A New Class : Hacker

[Safwan_theboss]

Thanks for the replies guys. I made the n > 0 and n < 1 for the kind of people who have around 5.000.000 in the bank, thus robbing them would only fetch 50.000. We can change the scale for different amounts, for eg. If a person has 20.000.000, in his case, n > 0 and n < 0.25 or 0.5. Yeah, it seems screwed up robbing 1% from an account with a billion. Thanks for the replies tho, guys. Appreciate them.

IF I ROB VIC I GONNA GET 20M WEW
+1

[Naruk]

Thanks for the replies guys. I made the n > 0 and n < 1 for the kind of people who have around 5.000.000 in the bank, thus robbing them would only fetch 50.000. We can change the scale for different amounts, for eg. If a person has 20.000.000, in his case, n > 0 and n < 0.25 or 0.5. Yeah, it seems screwed up robbing 1% from an account with a billion. Thanks for the replies tho, guys. Appreciate them.

Quite the opposite though, and by the way, what did you mean about using n, multiplier/ ratio or the percentage itself, more than 0 but less than 1%?

Opposite in a sense that the greater the money you have, the smaller the scale of th money able to be robbed, but put a minimum scale, you wouldnt want to rob Trix's bank account for 5$. So yeah that's the concept, the lesser the money you have, the greater the scale, if someone has 50k, and u tryna rob em, u coould pick everything, whole 50k

[NotAnAdmin]

Thanks for the replies guys. I made the n > 0 and n < 1 for the kind of people who have around 5.000.000 in the bank, thus robbing them would only fetch 50.000. We can change the scale for different amounts, for eg. If a person has 20.000.000, in his case, n > 0 and n < 0.25 or 0.5. Yeah, it seems screwed up robbing 1% from an account with a billion. Thanks for the replies tho, guys. Appreciate them.

Quite the opposite though, and by the way, what did you mean about using n, multiplier/ ratio or the percentage itself, more than 0 but less than 1%?

Opposite in a sense that the greater the money you have, the smaller the scale of th money able to be robbed, but put a minimum scale, you wouldnt want to rob Trix's bank account for 5$. So yeah that's the concept, the lesser the money you have, the greater the scale, if someone has 50k, and u tryna rob em, u coould pick everything, whole 50k

Actually, what I meant was the value of n would decrease as the bank balance goes higher, and increase as it goes lower. Your example perfectly states my thoughts.

[MattDet]

How about an Anonymous rank on the levels of SWAT/Army/Pagati to go along with this suggestion?

+1

[Naruk]

Thanks for the replies guys. I made the n > 0 and n < 1 for the kind of people who have around 5.000.000 in the bank, thus robbing them would only fetch 50.000. We can change the scale for different amounts, for eg. If a person has 20.000.000, in his case, n > 0 and n < 0.25 or 0.5. Yeah, it seems screwed up robbing 1% from an account with a billion. Thanks for the replies tho, guys. Appreciate them.

Quite the opposite though, and by the way, what did you mean about using n, multiplier/ ratio or the percentage itself, more than 0 but less than 1%?

Opposite in a sense that the greater the money you have, the smaller the scale of th money able to be robbed, but put a minimum scale, you wouldnt want to rob Trix's bank account for 5$. So yeah that's the concept, the lesser the money you have, the greater the scale, if someone has 50k, and u tryna rob em, u coould pick everything, whole 50k

Actually, what I meant was the value of n would decrease as the bank balance goes higher, and increase as it goes lower. Your example perfectly states my thoughts.

Lol sorry, I thought you wrote 2,000,000. Its actually 20m lewl

[Asfi]

Thanks for the replies guys. I made the n > 0 and n < 1 for the kind of people who have around 5.000.000 in the bank, thus robbing them would only fetch 50.000. We can change the scale for different amounts, for eg. If a person has 20.000.000, in his case, n > 0 and n < 0.25 or 0.5. Yeah, it seems screwed up robbing 1% from an account with a billion. Thanks for the replies tho, guys. Appreciate them.

Hy , dude I really liked your suggestion , but If every one starts to starts to rob and fetch 50.000 from one's account , I don't think Their will be any money left ...
i think you got me ?
Its kind a risky !!!

[Demon.]

I'm neutral on this suggestion since everyone will spawn as a Hacker instead of any other skill. The idea sounds really nice.

If successful, everyone gets an equal share, and n% of money is robbed from Energ's account, wherein n > 0 && n < 1.

I know what you wanted to say with this, but this isn't just right...

Yeah everyone would spawn, but they'd get bored sooner or later so it would probably be normal.

+1 on the suggestion.

[LOUD]

Well I like the idea and +1 from my side.
Secondly, the percentage should be less than 0.4% also, if you failed to rob (Stores/bank accounts) you will be fined for 100,000$ (in game) and of-course a wanted level, which will make it nicer and look fair.
And.. A person should have a higher score than 1000+ and a robskill of 1000+ as well. Since It's way too easy to make 100-500 score or robskills.
And ONLY ALLOWS TO ROB A PERSON WHO'S ONLINE AT THAT TIME... + The person who's getting robbed should be warned and have a certain amount of time to reach bank and kill that guy or maybe ALLOW shock command on the hacker, and once he's shocked the robbery fails and he have to wait 1 day to try again ON THE SAME PERSON ofc.

[deserteagle]

great suggestion but pls apply only to the person online..
ways to defend urself is buy an antivirus from the shop to prevent hackers hacking u

[Gouveia]

Sounds cool +1