
Unc3N 8D wrote:It is getting patched soon.BeaTen. wrote:nVidia's 1 fps = amd's 2 fpsLol this is certainly not true.
Argue much, but this is true
OT: good game, bad anticheat

Zoroark wrote:I've given people in game moneyHis life is fulfilled now
Unc3N 8D wrote:Well you gotta see gtx 750/960Ti's gaming review, it plays GTA v @high-ultra at 40-50 fps and it looks like it's 100+. It's all on the optimisation in which AMD is just SHIT. AMD might win if it comes to budget but nVidia is the bestBeaTen. wrote:nVidia's 1 fps = amd's 2 fpsLol this is certainly not true.
Argue much, but this is true
OT: good game, bad anticheat
Aleksa wrote:i dont, i am going to upgrade my computer this summer then i'll play. i watch r6s videos daily to get informed (call me a weirdo, but sometimes its more fun than being in samp for obvious reasons)Kaosx234 wrote:How do you play it then?Aleksa wrote:Kaos, do you have the original game on PC?no, but even if i had, i cannot even pass the loading of the lag (fps issue)

Zoroark wrote:I've given people in game moneyHis life is fulfilled now
BeaTen. wrote:40-50 fps looks like 100+ fps? Source please.Unc3N 8D wrote:Well you gotta see gtx 750/960Ti's gaming review, it plays GTA v @high-ultra at 40-50 fps and it looks like it's 100+. It's all on the optimisation in which AMD is just SHIT. AMD might win if it comes to budget but nVidia is the bestBeaTen. wrote:nVidia's 1 fps = amd's 2 fpsLol this is certainly not true.
Argue much, but this is true
OT: good game, bad anticheat





Aleksa wrote:I'm pretty sure aleksa made it clear enoughUnc3N 8D wrote:40-50 fps looks like 100+ fps? Source please.Source
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest