
Moderators: Suggestions helpers, Developers


[Lsrcr]WEED wrote:-1 the only with this it's for the wrong thingWhat? There is a rule already about hit evading .. you should read what the suggestion is.
this should for hit evading that's annoying
swats are annoying with all the tazing because one all ready tazed u the does still taze you fair actually fair this way so people be able to /q & /bc to even the odds so i say no
Nilikos Online
Aleksa wrote:I'll try to find an old thread about it.[Lsrcr]Nilikos wrote:Was suggested many times back in the days.Source please.
Never got accepted.
Don't see why it should be accepted now.
We are only looking for a rule, if anything occued related Army to this, I'm sure it would be accepted.
We had sparrow, *removed* too OP?!
Army gets sparrow....WP
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest