
GalaxyGeri wrote:After the space mission, apollo 11 (to the moon), the astronauts were kept 3 weeks locked in a special hospital on Texas to get checked for any kind of viruses which could possibly destroy life on Earth. there is no bacteria found on Earth which could resist without oxygen, without an atmosphere, in such a low temperature as the moon. Even though the chances are quite unlucky for any virus or bacteria to be on moon (because there is no atmosphere), the scientists took it as a threat.The Apollo 11 mission was the first manned mission to the Moon surface, without any previous knowledge of the environment when it comes to bacteria and viruses. They just wanted to make sure that there was not anything that developed there that was unknown to us, you know, evolution.
GalaxyGeri wrote:Anyways, there is at least a Satelite on every planet on our solar system giving info and pictures.Wrong, we have send one on a fly-by or just flew past them over a long distance without entering the SoI. The Voyager program is a good example. Assuming you do not mean natural satellites.
GalaxyGeri wrote:One of the planets with the most satelites (on orbit and on ground, except Earth) is Mars. A very huge talk was made about people going to Mars.A satellite is never on the ground, unless it is no longer operational or yet to be launched. Rovers are a different thing.
GalaxyGeri wrote:With the robot technology, there is no need for people, because the pictures are very high on quality, so are the videos.A Mars Rover is well documented and it is quite a thing when it gets launched, you simply do not "lose" a rover without a trace.
Another reason is because Mars is too far away, like 9 months of distance.
A reason could be because there is atmosphere on Mars and there could be a chance of dangerous viruses to live there, which could destroy life on earth if it was brought back on it.
But, what if one of the reasons could be, because Mars its not our planet? I mean, I know they sent expensive robots and stuff, but what if one of them was destroyed, never made public and was a huge threat for NASA?
GalaxyGeri wrote:We may want Aliens on Earth, but we are wrong. Even though they are friendly, humans are not. We build walls, discriminate others, talk shit, offend, kill, we are power hungry, we use hierarchy. It is possible from a close orbit to see the Berlin wall, the wall between India and Pakistan. There are clear evidence that the Earth its not a friendly place, which could make Aliens not cooperate with this place.Nothing much to say, it is not all true and accurate but you are putting it in a nice perspective for sure.
It might sound crazy, why would we hate Aliens? But, it's simple, we can't even accept each other in the society, why could we accept completely other creatures?
By the history, we have showed that we are NOT peaceful at all, so, this might be one of the reasons why we are not contacting with the Aliens.
For my opinion, if there is an attempt from other creatures to contact with Earth, we should never answer it.
We are not ready for other kinds of creatures in this planet.


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest