Suggestion: (Add some simple rules for SWAT bomb)

If you have a new idea that could benefit the team, feel free to share it here!

Moderator: S.W.A.T. Commanders

16 posts Page 2 of 2

Veen

User avatar
[Lsrcr]Veen
Senior Administrator
Posts: 2329
Joined: June 29, 2019, 9:31 pm

Post by Veen » January 31, 2021, 4:31 pm
ackman wrote:
First of all no point in making suggestions related to SW bomb
This is the only thing i find reasonable here.
dev3r3r wrote:
I'm not going to talk or give my opinion, but im going to drop this here ..
just check it out, https://imgur.com/a/8xSufNu
Cool idea, let me drop some bomb suggestions that carry too much opinions and that is by the way what makes this suggestion here pointless, since these things had already been discussed in the past ( including bounding bomb to rules) and I do not find repeating things interesting.

https://www.ls-rcr.com/forum/viewtopic. ... 5#p1027357

https://www.ls-rcr.com/forum/viewtopic. ... 0376bd6[hr][/hr]

Now moving forward to answer diplo's main suggestions,
  • Your precised in your first suggestion that orange suspects shouldn't be Bombed unless they get /su'ed. So I suppose a cophunting team with both reds and orange suspects would require to be /su'ed aswell? Lol sorry i do not agree with this since that kind of cophunt is already powerful with all the mechanics that they mostly use. Also it's not really easy to get close to them since all of them are shooting and on constant move. this is without talking about the /jsb that could be used after the /su and which again would make it just impossible to stop a cophunt that is actually unstopable without the swat bomb. I hope you aren't guys planning to be able to keep cophunting for eternity lol...

    Another point is that the orange boys that we su'ed, I'm talking about 2 suspects since your also suggested not using the bomb on single suspect. they could simply head near another orange suspects and we wouldn't be able to use that bomb since they're close too a suspect that we didn't /su and who would probably claim that he wasn't teaming which lead to reports.
  • Your second suggestion is about not being able to use the comb at all against a single suspect. This does also mean not being able to use the swat bomb against a mountain bike or a vortex one , and i believe not only me but many people do see that they do deserve to be bombed considering how they vehicles gives way more advantage.

    Another point i'd like to mention about this suggestion. we are already bounded to many rules while playing in swat skin, it's not only how we'd catch a suspect that matters but escorting him from that place to deliver is also a big deal. Facing rammers, mechanics that /break , or leos themselves that carjack us, there're much things we have in our mind while playing as swat so i believe it's not a great idea to add more complexe things and make it even a more stressing job . A simple example would be a bunch of criminals cophunting at LSA, they're all shooting at leos, picking cuffs for others, shocking leos which give the intention of all of them teaming, but once we use the bomb, I believe at least 30% of the affected suspects would complain about how they were far from others and that they were playing on their own whereas we do know that it's not the case. so this is just giving more space to useless reports and making report section active.
  • Your last suggestion is great , but it should be implemented as a feature not as a rule, because we don't really make calls for the bomb and there're specific situations in a short time span where we have to use the bomb , many members could have the reflex in the same time and use their bomb with no intentions to break a rule. So yeah addind a feature that makes players impossible to get affected by the bomb for a certain time after a first one had been casted on them, sounds good.

Image

BeaTen.

BeatEn
Posts: 2679
Joined: May 30, 2014, 3:01 am
Location: India.

Post by BeaTen. » January 31, 2021, 4:50 pm
We will never add a rule that will restrict the bomb usage to only 1 suspect. It is impossible to figure out of it is a 1v1 or a 2v1. What we can add is to make it compulsory to /su the suspect if he is an orange and has not shot you first.
Spoiler: show
"Standard of this team", you are always causing trouble in this SWAT section? Is it some personal issue of yours that you cannot withstand this faction?
Speaking of standards, yours are clearly quite low, speaking of server rulebreaks.. let us not.
It's better you refrain from using the terms like "Standards of this team" and "crying", spreading faction hate is a rulebreak too. So, please, maintain your standards, don't post something if you don't have anything smart to mention. You know nothing about the 'standards', maybe try to get your standards high first then have expectations from others.
Any other hateful comment from your side anywhere in the SWAT section will be deleted.

Faraon78910

User avatar
Faraon
Retired Administrator
Event Host
Posts: 7730
Joined: August 16, 2013, 10:12 pm
Location: Glen Park

Post by Faraon78910 » January 31, 2021, 5:29 pm
BeaTen. wrote:
We will never add a rule that will restrict the bomb usage to only 1 suspect. It is impossible to figure out of it is a 1v1 or a 2v1. What we can add is to make it compulsory to /su the suspect if he is an orange and has not shot you first.
About 1v1 feature.. It's not supposed to be a rule but should be programmed to test if there is more than 1 wanted suspect (lvl 4+) within ssb range, if there is just 1 wanted suspect then such message should appear 'there is not enough wanteds to bomb'
or/and add limit how many ssbs you can refill per life, 2/3 maybe

BeaTen.

BeatEn
Posts: 2679
Joined: May 30, 2014, 3:01 am
Location: India.

Post by BeaTen. » January 31, 2021, 5:35 pm
Faraon78910 wrote:
BeaTen. wrote:
We will never add a rule that will restrict the bomb usage to only 1 suspect. It is impossible to figure out of it is a 1v1 or a 2v1. What we can add is to make it compulsory to /su the suspect if he is an orange and has not shot you first.
About 1v1 feature.. It's not supposed to be a rule but should be programmed to test if there is more than 1 wanted suspect (lvl 4+) within ssb range, if there is just 1 wanted suspect then such message should appear 'there is not enough wanteds to bomb'
or/and add limit how many ssbs you can refill per life, 2/3 maybe
People can snipe from a long distance, that wouldn't make it a "1v1", but still it wouldn't let you use the bomb. This can be abused in many ways, I don't think this is a feature that must be added.

ackman

User avatar
[Lsrcr]Ackman
Game Administrator
Duel Master Event Host Blackmarket VIP
Posts: 5003
Joined: December 20, 2016, 7:25 am
Location: 696, Willowfield.

Post by ackman » January 31, 2021, 7:34 pm
Spoiler: show
You shouldn’t be really worried about my standards as I don’t even play anymore. SWAT is an official faction, not something individual, so its standards should matter to this community.
Image

Image
Image
About me:

Hello, I am Ackman and I am from Pakistan. I'm a part time Epic Gamer. Coming to the Criminal Career I'd like to mention that I am the founder of Blackouts group. It was founded on 19th of April, in 2017. Other than that, I am the leader of DreamTeam group. Coming to the LEO Career, I am currently serving the Army faction as a Major [MAJ].
Current memberships:
  • Blackouts
  • DreamTeam
  • Akatsuki
  • NCS
  • Saints
  • VLA
  • Durcrew
  • Beta Tester
  • [Lsrcr] tag.
Activity Status:
  • In-game: 6/10
  • TeamSpeak: 1/10
  • Discord: 9/10 (ackman #7476)
  • Forums: 5/10
OldSchool:
Spoiler: show

Luka

User avatar
[Lsrcr]Luka
Game Administrator
Posts: 2826
Joined: January 30, 2017, 8:12 pm
Location: Georgia

Post by Luka » March 31, 2021, 9:24 am
Not of interested at this time, we believe criminals are powerful enough there days, at least this is what it looks like, you guys don't have to win every situation. As for bomb being OP etc, we have had this discussion before, enough changes have been done to balance things and if majority of you don't feel that way, feel free to make another suggestion and get votes in, withoutany arguments.

Sorry for the delayed response, I know, I know, I'm inactive
16 posts Page 2 of 2
Return to “S.W.A.T. || Suggestions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest