
*Sunday* wrote:You constantly glorify yourself, you're oblivious to your flaws and mistakes, you'd never accept to view yourself as anything less than perfect although you claim the opposite.But you told me..
Perfection isn't achieved in a physical existence. Thus it is not essential to a successful existence. Therefore you are assuming I consider myself something I believe to be impossible. You just feel like a loser that's all. Now it's time to feel it a bit more.
It doesn't matter how many "studies" you've done, you still know nothing. I have nothing more to say here, at this point I'd start repeating myself again.
*Sunday* wrote:You are indeed smart, I haven't had such a great discussion for a while now
Juice. wrote:Being smart, being intelligent and knowing a lot are 3 different things.*Sunday* wrote:You constantly glorify yourself, you're oblivious to your flaws and mistakes, you'd never accept to view yourself as anything less than perfect although you claim the opposite.But you told me..
Perfection isn't achieved in a physical existence. Thus it is not essential to a successful existence. Therefore you are assuming I consider myself something I believe to be impossible. You just feel like a loser that's all. Now it's time to feel it a bit more.
It doesn't matter how many "studies" you've done, you still know nothing. I have nothing more to say here, at this point I'd start repeating myself again.
*Sunday* wrote:You are indeed smart, I haven't had such a great discussion for a while now
Now that things can't possibly go your way you have resorted to lying to yourself. Sad

Juice. wrote:*Sunday* wrote: Being smart, being intelligent and knowing a lot are 3 different things.
lol oh ok. You had it right the first time.
*Sunday* wrote:I have nothing more to say here
smart (smärt)
adj.smart·er, smart·est
1.
a. Characterized by sharp quick thought; bright. See Synonyms at intelligent.
b. Amusingly clever; witty
intelligent
[in-tel-i-juhnt]
adjective
1.
having good understanding or a high mental capacity; quick to comprehend, as persons or animals: an intelligent student.
2.
displaying or characterized by quickness of understanding, sound thought, or good judgment: an intelligent reply.
know·ing
[noh-ing]
adjective
1.
affecting, implying, or deliberately revealing shrewd knowledge of secret or private information: a knowing glance.
2.
that knows; having knowledge or information; intelligent.
know
1 [noh]
verb (used with object), knew, known, know·ing.
1.
to perceive or understand as fact or truth; to apprehend clearly and with certainty: I know the situation fully.
Now I understand why I perceived you to be less than intelligent. Your uncertainty [doubt] exposes your intelligence levels.
It also exposes why I am able to speak with absolute undoubted certainty. Thanks. I can now say I learned something here. Before I didn't believe I was "very smart" as you say but now I do. With the definitions there could be no further proof. My closest friend who is very smart told me I was smarter than him. I thought he was being modest until he told me what I can't do lol
As if I'd waste time making up bs when it's real life things he doesn't know. After I provided him proof he admitted he was only playing the devil's advocate because he knew I could... Or I wouldn't have said so at all.
Have you ever heard the saying "there's no such thing as can't"? Well it speaks volumes when you find people who don't understand that yet. Emphasis on yet because it's mandatory to a successful existence.
It's easy to respect this brilliant technology called a dictionary.
intelligentWrong. The true definition of intelligence is "the ability to quickly adapt to new situations/conditions". This is the official and most commonly accepted definition in the psychological community. You tell me, psychology VS dictionary, who has the right definition?...
[in-tel-i-juhnt]
adjective
1.
having good understanding or a high mental capacity; quick to comprehend, as persons or animals: an intelligent student.
2.
displaying or characterized by quickness of understanding, sound thought, or good judgment: an intelligent reply.

*Sunday* wrote:Let me go ahead and make a great example of why you're too confident with your proof.I never defined intelligence. I defined intelligent. Sadly you didn't posses enough intelligence to notice.
intelligentWrong. The true definition of intelligence is "the ability to quickly adapt to new situations/conditions". This is the official and most commonly accepted definition in the psychological community. You tell me, psychology VS dictionary, who has the right definition?...
[in-tel-i-juhnt]
adjective
1.
having good understanding or a high mental capacity; quick to comprehend, as persons or animals: an intelligent student.
2.
displaying or characterized by quickness of understanding, sound thought, or good judgment: an intelligent reply.
I defined intelligent not intelligence. Nice TRY though. I have studied psychology for many years and its part of my arsenal that you can't do anything but be destroyed by. Unlike YOU I wouldn't have to put psychology against a dictionary because I posses the strength and knowledge of both. I have both of them working for me. Good luck putting them up against each other when you should be using them in concordance. Rookies.
You say its the official and most commonly accepted definition, post the link that states such ignorance. Prove it.
Words have different meanings depending on how its used, so don't worry i know you won't bring me proof because no one but you would type something so STUPID about a definition. Official and most commonly accepted definition??? LOLLLLL YEAH RIGHT SON!!! Your picture should be the OFFICIAL and MOST COMMONLY ACCEPTED definition for STUPIDITY.
Maybe that's why you're too confident with your proof, you accept any "proof" you can get without doubting it. Same thing with the dictionary (as I just gave an example), same thing with the Bible. You blindly accepted that this was the definition of intelligence without doubting it and you considered it a fact (because you only post facts, not opinions unless you state otherwise - your words).
*Sunday* wrote:I have nothing more to say here
*Sunday* wrote:Maybe that's why you're too confident with your proof, you accept any "proof" you can get without doubting it. Same thing with the dictionary (as I just gave an example), same thing with the Bible. You blindly accepted that this was the definition of intelligence without doubting it and you considered it a fact (because you only post facts, not opinions unless you state otherwise - your words).
Juice. wrote:*Sunday* wrote:Let me go ahead and make a great example of why you're too confident with your proof.I never defined intelligence. I defined intelligent. Sadly you didn't posses enough intelligence to notice.
intelligentWrong. The true definition of intelligence is "the ability to quickly adapt to new situations/conditions". This is the official and most commonly accepted definition in the psychological community. You tell me, psychology VS dictionary, who has the right definition?...
[in-tel-i-juhnt]
adjective
1.
having good understanding or a high mental capacity; quick to comprehend, as persons or animals: an intelligent student.
2.
displaying or characterized by quickness of understanding, sound thought, or good judgment: an intelligent reply.
I defined intelligent not intelligence. Nice TRY though. I have studied psychology for many years and its part of my arsenal that you can't do anything but be destroyed by. Unlike YOU I wouldn't have to put psychology against a dictionary because I posses the strength and knowledge of both. I have both of them working for me. Good luck putting them up against each other when you should be using them in concordance. Rookies.
You say its the official and most commonly accepted definition, post the link that states such ignorance. Prove it.
Words have different meanings depending on how its used, so don't worry i know you won't bring me proof because no one but you would type something so STUPID about a definition. Official and most commonly accepted definition??? LOLLLLL YEAH RIGHT SON!!! Your picture should be the OFFICIAL and MOST COMMONLY ACCEPTED definition for STUPIDITY.
Alright as you wish. Intelligent - "A quality or ability a person possesses which allows him/her to quickly adapt to new situations/conditions. Example: John is intelligent. (means: he can quickly adapt to new situations/conditions)" That's literally the same definition, the only difference between intelligent and intelligence is that one is a noun and the other an adjective.
And then you proceed to insult me (underlined part) because you're insecure about your own position in this discussion.
Maybe that's why you're too confident with your proof, you accept any "proof" you can get without doubting it. Same thing with the dictionary (as I just gave an example), same thing with the Bible. You blindly accepted that this was the definition of intelligence without doubting it and you considered it a fact (because you only post facts, not opinions unless you state otherwise - your words).
You even removed the other two words THAT ALSO PROVED YOU WRONG. So +2 to me. You have a 21 year olds mentality huh? A 21 year old who can't read maybe lol. You really need to consider reading next time. You defined a different word that you thought was the same. See that's why you could never be on my team, you rookie, I don't have room for such ignorant mistakes. You make your self out to be a bigger joke each time you post. Learn to read. Go play with your barbies and get out of here. lol
You had it right the first time.
And apparently you don't possess the intelligence to notice it's the same thing but one being a noun and the other an adjective.
*Sunday* wrote:I have nothing more to say here
If you respond without proof, this conversation is terminated. I want a link to the website or else its clear you are nothing but a low self esteemed, low confidence, doubting, lying, skeptical illiterate who may never succeed. I don't mind stupid people but what's the point of discussing anything with a STUPID LIAR? No point at all. So without proof you just did /kill... I guess we'll find out which you are soon.![]()
Another clear example of why your definition of proof is ridiculous. Anyone can make a website and post whatever they want there. Any info from the Internet cannot be trusted and is most of the time actually wrong, that's why I'm not likely to ever trust any proof found on the Internet.
My proof comes from a psychology schoolbook. I obviously can't post it here but hey, why don't you ask any psychologist or look it up in any psychology schoolbook? You'd be surprised. Real proof like this is harder to get but at least you won't have to find your "facts" in 5 minute Google searches.
Juice. wrote:*Sunday* wrote:Maybe that's why you're too confident with your proof, you accept any "proof" you can get without doubting it. Same thing with the dictionary (as I just gave an example), same thing with the Bible. You blindly accepted that this was the definition of intelligence without doubting it and you considered it a fact (because you only post facts, not opinions unless you state otherwise - your words).
You just claimed you went to a psychology forum for a definition, which is already stupid but.. You accepted it as proof without doubting it. (your words) You blindly accepted that this was the definition of intelligence without doubting it and you considered it a fact.
So you blame me for doing something as you make it blatantly obvious you are guilty of this RIGHT NOW? Stop smoking loll
One day you'll realize as you TRY YOUR BEST for a come back, I'm at least 5 posts ahead of the current one.
As you and me both agree I am intelligent which means I have good understanding and a high mental capacity. I can't take all the credit though, some of my best responses here were created because of your low mental capacity.
Quote when I claimed that I went to a psychology forum. I didn't, you're making things up.
Secondly, I never claimed you were intelligent, once again you're making things up. I claimed you were smart which isn't the same.
Well, if the whole psychological community agrees on that definition and if such definitions are approved in state schools I'd trust it... So Juice, what do you think, a community of experts VS the minds of few who created that dictionary?


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest