no word of it.. A person braking the cuffs with his own power,no where to see except here,but I am not saying this should be removed,let it stay but stuffs like this abusable thing toward Army faction should not be tolerated.

I agree with Policeofficer he said everything. (( +1 ))

122policeofficer wrote:

Like criminals aren't having some advantages?As a Law enforcer I can be /sh while puting the suspect into custody- /cuff and pretty disabling the LEO to arrest suspect.Unrealistic but okey.Break cuffs is not even realistic at all,but still I cuff suspect 3 times,3 times he brake it.I have no word of it.. A person braking the cuffs with his own power,no where to see except here,but I am not saying this should be removed,let it stay but stuffs like this abusable thing toward Army faction should not be tolerated.

My friend I said that compared to Leo's we don't have enough advantages. I didn't say that criminals don't have advantages at all. You don't think breaking cuff is realistic but you don't see that arresting a person without taking him to the police station is also unrealistic. How can someone arrest someone just by typing a command?
It's a game and most of the things are meant to be unrealistic.