[Lsrcr]TuPac - Blatantly stealing suspect

[Ritz]

Your Name: [Lsrcr]Ritz
Reported Member: [Lsrcr]TuPac
Reason: Violating the rule #22 - Rule #22
You are not allowed at all to engage any suspect that was engaged from Army or any other LEO first (cops included), unless you have a valid permission from Army member/cop to do so.
Proof:
Other: I didn't want to actually take this into an official report but his attitude or may I say the way of him speaking to me has a bit anger in it, and more importantly ,he asked for the report so here am I.

[TuPac]

Well, well, well... thanks for reporting.
First of all, you are the one who engaged in my suspect area.

Let me tell you something you don't know, when a SWAT member is already engaging a suspect, you either help him or leave the suspect to him. I was the one who engaged that suspect while you were AFK. I can provide the record showing that.

The orange suspect, [JELZ], robbed [pacccc] I went after him and tried to arrest him. Then you came and simply waited for pacccc to kill him so you could take the second suspect. Logically, that's a red line. If the same thing happened in front of me, I wouldn't take the second suspect.

For example, imagine you find a wanted suspect dueling a civilian. You try to kill the wanted suspect, but the civilian kills him first, while I am standing there waiting to drag the civilian afterward. Would you accept that? No you wouldn't
That's exactly what happened here. You waited until the player killed the suspect I was chasing, then you went for him. That is logically a red line and should not be allowed.

Also, in the video, the moment I realized the orange suspect was about to die, I knew you would try to take him, which is why I rushed in, cuffed him, and dragged him.

I can't trust you, man. This also shows how hungry you are for suspects.
Honestly, it feels like you're holding a grudge against me for some reason.

What actually happened is simple... my suspect died because of another player, so I took the player who effectively stole my suspect.

You shouldn't have even been in my area in the first place.
proof: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJoPUUzqrh8

[TuPac]

also here I have a surprise for you, how I was helping you to take down you suspect, but you ignored me.. that shows how I treat you all army
and how you treats me back..
proof: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZGiWcu16aw

[TuPac]

Logically and simply, I took the suspect who took my suspect from me.
Now... you must explain WHAT WERE YOU DOING THERE?

It is clear that you were just waiting for the civilian to kill my suspect so you could steal the next one. If the original suspect had robbed or harmed you, then you would have a case, and you'd be free to report me.
But in this situation, you are clearly report-hunting me.

This was my area and my case you shouldn't have even touched the suspect without my permission.

In fact, I am the one who should report you for trying to steal my suspect without my permission, report-hunting, and defamation.

[Ritz]

You need to chill out lol, 3 replies in a row ,what gotchu so defensive ,you know you violated a rule and thought I was gonna let it go after you provoke me to report you ? Is it wrong for me to be there ? The rules clearly said not to engage SUSPECT that is engaged first by cops or Army, not the area, don't be so ridiculous .

With all respect, I'm just going to wait for the high command's final verdict as the video is clear enough and I don't have to say anything to make the situation even more clear.

[TuPac]

You need to chill out lol, 3 replies in a row ,what gotchu so defensive ,you know you violated a rule and thought I was gonna let it go after you provoke me to report you ? Is it wrong for me to be there ? The rules clearly said not to engage SUSPECT that is engaged first by cops or Army, not the area, don't be so ridiculous .

With all respect, I'm just going to wait for the high command's final verdict as the video is clear enough and I don't have to say anything to make the situation even more clear.

you don't know even the rules man.. you engaged in my suspect my area and waiting to steal him. logically man its mine....
there is a something named LOGIC

[Kawish]

In the evidence provided, both of you were near the suspect when he became wanted. Since Pershing Square is a highly populated area, it wouldn't be reasonable to assume the suspect belonged to either of you, especially when there wasn't any clear chase beforehand. On top of that, the suspect had killed Tupac's suspects, giving Tupac a valid reason to engage him.

Report dismissed.