
Moderator: S.W.A.T. Commanders
[Lsrcr]Gilles. wrote:yea -.-EventGroupAdmins wrote:forum banned on big? ^^isobeats wrote:Yes i know they arent that nice, But I like them*Pukes* xD
Ger wrote:Or they could also place a reason of why they recommend, not just ''RECOMMENDED.''Take a look at this reason why one Army member (I don't want to say names) dis-recommended FellaZ:

*Sunday* wrote:Ok, I have enough of this. Some Army members recommend/dis-recommend in SWAT applies too much. Some Army members reply on each application. I won't say names but if you take a look on the applies you'll will know who I mean.I agree with you, Sunday, but lets not forget the SWAT-part in this. Don't try to put the blame on the army only.
Let's get this clear:
Recommendations should re rare and given only to special people. You recommend only some1 who really deserved it. Recommending isn't voting. E.g. If some1 is your good friend, or is VERY skills you recommend him and if some1 DM-ed you a lot of times or insulted you a lot you dis-recommend him. I would like if everyone who is reading this goes and takes a look at the SWAT applications. Just look what is the reason for some recommendations and you'll understand what I mean.
turboo wrote:Not Recommended
turboo wrote:Why quote that?Mr.Fantastic wrote:Re-Read the rules mate and then apply.
isobeats wrote:not recommended
| - [b][color=#400040]S.A. Army [/color]B[color=#400040]rigadier [/color]G[color=#400040]eneral [/color][BG][/b], - [b][color=#400040]S.A. Army [/color]H[color=#400040]ead[/color] T[color=#400040]raining[/color] O[color=#400040]fficer[/color] [HTO][/b], - [b][color=#400040]S.A. [/color]A[color=#400040]rmy[/color] H[color=#400040]igh [/color]C[color=#400040]ommand Member[/color] [AHC][/b]. | - Former S.A. Army General (2013), - Former S.A. Army Head Event Officer (2015), - Former Server Administrator (2013).[/i] |


[Lsrcr]Gilles. wrote:I don't even know why we do it ... it's causing problems all the way. But hobo told me it's good for the swat-army friendship ...Out of 100, 99,9 of the recommendations are worth taking in mind. But, yeah, the ones which are nothing more than spam should be deleted.
I've warned some of them, but if them keep doing it, I can't do anymore.
My suggestion is, if the recommended/not recommended is not stated, just delete it, that's what I'll do.
| - [b][color=#400040]S.A. Army [/color]B[color=#400040]rigadier [/color]G[color=#400040]eneral [/color][BG][/b], - [b][color=#400040]S.A. Army [/color]H[color=#400040]ead[/color] T[color=#400040]raining[/color] O[color=#400040]fficer[/color] [HTO][/b], - [b][color=#400040]S.A. [/color]A[color=#400040]rmy[/color] H[color=#400040]igh [/color]C[color=#400040]ommand Member[/color] [AHC][/b]. | - Former S.A. Army General (2013), - Former S.A. Army Head Event Officer (2015), - Former Server Administrator (2013).[/i] |
killdahobo99 wrote:Honestly, I don't see a problem with people posting recommended or not recommended but at least provide a reason for why you did that.I know, so you agree with just deleting all the post that doesn't fit?
I've been general long enough to know that if you fully stop both factions from posting in each others section that causes more problems because we've tried it in the past.


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest