[Rejected] ARMY Suggestion

Have you got something in mind that you'd like to suggest for S.A. Army? Post your suggestions & improvements for S.A. Army here.

Moderator: S.A. Army Generals

46 posts Page 5 of 5
Do you want this suggestion to be implemented?

68%
Yes
27
33%
No
13

Total votes: 40

Overdose

User avatar
Overdose
Posts: 380
Joined: December 21, 2016, 9:42 am
Location: Crack Den

Post by Overdose » October 4, 2018, 11:48 am
ELboz wrote:
I honestly agree with Overdose in everything he said.
It is fair to remove Shocks against army soldiers and to remove /Taze Command against the Suspects.
Suspects might fight if they want,Using drugs or without it. Otherwise,They can run away Or Climb to a building roof to use Sniper Rifle..
There are many ways for The non-dueler players.
So I agree with Overdose in everything.
many ways to escape
xDeadlyKiller wrote:
BeaTen. wrote:
You know by making any one immune to shock, you're just forcing the robber to duel you. Army is meant to duel wanteds, but are robbers also meant to duel army? Clearly no. Making it shock proof will be extremely unfair. But, making it shock proof only for a limited amount of time (just like swat bomb) will be reasonable. Also if players rage when you arrest them its very simple to ignore them. If you duel someone and he shocks in between duel then he needs to be arrested since dueling him is no use. Just to end 'fights', it doesn't mean that you will remove the taze, cuff and shock commands for army.
I agree with Beaten's point
forcing players to duel is better than forcing them to get jailed and get bored of the game
you all prefer dying over getting jailed
be honest with yourselfs
also this will definitely reduce abusing /q command

Playa

User avatar
Playa
Posts: 1754
Joined: April 28, 2016, 10:34 am
Location: Canada

Post by Playa » October 9, 2018, 4:49 am
Overdose wrote:
ELboz wrote:
I honestly agree with Overdose in everything he said.
It is fair to remove Shocks against army soldiers and to remove /Taze Command against the Suspects.
Suspects might fight if they want,Using drugs or without it. Otherwise,They can run away Or Climb to a building roof to use Sniper Rifle..
There are many ways for The non-dueler players.
So I agree with Overdose in everything.
many ways to escape
xDeadlyKiller wrote:
BeaTen. wrote:
You know by making any one immune to shock, you're just forcing the robber to duel you. Army is meant to duel wanteds, but are robbers also meant to duel army? Clearly no. Making it shock proof will be extremely unfair. But, making it shock proof only for a limited amount of time (just like swat bomb) will be reasonable. Also if players rage when you arrest them its very simple to ignore them. If you duel someone and he shocks in between duel then he needs to be arrested since dueling him is no use. Just to end 'fights', it doesn't mean that you will remove the taze, cuff and shock commands for army.
I agree with Beaten's point
forcing players to duel is better than forcing them to get jailed and get bored of the game
you all prefer dying over getting jailed
be honest with yourselfs
also this will definitely reduce abusing /q command
Not everyone can duel or would wanna duel, you can't force them to do so.

Add me on steam!
Image

Overdose

User avatar
Overdose
Posts: 380
Joined: December 21, 2016, 9:42 am
Location: Crack Den

Post by Overdose » October 12, 2018, 2:32 pm
Playa wrote:
Overdose wrote:
ELboz wrote:
I honestly agree with Overdose in everything he said.
It is fair to remove Shocks against army soldiers and to remove /Taze Command against the Suspects.
Suspects might fight if they want,Using drugs or without it. Otherwise,They can run away Or Climb to a building roof to use Sniper Rifle..
There are many ways for The non-dueler players.
So I agree with Overdose in everything.
many ways to escape
xDeadlyKiller wrote:
I agree with Beaten's point
forcing players to duel is better than forcing them to get jailed and get bored of the game
you all prefer dying over getting jailed
be honest with yourselfs
also this will definitely reduce abusing /q command
Not everyone can duel or would wanna duel, you can't force them to do so.
Not everyone can get jailcards or would wanna get arrested , you can't force them to do so,
Easy if want arrest play as cop , if you want to kill play as Army
i won't reply any further.

iActroes

User avatar
iActroes
Donator
Posts: 556
Joined: September 30, 2017, 8:52 pm
Location: Egypt

Post by iActroes » October 12, 2018, 3:18 pm
A big yes for this suggestion
Spoiler: show

Image

Playa

User avatar
Playa
Posts: 1754
Joined: April 28, 2016, 10:34 am
Location: Canada

Post by Playa » October 12, 2018, 4:39 pm
Overdose wrote:
Playa wrote:
Overdose wrote:
many ways to escape

forcing players to duel is better than forcing them to get jailed and get bored of the game
you all prefer dying over getting jailed
be honest with yourselfs
also this will definitely reduce abusing /q command
Not everyone can duel or would wanna duel, you can't force them to do so.
Not everyone can get jailcards or would wanna get arrested , you can't force them to do so,
Easy if want arrest play as cop , if you want to kill play as Army
i won't reply any further.
Your first line did not make any sense. Anyhow, I can see how that makes more sense for army, but it doesn't make any sense from the criminals point of view. You cannot force them to duel you, this is a cops and robbers server and not a deathmatch/duel server.

Add me on steam!
Image

Robin

User avatar
Robin
Donator
Posts: 12368
Joined: October 27, 2014, 11:08 am

Post by Robin » October 12, 2018, 7:32 pm
As Playa mentioned, Lsrcr is a CnR server. By forcing Army to be kill-only, we are killing the CnR concept.
Of course, the priority should be killing, but I highly doubt that removing the arresting abilities of Army will help us even a tiny bit.

A guy with 400 ping tries to duel you, you can't hit him since he's extremely laggy, it's better to just arrest him.
You are heavily outnumbered, you can arrest one/two and (try to...) kill the rest.
You are teaming with Swat, they got their car full or blown up, you arrest (or assist by /taze and /cuff)

If you catch anyone constantly arresting, feel free to contact me personally on Discord (with proofs), and I'll deal with it.

All in all, although not encouraged, Army does need the ability to arrest.


Cheers,
Robin
Major General.
Retired community player 2013-2020
★ Retired LSPD United Chief of Police ★
★ Retired S.A. Army General ★

Spoiler: show
Spoiler: show
46 posts Page 5 of 5
Return to “S.A. Army [★] Suggestions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest