USA Vs. Syria

This section is +18 and not for people who are easily offended. Respect other people's beliefs.
Forum rules
This section is not for people who are easily offended (hence 18+).
Respect other people's beliefs.
Material in this section may not be suitable for all audiences.
140 posts Page 8 of 14

Zeraniti

User avatar
Zeraniti
Posts: 361
Joined: October 13, 2012, 4:45 pm
Location: Sweden

Post by Zeraniti » September 5, 2013, 6:10 pm
Saw Obama yesterday in Stockholm, Sweden.

Really soft guy to speak with.
Retired Army Member | La Famiglia Assassini Pagati

dizzy50

Dizzy
Posts: 435
Joined: December 13, 2012, 3:09 pm

Post by dizzy50 » September 5, 2013, 6:58 pm
Ryder wrote:
Dizzy do you really believe USA (referring to Obama) is some saint who wants to help Syria? I got this expression by reading few of your posts.
no, i never said that but is it better to let the war continue and do nothing about it when children are being killed by muslims?

Ryder

Ryder
Posts: 2647
Joined: March 16, 2011, 5:10 pm

Post by Ryder » September 5, 2013, 7:10 pm
dizzy50 wrote:
Ryder wrote:
Dizzy do you really believe USA (referring to Obama) is some saint who wants to help Syria? I got this expression by reading few of your posts.
no, i never said that but is it better to let the war continue and do nothing about it when children are being killed by muslims?
No, of course not. But if they use violence they will receive violence - considering Russia backs up Syria you can't expect this to end any time soon. Not without millions innocent dead people. It's obvious Assad won't step down on his own, but starting a war is the most sick thing you can do.

Sick.
[Lsrcr]Ryder,
- [b][color=#400040]S.A. Army [/color]B[color=#400040]rigadier [/color]G[color=#400040]eneral [/color][BG][/b], - [b][color=#400040]S.A. Army [/color]H[color=#400040]ead[/color] T[color=#400040]raining[/color] O[color=#400040]fficer[/color] [HTO][/b], - [b][color=#400040]S.A. [/color]A[color=#400040]rmy[/color] H[color=#400040]igh [/color]C[color=#400040]ommand Member[/color] [AHC][/b].- Former S.A. Army General (2013), - Former S.A. Army Head Event Officer (2015), - Former Server Administrator (2013).[/i]

dizzy50

Dizzy
Posts: 435
Joined: December 13, 2012, 3:09 pm

Post by dizzy50 » September 5, 2013, 7:20 pm
Ryder wrote:
dizzy50 wrote:
Ryder wrote:
Dizzy do you really believe USA (referring to Obama) is some saint who wants to help Syria? I got this expression by reading few of your posts.
no, i never said that but is it better to let the war continue and do nothing about it when children are being killed by muslims?
No, of course not. But if they use violence they will receive violence - considering Russia backs up Syria you can't expect this to end any time soon. Not without millions innocent dead people. It's obvious Assad won't step down on his own, but starting a war is the most sick thing you can do.

Sick.
assad has no balls to do it, in fact USA planned to attack empty ammo factories and military compounds at night (!) which means their
attack wasnt supposed to be against soldiers or living people..tho' i agree with you

Ryder

Ryder
Posts: 2647
Joined: March 16, 2011, 5:10 pm

Post by Ryder » September 5, 2013, 7:27 pm
You believe that? USA dropped two nuclear bombs on Japan in 1945 killing about 100,000+ people for testing purposes.
The first bomb was a uranium-type and the second bomb was a plutonium-type. Truman (US president) wanted to test both types of bombs on real cities to compare and contrast the effects of uranium v plutonium for scientific purposes.
What will stop them from doing it now? They did it before, they will do it again.

Sick.
[Lsrcr]Ryder,
- [b][color=#400040]S.A. Army [/color]B[color=#400040]rigadier [/color]G[color=#400040]eneral [/color][BG][/b], - [b][color=#400040]S.A. Army [/color]H[color=#400040]ead[/color] T[color=#400040]raining[/color] O[color=#400040]fficer[/color] [HTO][/b], - [b][color=#400040]S.A. [/color]A[color=#400040]rmy[/color] H[color=#400040]igh [/color]C[color=#400040]ommand Member[/color] [AHC][/b].- Former S.A. Army General (2013), - Former S.A. Army Head Event Officer (2015), - Former Server Administrator (2013).[/i]

killdahobo99

Killdahobo
Retired Administrator
Posts: 4791
Joined: December 16, 2010, 10:23 pm
Location: GREATEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD.

Post by killdahobo99 » September 5, 2013, 8:57 pm
You all gotta realize that you can't stop killing with more killing. Right now, it's Assad and the rebels killing each other and civilians. The US comes in and its even more civilians dieing. Going into Syria is a mistake. The US can't even prove if Assad is the one using the chemical weapons. How are you going to make such a huge claim without giving countries like Russia evidence to support your claims. The US also does not want its own people to have weapons. Gun laws are getting more and more strict but why is it ok to arm the rebels?

While Obama hides with his family, many people will die fighting for something they don't believe in.
Image
Spoiler: show
omg im admin, srs

*Sunday*

Sunday
Donator
Posts: 4371
Joined: July 15, 2011, 7:21 am
Location: Croatia

Post by *Sunday* » September 6, 2013, 12:26 am
dizzy50 wrote:
*Sunday* wrote:
Were chemical weapons used in Syria? Probably yes. But the true question is who used chemical weapons. It could be either side, there are plenty of reasons for them to do so. One theory would be that USA is interested in Syria's oil and they gave the rebels chemical weapons so they can use them. After they did they would put the blame on Assad so USA could attack Syria. USA has spied and lied to us so many times, I wouldn't be surprised if this was true.
for fuck sake why is USA always connected with oil? can you prove anything sunday? no? then shut up about this oil crap im reading from all of you, how can USA steal oil from syria when there is a civil war going on? open your mind a little sunday
I can't prove anything? Can you prove that Assad was the one to use chemical weapons and not the rebels? No.
USA has attacked Iraq with similar claims and when they finally raided the whole place the claims proved to be wrong. USA states that spying is an act of war and recently it has been proven that they spy on almost the whole world (NSA leaks). How could you possibly trust such a scumbag and hypocrite government?
| S.A. Army Master Sergeant | Former S.W.A.T. Commander | Former Pagati Consigliere |
Image

dizzy50

Dizzy
Posts: 435
Joined: December 13, 2012, 3:09 pm

Post by dizzy50 » September 6, 2013, 10:19 am
*Sunday* wrote:
dizzy50 wrote:
*Sunday* wrote:
Were chemical weapons used in Syria? Probably yes. But the true question is who used chemical weapons. It could be either side, there are plenty of reasons for them to do so. One theory would be that USA is interested in Syria's oil and they gave the rebels chemical weapons so they can use them. After they did they would put the blame on Assad so USA could attack Syria. USA has spied and lied to us so many times, I wouldn't be surprised if this was true.
for fuck sake why is USA always connected with oil? can you prove anything sunday? no? then shut up about this oil crap im reading from all of you, how can USA steal oil from syria when there is a civil war going on? open your mind a little sunday
I can't prove anything? Can you prove that Assad was the one to use chemical weapons and not the rebels? No.
USA has attacked Iraq with similar claims and when they finally raided the whole place the claims proved to be wrong. USA states that spying is an act of war and recently it has been proven that they spy on almost the whole world (NSA leaks). How could you possibly trust such a scumbag and hypocrite government?
i agree about the Iraq war when they raided Iraq and found no chemical weapons but did you read why they raided Iraq? iraqi civilian who had enough from Sadam Houssein's region decided to put end in false reporting to the USA forces that there are chemical weapons tho' it's USA's problem that they haven't asked for proof but i still cannot see a connection between this and stealing oil...

Reda

User avatar
Reda
Donator
Posts: 4716
Joined: December 19, 2010, 10:40 am
Location: Hom

Post by Reda » September 6, 2013, 11:20 am
How can rebels use chemical weapons? All they have is an weak and not even enough ammo for the weapon itself.
Shall we begin?

D.O.G

D.O.G
Donator
Posts: 2189
Joined: January 12, 2011, 4:11 pm
Location: Kroejša

Post by D.O.G » September 6, 2013, 3:25 pm
Ryder wrote:
dizzy50 wrote:
Ryder wrote:
Dizzy do you really believe USA (referring to Obama) is some saint who wants to help Syria? I got this expression by reading few of your posts.
no, i never said that but is it better to let the war continue and do nothing about it when children are being killed by muslims?
No, of course not. But if they use violence they will receive violence - considering Russia backs up Syria you can't expect this to end any time soon. Not without millions innocent dead people. It's obvious Assad won't step down on his own, but starting a war is the most sick thing you can do.

Sick.
^Wise words
The very existence of flamethrowers proves that sometime, somewhere, someone said to themselves, “You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I’m just not close enough to get the job done.”
140 posts Page 8 of 14
Return to “Religion & Culture”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests