TOs right of posting.

[iFace]

Name: [Lsrcr]IFACE
Suggestion(s): TOs are allowed to post on reports.
Why would it be useful: Why? Because we are mature army members who can deal with those situations.
Additional comments: And if not TOs, at least Army high commands.

[noʎʞɔnɟ]

+1.

((Your signature hurts my eyes and my brain, especially the android/iphone comment.))

[APEX]

-1

First of all who says TOs are mature ? They are not, Because I have seen too many of them has broken the rules like [Lsrcr]Game who has two warnings. I think just generals can deal with reports!

and about army high commands :
I think high commanders just need to help generals, Not to deal instead of generals.

[TripleH]

I agree with APEX
NOT SUPPORTING

[ShaYaN]

-1

First of all who says TOs are mature ? They are not, Because I have seen too many of them has broken the rules like [Lsrcr]Game who has two warnings. I think just generals can deal with reports!

and about army high commands :
I think high commanders just need to help generals, Not to deal instead of generals.

[Game]

-1

First of all who says TOs are mature ? They are not, Because I have seen too many of them has broken the rules like [Lsrcr]Game who has two warnings. I think just generals can deal with reports!

and about army high commands :
I think high commanders just need to help generals, Not to deal instead of generals.

What the fuck does maturity with having warnings to do?
Go google the word ''mature'' before you talk, you have no idea why i have those warnings so dont talk.

Also Im on the same opinion, generals should deal with the reports as they are the only leaders in charge of the members.

[GrumpyCat]

-1. Generals are there for a reason and it should be only their duty to handle things like that.

[JohnCarer]

As a TO and army Staff member, you can add any comment that is relevant to more complicated reports, which helps the Generals to make the right decision. That doesn't include posting random, smartass remarks or anything that's irrelevant