In-activity warnings

Have you got something in mind that you'd like to suggest for S.A. Army? Post your suggestions & improvements for S.A. Army here.

Moderator: S.A. Army Generals

41 posts Page 2 of 5

ShaYaN

User avatar
ShaYaN
Donator
Posts: 4992
Joined: October 7, 2012, 2:25 pm
Location: Sweden

Post by ShaYaN » August 1, 2015, 4:49 pm
I've got your point now, I agree with two warnings!
Image

Ryder

Ryder
Posts: 2647
Joined: March 16, 2011, 5:10 pm

Post by Ryder » August 2, 2015, 11:12 am
I'd also agree. Failing to respond - warning. Failing again - kick. Otherwise it's like we're giving them 100 chances to stay when they clearly seem uninterested.

+1 from me.
[Lsrcr]Ryder,
- [b][color=#400040]S.A. Army [/color]B[color=#400040]rigadier [/color]G[color=#400040]eneral [/color][BG][/b], - [b][color=#400040]S.A. Army [/color]H[color=#400040]ead[/color] T[color=#400040]raining[/color] O[color=#400040]fficer[/color] [HTO][/b], - [b][color=#400040]S.A. [/color]A[color=#400040]rmy[/color] H[color=#400040]igh [/color]C[color=#400040]ommand Member[/color] [AHC][/b].- Former S.A. Army General (2013), - Former S.A. Army Head Event Officer (2015), - Former Server Administrator (2013).[/i]

Moiz Nouman

moiz
Posts: 5844
Joined: October 7, 2012, 10:24 am
Location: Pakistan

Post by Moiz Nouman » August 2, 2015, 4:01 pm
Aahh, now I get you, so basically first you fail to respond on inactivity check = warning and Second time = kick.

+1
ImageImage
Image
Ex-Army Member, Ex-Swat Warrant Officer 1, Ex-Pagati Member
If you need any kind of help with modifications or related issues with the Game, PM me
Currently inactive in-game due to Study schedule, if you need me, you should PM me on forums.

Cyrex

User avatar
Cyrex
Donator
Posts: 3712
Joined: October 7, 2012, 11:35 am

Post by Cyrex » August 3, 2015, 5:55 am
Moiz Nouman wrote:
Aahh, now I get you, so basically first you fail to respond on inactivity check = warning and Second time = kick.

+1
Yeah unless they notify us about their inactivity.

Seems good, +1

122policeofficer

Policeofficer
Posts: 1254
Joined: January 10, 2014, 3:23 pm
Location: Bosnia and Herzegovina

Post by 122policeofficer » August 3, 2015, 9:20 pm
Just as John say kicking people will not lead nowhere.....We can not force someone to play,even if someone want to play maybe he can't due some problmes or what ever is......If I am asked about this I will make that someone who don't play half or one year to be kicked not like this ;)
But it's oke...
Sorry but I am not for this suggestion.

122policeofficer

Policeofficer
Posts: 1254
Joined: January 10, 2014, 3:23 pm
Location: Bosnia and Herzegovina

Post by 122policeofficer » August 3, 2015, 9:34 pm
I am reading all this comments,and I don't understand......we wanna to have some good Army officers but accepting them and after some time kicking don't sounds so good....
Why you people have so much hate or what ever is ? There is some people who lost interest to play and get back after few months and play constantly again,I don't see reasons to kick someone for that....I mean why we need to be so politicans and act like that...If someone become Army officer it should stay forever no matter is he active or not...I don't see the point...Is unactive player brake some rules f he not play,is he insulting someone....IDK but for me that's not good idea....Look fir example that Army have like 15 officers and 14 of them are inactive for some time,so they got be kicked and Army dissapear just like that....That's something what I want to say.....I think we should make our team biggest not force players to leave or kiciking them except they rule braking......If someone is army officer and don't want to be anymore he can leave team when he want but after that I will give players like that just one more chance to be in our team again not more....Not like this one mounth army second swat third army....
Don't someone understand me in wrong way......I want to say answering to inacivity check is not so bad and not so hard,also we have in-activity topic where we can report us if wanna be inactive.....that's all fine,but kicking someone because he is not active and you knowing what that player need to do to become that what is,I think that can bring some player lost for interest to ever again apply for our team!
Reagrds ;)

Nilikos

User avatar
[Lsrcr]NiLiKoS
Donator
Supporter
Posts: 2897
Joined: December 15, 2013, 6:20 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Nilikos » August 3, 2015, 10:50 pm
Moiz Nouman wrote:
Aahh, now I get you, so basically first you fail to respond on inactivity check = warning and Second time = kick.

+1
Spoiler: show

JohnCarer

Guest
Community Manager
Posts: 6380
Joined: February 26, 2013, 8:13 pm
Location: Europe

Post by JohnCarer » August 3, 2015, 10:55 pm
122policeofficer wrote:
I am reading all this comments,and I don't understand......we wanna to have some good Army officers but accepting them and after some time kicking don't sounds so good....
Why you people have so much hate or what ever is ? There is some people who lost interest to play and get back after few months and play constantly again,I don't see reasons to kick someone for that....I mean why we need to be so politicans and act like that...If someone become Army officer it should stay forever no matter is he active or not...I don't see the point...Is unactive player brake some rules f he not play,is he insulting someone....IDK but for me that's not good idea....Look fir example that Army have like 15 officers and 14 of them are inactive for some time,so they got be kicked and Army dissapear just like that....That's something what I want to say.....I think we should make our team biggest not force players to leave or kiciking them except they rule braking......If someone is army officer and don't want to be anymore he can leave team when he want but after that I will give players like that just one more chance to be in our team again not more....Not like this one mounth army second swat third army....
Don't someone understand me in wrong way......I want to say answering to inacivity check is not so bad and not so hard,also we have in-activity topic where we can report us if wanna be inactive.....that's all fine,but kicking someone because he is not active and you knowing what that player need to do to become that what is,I think that can bring some player lost for interest to ever again apply for our team!
Reagrds ;)
I'm happy to see someone clearly shares my point of view :)

Gio

User avatar
Gio
Donator
Posts: 178
Joined: November 28, 2013, 7:00 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Gio » August 3, 2015, 11:22 pm
Moiz Nouman wrote:
Aahh, now I get you, so basically first you fail to respond on inactivity check = warning and Second time = kick.

+1

+1

Nilikos

User avatar
[Lsrcr]NiLiKoS
Donator
Supporter
Posts: 2897
Joined: December 15, 2013, 6:20 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Nilikos » August 5, 2015, 5:20 pm
JohnCarer wrote:
122policeofficer wrote:
I am reading all this comments,and I don't understand......we wanna to have some good Army officers but accepting them and after some time kicking don't sounds so good....
Why you people have so much hate or what ever is ? There is some people who lost interest to play and get back after few months and play constantly again,I don't see reasons to kick someone for that....I mean why we need to be so politicans and act like that...If someone become Army officer it should stay forever no matter is he active or not...I don't see the point...Is unactive player brake some rules f he not play,is he insulting someone....IDK but for me that's not good idea....Look fir example that Army have like 15 officers and 14 of them are inactive for some time,so they got be kicked and Army dissapear just like that....That's something what I want to say.....I think we should make our team biggest not force players to leave or kiciking them except they rule braking......If someone is army officer and don't want to be anymore he can leave team when he want but after that I will give players like that just one more chance to be in our team again not more....Not like this one mounth army second swat third army....
Don't someone understand me in wrong way......I want to say answering to inacivity check is not so bad and not so hard,also we have in-activity topic where we can report us if wanna be inactive.....that's all fine,but kicking someone because he is not active and you knowing what that player need to do to become that what is,I think that can bring some player lost for interest to ever again apply for our team!
Reagrds ;)
I'm happy to see someone clearly shares my point of view :)
Than explain this to me,
Why are we having inactivity checks.
Spoiler: show
41 posts Page 2 of 5
Return to “S.A. Army [★] Suggestions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest