Stricer punishments for violating report section rules

[122policeofficer]

Your name: [Lsrcr]Policeofficer
Suggestion headline: Add stricter punishments for those who replying in report but they are not involve and same for unban applications
Picture:
Why should we accept this: I see much people enjoy to ruin a someone report but however they are not involve in report in any kind of way,nor they have any valid proof to add.Only thing I see is "I am sorry for posting here" and then some useless text.Those players get 24 hours forum ban but as I can see none of them are care about it,because if they would care they wouldn't post useless comments.So I suggesting to add stricter punishments for such a users like for ex 3 to 5 days forum ban for violating report/unban section rules once and 10 and more days forum ban for those who has been forum banned already before for violating report/unban section rules but they did it again.

[e.e]

Your name: [Lsrcr]Policeofficer
Suggestion headline: Add stricter punishments for those who replying in report but they are not involve and same for unban applications
Picture:
Why should we accept this: I see much people enjoy to ruin a someone report but however they are not involve in report in any kind of way,nor they have any valid proof to add.Only thing I see is "I am sorry for posting here" and then some useless text.Those players get 24 hours forum ban but as I can see none of them are care about it,because if they would care they wouldn't post useless comments.So I suggesting to add stricter punishments for such a users like for ex 3 to 5 days forum ban for violating report/unban section rules once and 10 and more days forum ban for those who has been forum banned already before for violating report/unban section rules but they did it again.

Well, people who are involved like a witness should be allowed to post there. Like someone is cheating / rulebreaking, why don't post more evidence against the reported player instead of making a new topic?

[David]

I think that he is talking about this topic viewtopic.php?f=11&t=71801 e.e
Anyway +1

[Astrl]

Literally no point, If people are going to post in a report, they're going to post there.

I'd suggest having to approve comments inside of a post by Administrators or something like that.
For example, people whos names have been mentioned inside of the topic may post / comment also.

I am not sure how this would work but I'd like to see something like this be incorporated.

[e.e]

Why don't add shit like you have to wait that an admin activates your comment?

[Robin]

We'll do our job, you do yours.

[Zoroark]

I'm neutral

+1 because people sometimes say stupid shit and then do it again.

-1 what if they actually have something to say? What's the point in sending a PM when you can just give a reply right there? As long as it's not a full blown conversation I don't see how a few posts make the job harder, but I'm not an admin so I am not going to assume its doesn't.

But it would kinda suck when someone gets banned but you could have prevent it on the first place by simply replying as an eyewitness with proofs.

[122policeofficer]

Some people didn't understand what i want to say and I also recognize some even don't know report section rules...skillz if you are mentioned in report you have right to comment in that report.Also you can comment report if you are not involved but however you have a valid proof for the person who is reported,on this way we reduce a report posts,I mean it's easier to add proof against person who is reported already than making new post.
And yes I didn't mean to punish person hardly if that person doing that for first time,everyone do mistakes sometimes...I mean if the person keep commenting the report against someone but don't have any proof for that words then it should be punished more than 1 day

[Nilikos]

Literally no point, If people are going to post in a report, they're going to post there.

I'd suggest having to approve comments inside of a post by Administrators or something like that.
For example, people whos names have been mentioned inside of the topic may post / comment also.

I am not sure how this would work but I'd like to see something like this be incorporated.

Post restriction would be the best solution indeed, for the report and unban section.

[Thursday]

Well onzie already make it strict.

Quoting from onzie post,


Breaking the Section Rules


Breaking the Report Section Rules will result in forum-bans and warns. The first time you do it you will be banned for 24 hours from the Board, a second rulebreak will result in a 3 days ban. If you still don't have enough and you break the rules a third time you will be banned for 1 week. Any further rulebreak results in always one more week. Here is an example:

[Lsrcr]Onzie - Posting in Report ( first time ) - Banned for 24 hours
[Lsrcr]Onzie - Posting in Report ( second time ) - Banned for 3 days
[Lsrcr]Onzie - Posting in Report ( third time ) - Banned for 1 Week
[Lsrcr]Onzie - Posting in Report ( forth time ) - Banned for 2 Weeks (and so on)