
vatoslokos wrote:Dizzy, what I've seen from your posts lately is that you backup mainstream media information shit WAY too much and believe it just like a little child would believe his mom if he was told he could fly. Actually, I believe it was an inside job thinking about what Jacko said. I also think it was done that way because the US wanted to make a claim and accuse a kind of religion or a special group of people to get things their way and use it as an excuse. Perhaps trying to promote a bad image about a certain group of people or a certain religion..so you are believing USA killed 3,000 of their citizens to steal oil? from one side mocking me for believing some parts of the media but in the same time accepting the fact that USA hired airplanes trained terrorists, provided fake evidence, filled two huge towers with enough TNT to blow them down...cool story brothers
dizzy50 wrote:It's not only about the oil, there must have been something else aswell. As I mentioned, something like promoting a bad image of a group of people or a certain religion and then use it as an excuse to get people on their side and/or steal oil or whatever they are thinking of. But I've seen that you are believing media shit too much lately, perhaps because you hear what you want to hear, deny other theories and think whatever fits you the best if you can put it that way. Now, what's the media always telling? U.S is always the good country, the one that keeps terrorists away and the one that feels so guilty if they don't put themselves in and try to solve the problem other countries are suffering of. Now, give me some LOGICAL reasons why you would believe that shit? It's like, letting someone describe himself... Would someone say bad things about himself in something that would be published where multiple people would see it? Would someone say: "I'm a bad person, can't control my feelings and I use people to get things my way"? Or would it be more logical if someone else described that person from his own point of view. Try to criticize all media shit you hear before you believe it.vatoslokos wrote:Dizzy, what I've seen from your posts lately is that you backup mainstream media information shit WAY too much and believe it just like a little child would believe his mom if he was told he could fly. Actually, I believe it was an inside job thinking about what Jacko said. I also think it was done that way because the US wanted to make a claim and accuse a kind of religion or a special group of people to get things their way and use it as an excuse. Perhaps trying to promote a bad image about a certain group of people or a certain religion..so you are believing USA killed 3,000 of their citizens to steal oil? from one side mocking me for believing some parts of the media but in the same time accepting the fact that USA hired airplanes trained terrorists, provided fake evidence, filled two huge towers with enough TNT to blow them down...cool story brothers
vatoslokos wrote:if US is being criticized by everyone, why i cannot see you or other criticizing the arabs and the muslims? all i see US US US while people in Iraq getting killed by MUSLIMS, while all the muslim countries controlled by a dictatorship or even worst a terror organization, why no one talks about it? i suppose that because half of this culture and religion section is muslimdizzy50 wrote:It's not only about the oil, there must have been something else aswell. As I mentioned, something like promoting a bad image of a group of people or a certain religion and then use it as an excuse to get people on their side and/or steal oil or whatever they are thinking of. But I've seen that you are believing media shit too much lately, perhaps because you hear what you want to hear, deny other theories and think whatever fits you the best if you can put it that way. Now, what's the media always telling? U.S is always the good country, the one that keeps terrorists away and the one that feels so guilty if they don't put themselves in and try to solve the problem other countries are suffering of. Now, give me some LOGICAL reasons why you would believe that shit? It's like, letting someone describe himself... Would someone say bad things about himself in something that would be published where multiple people would see it? Would someone say: "I'm a bad person, can't control my feelings and I use people to get things my way"? Or would it be more logical if someone else described that person from his own point of view. Try to criticize all media shit you hear before you believe it.vatoslokos wrote:Dizzy, what I've seen from your posts lately is that you backup mainstream media information shit WAY too much and believe it just like a little child would believe his mom if he was told he could fly. Actually, I believe it was an inside job thinking about what Jacko said. I also think it was done that way because the US wanted to make a claim and accuse a kind of religion or a special group of people to get things their way and use it as an excuse. Perhaps trying to promote a bad image about a certain group of people or a certain religion..so you are believing USA killed 3,000 of their citizens to steal oil? from one side mocking me for believing some parts of the media but in the same time accepting the fact that USA hired airplanes trained terrorists, provided fake evidence, filled two huge towers with enough TNT to blow them down...cool story brothers
dizzy50 wrote: if US is being criticized by everyone, why i cannot see you or other criticizing the arabs and the muslims? all i see US US US while people in Iraq getting killed by MUSLIMS, while all the muslim countries controlled by a dictatorship or even worst a terror organization, why no one talks about it? i suppose that because half of this culture and religion section is muslimBECAUSE, U.S is where the power is, U.S is the most powerful country who affect everyone with their decisions. And who said no one criticize the arabs and muslims? I've seen a lot of it, here and on the media. It's always people promoting a bad image of muslims, or islam. Which is not actually true, a real believer and muslim wouldn't hurt a fly, I wouldn't even call those muslims. It's always people blaming muslims and "terrorists", anyone who attempts an attack on the US is a terrorist or a muslim right away without any in-depth evidence. Not criticizing arabs/muslims? Why are people then saying it was a terrorist attack by some muslim league? That's just what they want to hear, instead of going in-depth and trying to dig up the truth and see what benefit the people who blame them will get.
vatoslokos wrote:"a real believer and muslim wouldn't hurt a fly" hohohoho then our country is probably filled of fake pigs, 4 israeli people were killed since end of august by pigs, can you explain it?dizzy50 wrote: if US is being criticized by everyone, why i cannot see you or other criticizing the arabs and the muslims? all i see US US US while people in Iraq getting killed by MUSLIMS, while all the muslim countries controlled by a dictatorship or even worst a terror organization, why no one talks about it? i suppose that because half of this culture and religion section is muslimBECAUSE, U.S is where the power is, U.S is the most powerful country who affect everyone with their decisions. And who said no one criticize the arabs and muslims? I've seen a lot of it, here and on the media. It's always people promoting a bad image of muslims, or islam. Which is not actually true, a real believer and muslim wouldn't hurt a fly, I wouldn't even call those muslims. It's always people blaming muslims and "terrorists", anyone who attempts an attack on the US is a terrorist or a muslim right away without any in-depth evidence. Not criticizing arabs/muslims? Why are people then saying it was a terrorist attack by some muslim league? That's just what they want to hear, instead of going in-depth and trying to dig up the truth and see what benefit the people who blame them will get.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest