
Ryder wrote:Dizzy do you really believe USA (referring to Obama) is some saint who wants to help Syria? I got this expression by reading few of your posts.no, i never said that but is it better to let the war continue and do nothing about it when children are being killed by muslims?
dizzy50 wrote:No, of course not. But if they use violence they will receive violence - considering Russia backs up Syria you can't expect this to end any time soon. Not without millions innocent dead people. It's obvious Assad won't step down on his own, but starting a war is the most sick thing you can do.Ryder wrote:Dizzy do you really believe USA (referring to Obama) is some saint who wants to help Syria? I got this expression by reading few of your posts.no, i never said that but is it better to let the war continue and do nothing about it when children are being killed by muslims?
| - [b][color=#400040]S.A. Army [/color]B[color=#400040]rigadier [/color]G[color=#400040]eneral [/color][BG][/b], - [b][color=#400040]S.A. Army [/color]H[color=#400040]ead[/color] T[color=#400040]raining[/color] O[color=#400040]fficer[/color] [HTO][/b], - [b][color=#400040]S.A. [/color]A[color=#400040]rmy[/color] H[color=#400040]igh [/color]C[color=#400040]ommand Member[/color] [AHC][/b]. | - Former S.A. Army General (2013), - Former S.A. Army Head Event Officer (2015), - Former Server Administrator (2013).[/i] |
Ryder wrote:assad has no balls to do it, in fact USA planned to attack empty ammo factories and military compounds at night (!) which means theirdizzy50 wrote:No, of course not. But if they use violence they will receive violence - considering Russia backs up Syria you can't expect this to end any time soon. Not without millions innocent dead people. It's obvious Assad won't step down on his own, but starting a war is the most sick thing you can do.Ryder wrote:Dizzy do you really believe USA (referring to Obama) is some saint who wants to help Syria? I got this expression by reading few of your posts.no, i never said that but is it better to let the war continue and do nothing about it when children are being killed by muslims?
Sick.
The first bomb was a uranium-type and the second bomb was a plutonium-type. Truman (US president) wanted to test both types of bombs on real cities to compare and contrast the effects of uranium v plutonium for scientific purposes.What will stop them from doing it now? They did it before, they will do it again.
| - [b][color=#400040]S.A. Army [/color]B[color=#400040]rigadier [/color]G[color=#400040]eneral [/color][BG][/b], - [b][color=#400040]S.A. Army [/color]H[color=#400040]ead[/color] T[color=#400040]raining[/color] O[color=#400040]fficer[/color] [HTO][/b], - [b][color=#400040]S.A. [/color]A[color=#400040]rmy[/color] H[color=#400040]igh [/color]C[color=#400040]ommand Member[/color] [AHC][/b]. | - Former S.A. Army General (2013), - Former S.A. Army Head Event Officer (2015), - Former Server Administrator (2013).[/i] |
dizzy50 wrote:I can't prove anything? Can you prove that Assad was the one to use chemical weapons and not the rebels? No.*Sunday* wrote:Were chemical weapons used in Syria? Probably yes. But the true question is who used chemical weapons. It could be either side, there are plenty of reasons for them to do so. One theory would be that USA is interested in Syria's oil and they gave the rebels chemical weapons so they can use them. After they did they would put the blame on Assad so USA could attack Syria. USA has spied and lied to us so many times, I wouldn't be surprised if this was true.for fuck sake why is USA always connected with oil? can you prove anything sunday? no? then shut up about this oil crap im reading from all of you, how can USA steal oil from syria when there is a civil war going on? open your mind a little sunday

*Sunday* wrote:i agree about the Iraq war when they raided Iraq and found no chemical weapons but did you read why they raided Iraq? iraqi civilian who had enough from Sadam Houssein's region decided to put end in false reporting to the USA forces that there are chemical weapons tho' it's USA's problem that they haven't asked for proof but i still cannot see a connection between this and stealing oil...dizzy50 wrote:I can't prove anything? Can you prove that Assad was the one to use chemical weapons and not the rebels? No.*Sunday* wrote:Were chemical weapons used in Syria? Probably yes. But the true question is who used chemical weapons. It could be either side, there are plenty of reasons for them to do so. One theory would be that USA is interested in Syria's oil and they gave the rebels chemical weapons so they can use them. After they did they would put the blame on Assad so USA could attack Syria. USA has spied and lied to us so many times, I wouldn't be surprised if this was true.for fuck sake why is USA always connected with oil? can you prove anything sunday? no? then shut up about this oil crap im reading from all of you, how can USA steal oil from syria when there is a civil war going on? open your mind a little sunday
USA has attacked Iraq with similar claims and when they finally raided the whole place the claims proved to be wrong. USA states that spying is an act of war and recently it has been proven that they spy on almost the whole world (NSA leaks). How could you possibly trust such a scumbag and hypocrite government?
Ryder wrote:^Wise wordsdizzy50 wrote:No, of course not. But if they use violence they will receive violence - considering Russia backs up Syria you can't expect this to end any time soon. Not without millions innocent dead people. It's obvious Assad won't step down on his own, but starting a war is the most sick thing you can do.Ryder wrote:Dizzy do you really believe USA (referring to Obama) is some saint who wants to help Syria? I got this expression by reading few of your posts.no, i never said that but is it better to let the war continue and do nothing about it when children are being killed by muslims?
Sick.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests