USA Vs. Syria

[dizzy50]

Most of the problems in Syria were because the US gov. was funding terrorism from Afghanistan and other parts of the world to enter Syria and bomb there. There were rarely pure normal citizens of Syria killing each other.

ofc this reminds me some historic events from the past.Also they do that so syria will make a war and syrians will be fighting each other and they will be stealing the valuable things like petrol etc.I believe that since I llearn from the history

shut the fuck up about your petrol, can you prove they actually took 'petrol' from syria? or planning to take it? no? then listen better at history classes and don't skip 'em

[CresP]

god bless america

[*Sunday*]

Most of the problems in Syria were because the US gov. was funding terrorism from Afghanistan and other parts of the world to enter Syria and bomb there. There were rarely pure normal citizens of Syria killing each other.

ofc this reminds me some historic events from the past.Also they do that so syria will make a war and syrians will be fighting each other and they will be stealing the valuable things like petrol etc.I believe that since I llearn from the history

shut the fuck up about your petrol, can you prove they actually took 'petrol' from syria? or planning to take it? no? then listen better at history classes and don't skip 'em

Once again, can you prove Assad was the one to use chemical weapons? No, you can't. Then using the same logic that means you should be against USA attacking Syria. We can't prove that USA is trying to steal oil = we shut up. You can't prove Assad used chem. weapons = you shut up. So stop saying "you can't prove anything" if you're going to argue in this topic because you can't as well.

[nikospap]

Hey hey hey relax I might said something wrong but keep it nice or I will act like you do dizzy.Dont make me to do that cause I dont want to.I cant say if I am correct but Sunday said it.

[dizzy50]

Once again, can you prove Assad was the one to use chemical weapons? No, you can't. Then using the same logic that means you should be against USA attacking Syria. We can't prove that USA is trying to steal oil = we shut up. You can't prove Assad used chem. weapons = you shut up. So stop saying "you can't prove anything" if you're going to argue in this topic because you can't as well.

Removed - please post links only - do not embed graphic videos - regards staff
i can bring pictures as well

[Fatal]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOYew1IA ... ture=share

Jackos signature and my own says it all. You can tell how we feel about this. Him from Australia and me from the United States.

[dizzy50]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOYew1IA-Ag&feature=share

Jackos signature and my own says it all. You can tell how we feel about this. Him from Australia and me from the United States.

why did you delete my videos? you cannot face the truth?
american teenagers who never saw in their eyes comment about things they have no connection to

[killdahobo99]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOYew1IA-Ag&feature=share

Jackos signature and my own says it all. You can tell how we feel about this. Him from Australia and me from the United States.

why did you delete my videos? you cannot face the truth?
american teenagers who never saw in their eyes comment about things they have no connection to

Because our countries offer more freedom we have no opinion?


Anyway, this whole issue is useless to discuss with individuals who have no knowledge of what the US did in previous countries they have entered.

[*Sunday*]

Once again, can you prove Assad was the one to use chemical weapons? No, you can't. Then using the same logic that means you should be against USA attacking Syria. We can't prove that USA is trying to steal oil = we shut up. You can't prove Assad used chem. weapons = you shut up. So stop saying "you can't prove anything" if you're going to argue in this topic because you can't as well.

Removed - please post links only - do not embed graphic videos - regards staff
i can bring pictures as well

I don't know what did you post but I'm sure no picture can prove that Assad used chemical weapons for sure. You can post pictures of victims but you can never be sure who used the weapons. Hell, even if you posted pictures of actual Syrian soldiers in Syrian uniforms it wouldn't be enough proof. The rebels could have easily disguised themselves, took proof and sent it to the US. As you see nothing is for sure and nobody can be trusted. If I had to choose who to trust between the US and Assad just based on words I'd rather trust Assad. As I said before the US proved to be utterly unreliable and nothing but liars and spies.

[dizzy50]

Once again, can you prove Assad was the one to use chemical weapons? No, you can't. Then using the same logic that means you should be against USA attacking Syria. We can't prove that USA is trying to steal oil = we shut up. You can't prove Assad used chem. weapons = you shut up. So stop saying "you can't prove anything" if you're going to argue in this topic because you can't as well.

Removed - please post links only - do not embed graphic videos - regards staff
i can bring pictures as well

I don't know what did you post but I'm sure no picture can prove that Assad used chemical weapons for sure. You can post pictures of victims but you can never be sure who used the weapons. Hell, even if you posted pictures of actual Syrian soldiers in Syrian uniforms it wouldn't be enough proof. The rebels could have easily disguised themselves, took proof and sent it to the US. As you see nothing is for sure and nobody can be trusted. If I had to choose who to trust between the US and Assad just based on words I'd rather trust Assad. As I said before the US proved to be utterly unreliable and nothing but liars and spies.

haha what do you want me to do? to show you footage of Assad going out of his royal castle to shell a village with chemical weapons?
come on sunday admit that assad did commit that chemical attack