
Moderator: S.W.A.T. Commanders
ackman wrote:First of all no point in making suggestions related to SW bombThis is the only thing i find reasonable here.
dev3r3r wrote:I'm not going to talk or give my opinion, but im going to drop this here ..Cool idea, let me drop some bomb suggestions that carry too much opinions and that is by the way what makes this suggestion here pointless, since these things had already been discussed in the past ( including bounding bomb to rules) and I do not find repeating things interesting.
just check it out, https://imgur.com/a/8xSufNu

BeaTen. wrote:We will never add a rule that will restrict the bomb usage to only 1 suspect. It is impossible to figure out of it is a 1v1 or a 2v1. What we can add is to make it compulsory to /su the suspect if he is an orange and has not shot you first.About 1v1 feature.. It's not supposed to be a rule but should be programmed to test if there is more than 1 wanted suspect (lvl 4+) within ssb range, if there is just 1 wanted suspect then such message should appear 'there is not enough wanteds to bomb'
Faraon78910 wrote:People can snipe from a long distance, that wouldn't make it a "1v1", but still it wouldn't let you use the bomb. This can be abused in many ways, I don't think this is a feature that must be added.BeaTen. wrote:We will never add a rule that will restrict the bomb usage to only 1 suspect. It is impossible to figure out of it is a 1v1 or a 2v1. What we can add is to make it compulsory to /su the suspect if he is an orange and has not shot you first.About 1v1 feature.. It's not supposed to be a rule but should be programmed to test if there is more than 1 wanted suspect (lvl 4+) within ssb range, if there is just 1 wanted suspect then such message should appear 'there is not enough wanteds to bomb'
or/and add limit how many ssbs you can refill per life, 2/3 maybe



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests